scholarly journals Impact of Surgeon Handedness in Manual and Robot-assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangpeng Kong ◽  
Minzhi Yang ◽  
Xiang Li ◽  
Ming Ni ◽  
Guoqiang Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Acetabular Cup ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Manual Group ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Cup Positioning

Abstract Background: The purpose of this study was to examine whether surgeon handedness could affect cup positioning in manual total hip arthroplasty (THA), and whether robot could diminish or eliminate the impact of surgeon handedness on cup positioning in robot-assisted THA.Methods: Fifty-three patients who underwent bilateral robot-assisted THA and sixty-two patients who underwent bilateral manual THA between August 2018 and July 2019 in our institute were respectively analyzed in this study. When the difference between the bilateral anteversion or inclination was greater than 5°, the patient was regarded as having different cup positioning between bilateral THA. Their demographics, orientation of acetabular cup and postoperative 3 month Harris hip score (HHS) were recorded for analysis. Results: There were no significant difference in the gender, age, BMI, diagnosis’s composition, preoperative and postoperative HHS between the robotic and manual group. Two left hips dislocated in the manual group. The anteversion of left hip was significantly larger than that of right hip (24.77±10.44 vs 22.44±8.67, p=0.043) in the manual group. There were no significant difference of cup positioning between bilateral robot-assisted THA. The patients in manual group were significantly more likely to have different cup positioning between bilateral hips than those in robotic group (77% vs 45%, p=0.000). More manual THA were located out of the target zone than robot-assisted THA (70% vs 48%, p=0.001). Conclusions: Surgeon’s handedness showed a trend towards an impact on cup positioning in manual THA and robot might help surgeon eliminate the adverse impact. However, the impact of handedness on the clinical outcomes still needs further observation.

scholarly journals Impact of Surgeon Handedness in Manual and Robot-assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangpeng Kong ◽  
Minzhi Yang ◽  
Xiang Li ◽  
Ming Ni ◽  
Guoqiang Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Adverse Impact ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Manual Group ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Cup Positioning

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to examine whether surgeon handedness could affect cup positioning in manual total hip arthroplasty (THA), and whether robot could diminish or eliminate the impact of surgeon handedness on cup positioning in robot-assisted THA.Methods Fifty-three patients who underwent bilateral robot-assisted THA and sixty-two patients who underwent bilateral manual THA between August 2018 and July 2019 in our institute were respectively analyzed in this study. When the difference between the bilateral anteversion or inclination was greater than 5°, the patient was regarded as having different cup positioning between bilateral THA. Their demographics, orientation of acetabular cup and postoperative 3 month Harris hip score (HHS) were recorded for analysis.Results There were no significant difference in the gender, age, BMI, diagnosis's composition, preoperative and postoperative HHS between the robotic and manual group. Two left hips dislocated in the manual group. The anteversion of left hip was significantly larger than that of right hip (24.77±10.44 vs 22.44±8.67, p=0.043) in the manual group. There were no significant difference of cup positioning between bilateral robot-assisted THA. The patients in manual group were significantly more likely to have different cup positioning between bilateral hips than those in robotic group (77% vs 45%, p=0.000).Conclusions Surgeon's handedness had adverse impact on anteversion of the non-dominant side in manual THA and right-handed surgeons were more likely to place the left cup in larger anteversion. Robot could help surgeon eliminate the adverse impact caused by personal innate handedness.

scholarly journals Accuracy of Image-less Navigation for Functional Cup Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty

10.29007/3lbz ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morteza Meftah ◽  
Vinnay Siddappa ◽  
Jeffery Muir ◽  
Peter White
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Safe Zone ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Acetabular Cup ◽  
Assisted Navigation ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cup Positioning

Computer-assisted navigation has the potential to improve the accuracy of cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty (THA) and prevent leg length discrepancy (LLD). The purpose of this study was to compare acetabular cup position and post- operative LLD after primary THA using posterolateral approach. Between August 2016 to December 2017, 57 THAs using imageless navigation were matched with 57 THA without navigation, based on age, gender and BMI. Post-operative weight-bearing radiographs were assessed using for anteversion, inclination and LLD. Goal for functional cup placement was 40° inclination and 20° anteversion based on preoperative weight bearing pelvic images. Functional LLD was measured as compared to pre- operative radiographs and contralateral side. Proportion of cups within Lewinnek’s safe zone, proximity to a pre-operative target of and the LLD >5 mm was assessed. The mean age was 54.9 ± 9.6 years (30 – 72) and 57.6 ± 12.5 years (20 – 85) in control and navigated groups, respectively. Mean cup orientation in the navigated group was 20.6°± 3.3° (17 - 25) of anteversion and 41.9°± 4.8° (30 - 51) of inclination, vs. 25.0°± 11.1° (10 - 31) and 45.7°± 8.7° (29 – 55) in control group, where were statistically significant (p=0.005 and p=0.0001), respectively. In the navigated group, significantly more acetabular cups were placed within Lewinnek’s safe zone (anteversion: 78% vs. 47%, p=0.005; inclination: 92% vs. 67%, p=0.002). There was no significant difference in mean LLD in navigation and control groups (3.1 ± 1.5 mm vs. 4.6 ± 3.4 mm, p=0.36), although fewer LLDs >5 mm were reported in the navigated group (7.1%) than in controls (31.4%, p=0.007). The use of this image-less computer-assisted navigation improved the accuracy with which acetabular cup components were placed and may represent an important method for limiting post-operative complications related to cup malpositioning and LLD.

scholarly journals Which one is more affected by navigation-assisted cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty: Anteversion or inclination? A retrospective matched-pair cohort study in Asian physique

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 230949901878075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwang Jun Oh ◽  
Byung Kag Kim ◽  
Myung Il Jo ◽  
Byung Mun Ahn
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Matched Pair ◽  
Mean Deviation ◽  
Acetabular Cup ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Imageless Navigation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Matching Criteria ◽  
Cup Positioning

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare acetabular cup positioning using an imageless navigation-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) to a case-matched control group using the conventional technique in Asian physique. Methods: Case matching controlled study using retrospectively collected data for THAs was done. Matching criteria were gender, age ± 5 years, and body mass index ± 5 kg/m2. Thirty patients who had navigation THAs were manually matched to a conventional group of 30 patients. After measuring anteversion and inclination on 3-D CT, final cup anteversion was calculated using the mathematical formula (anteversion = arctan [tan (anatomic anteversion) × sin (inclination)]). Results: No significant difference was observed between mean inclination ( p = 0.420), anteversion ( p = 0.697), and the mean deviation from 15° for anteversion ( p = 0.649). However, there was a statistical significant difference for mean deviation from 40° for inclination ( p = 0.027). There was a significant difference in the percentage of correctly placed acetabular cup in safe zones with inclination ( p = 0.039). Conclusions: Although soft tissue overlying the pubic tubercle interfered with registration of the bony landmark and thereby induced inaccuracy of anteversion angles in the navigation group, the use of imageless navigation-assisted technique increases the placement within the safe zone for inclination and enhances the accuracy and the precision of inclination of the acetabular cup relative to the conventional THA rather than anteversion. This finding may be due to the effect of the patient’s physique on the anterior pelvic plane (APP)-based reference system of imageless navigation.

scholarly journals Total hip arthroplasty for high-riding hips: A retrospective analysis of 79 cases and proposal of a new classification

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 230949902092416
Author(s):  
İsmail Demirkale ◽  
Yüksel Uğur Yaradılmış ◽  
Ahmet Ateş ◽  
Murat Altay
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Classification System ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Limb Length Discrepancy ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Functional Scores

Purpose: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for high-riding hips is a complex procedure and the requirement for subtrochanteric osteotomy (STO) is an important decision that needs to be taken preoperatively. STO renders this complex surgery even more complicated and there are no guidelines to determine the STO requirement. In this study, the outcomes of THA for patients with high-riding hips were evaluated and a practical classification system is proposed to predict any osteotomy requirement. Methods: A retrospective evaluation was made of 79 hips of 76 patients who underwent THA for high-riding hip dysplasia. The amount of shortening in patients with STO and in patients without STO was compared. All patients were evaluated in respect of Harris hip score, operating time, erythrocyte suspension need, and actual limb length discrepancy. Preoperative radiographs were classified into four types according to the ratio of the distance between the lesser trochanter and the ischial tuberosity with pelvic height (LT-IT/P) to grade the degree of dislocation. Results: The mean follow-up was 30 ± 6.54 months. STO was applied to 47 (60%) hips and not to 32 (40%). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in respect of the functional scores. STO prolonged the operating time and increased the need for blood transfusion ( p = 0.026, p < 0.001, respectively). When the LT-IT/P index was <0.19 (type 1), no additional surgical approach was required for reduction, at 0.19–0.29 (type 2), the head can be safely reduced with additional reduction methods, and when >0.3 (type 3), a shortening osteotomy will most likely be required. The rate of complications is increased if LT-IT/P is >0.4 (type 4). Conclusion: STO adjunct to THA increases the rate of complications. This practical classification system may guide the surgeon in the decision of whether an STO should be added to the procedure or not. Level of evidence: Level III, clinical trial

scholarly journals 32-mm ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty versus 28-mm ceramic bearings: 5- to 15-year follow-up study

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshitoshi Higuchi ◽  
Taisuke Seki ◽  
Yukiharu Hasegawa ◽  
Yasuhiko Takegami ◽  
Daigo Morita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Average Patient ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Ceramic On Ceramic

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic results of 28-mm ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasty (THA) to those of 32-mm CoC during a 5- to 15-year follow-up period. Methods: 107 joints (95 women and 6 men) underwent 28-mm CoC, and 60 (49 women and 7 men) underwent 32-mm CoC. The average patient age at the time of surgery was 56.1 and 55.7 years in the 28-mm and 32-mm CoC groups, respectively. Clinical and radiologic measurements of all patients were analysed. Results: The mean preoperative Harris hip score (HHS) was similar in the 2 groups (28-mm, 58.9; and 32-mm, 58.5). However, at final follow-up, the mean HHS of the 32-mm CoC (91.8) was significantly better than that of the 28-mm CoC (88.2) ( p = 0.003), as were the ranges of motion (ROM) for flexion (98.3 ± 13.5° vs. 87.3 ± 19.3°, p < 0.001) and abduction (27.8 ± 14.9° vs. 22.1 ± 19.3°, p = 0.007). The mean wear rate was 0.0044 mm/year for the 28-mm CoC and 0.0044 mm/year for the 32-mm CoC. No ceramic fractures were found in the 2 groups. One joint in the 28-mm CoC (0.9%) required revision owing to progressive osteolysis. Kaplan-Meier survival at 10 years, with implant loosening or revision THA as the endpoint, was 98.3% for 28-mm CoC and 100% for 32-mm CoC ( p = 0.465). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in ceramic-related complications between the 2 groups. Our study demonstrated that the 32-mm and 28-mm CoC are safe and are associated with good clinical outcomes.

Total Hip Arthroplasty after Vascularized Fibular Grafting

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17
Author(s):  
Thomas P Vail ◽  
Apostolos Dimitroulias ◽  
Jeff Hodrick ◽  
Rusty Brand ◽  
Nicholas Viens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Acetabular Component ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Fibular Grafting

ABSTRACT Background Vascularized fibular grafting has been reported as a successful joint preserving surgery for patients with femoral head osteonecrosis. Few reports exist regarding the outcomes associated with total hip arthroplasty after failed vascularized fibular grafting. This study aims to highlight the early results and complications associated with this procedure. Materials and methods We retrospectively reviewed charts and radiographs of 30 patients (38 hips) who underwent conversion of prior vascularized fibular grafting to an uncemented total hip arthroplasty utilizing modern bearings (highly cross-linked polyethylene-on-metal or metal-on-metal). Mean follow-up was 41 months. A control group of 15 osteonecrosis patients (19 hips) was used who had a history of total hip arthroplasty without previous surgery. Outcome measures used were perioperative complications, clinical and radiological findings. Results The prior vascularized fibular grafting group had longer surgical times and more perioperative complications (calcar fracture and persistent wound drainage requiring early reoperation). In the prior vascularized fibular grafting group there were two cases requiring revision for aseptic loosening (one femoral and one acetabular component) and three cases of asymptomatic radiographic loosening (two femoral and one acetabular component). Furthermore, three patients reported symptoms of trochanteric bursitis. None of the above complications were seen in the control group. There was one dislocation in each group; and both were treated successfully with closed reduction. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the final postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS). Conclusion Despite an increased complication rate, comparable clinical outcomes can be expected after conversion of vascularized fibular grafting to total hip arthroplasty. Dimitroulias A, Hodrick J, Brand R, Viens N, Attarian DE Vail TP, Bolognesi MP. Total Hip Arthroplasty after Vascularized Fibular Grafting. The Duke Orthop J 2012; 2(1):12-17.

Does Robotic-Assisted Computer Navigation Affect Acetabular Cup Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Obese Patient? A Comparison Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 2204-2207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asheesh Gupta ◽  
John M. Redmond ◽  
Jon E. Hammarstedt ◽  
Alexandra E. Petrakos ◽  
S. Pavan Vemula ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Obese Patient ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Computer Navigation ◽  
Comparison Study ◽  
Acetabular Cup ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Cup Positioning

Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing two Methods of Acetabular Cup Positioning during Total Hip Arthroplasty

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.-A. Vendittoli ◽  
M. Ganapathi ◽  
N. Duval ◽  
P. Lavoie ◽  
A. Roy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Reference Points ◽  
Abduction Angle ◽  
Anatomical Landmarks ◽  
Acetabular Cup ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Visuospatial Perception ◽  
Cup Positioning

Background Acetabular cup positioning is an important technical aspect in total hip arthroplasty. Most surgeons estimate cup abduction angle during surgery with the insertion rod position according to the patient's body anatomical landmarks or other reference points in the operating room. High acetabular component abduction angle is associated with an increased risk of dislocation, premature polyethylene wear and osteolysis. Method To evaluate the potential benefits of a new technique for vertical acetabular cup positioning, 100 acetabular cups were randomised to be inserted with or without an inclinometer. Abduction angles were measured on postoperative radiographs by 2 evaluators blind to the treatment group. Results Of the cups, 57% (27/47) were positioned within the desirable abduction angle range of 40°–49° with the inclinometer, compared with 50% (27/53) by visuospatial perception (p=0.454). The proportion of cups positioned outside a safe angle range of 30°–55° was low in both groups: 6% (3/47) for the inclinometer group versus 4% (2/53) for the visuospatial perception group (p=0.536). Conclusion The use of an inclinometer did not significantly improve the acetabular cup abduction angle obtained by our group of surgeons when compared with visuospatial perception. Newer techniques such as navigation may be useful in further optimising cup positioning and reducing the outliers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document