Stereotactic Radiosurgery Versus Active Surveillance for Asymptomatic, Skull-Based Meningiomas: An International, Multicenter Matched Cohort Study
Abstract Objective: The optimal management of asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas is not well defined. The aim of this study is to compare the imaging and clinical outcomes of patients with asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas managed either with upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or active surveillance.Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study involved patients with asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas. The study end-points included local tumor control and the development of new neurological deficits attributable to the tumor. Factors associated with tumor progression and neurological morbidity were also analyzed.Results: The combined unmatched cohort included 417 patients. Following propensity score matching for age, tumor volume, and follow-up 110 patients remained in each cohort. Tumor control was achieved in 98.2% and 61.8% of the SRS and active surveillance cohorts, respectively. SRS was associated with superior local tumor control (p<0.001, HR=0.01, 95% CI=0.002-0.13) compared to active surveillance. Three patients (2.7%) in the SRS cohort and six (5.5%) in the active surveillance cohort exhibited neurological deterioration. One (0.9 %) patient in the SRS-treated and 11 (10%) patients in the active surveillance cohort required surgical management of their meningioma during follow-up.Conclusions: SRS is associated with superior local control of asymptomatic, skull-based meningiomas as compared to active surveillance and does so with low morbidity rates. Active surveillance with regular neuroimaging studies does not always detect tumor growth before symptomatic progression. SRS should be considered as an alternative to active surveillance at diagnosis of an asymptomatic skull base meningioma. If active surveillance is initially chosen, SRS should be recommended when tumor growth from the original presenting volume is noted during follow-up.