scholarly journals Dosimetric Evaluation of a Treatment Planning System Using the Aapm Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a (MPPG 5.a) Validation Tests

Author(s):  
Yousif A Yousif ◽  
Jackson Zifodya

Abstract In this work, the AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.a (MPPG 5.a) validation tests package was used to evaluate the dosimetric performance of a new version of the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) algorithms. A series of tests were developed and comparisons between TPS calculated and corresponding beam data measurements have been performed for basic beam validation, heterogeneity correction and IMRT/VMAT dose validation tests. Measurements were performed using a Varian IX Linear Accelerator with the 6 MV, 6MV FFF and 18 MV photon beams, and 6, 9, 12, 16, 20 MeV electron beams. Results for basic dose validation tests yielded differences within 3% for all point doses and pass rate greater than 95% for all depth profiles using 3%/3mm criteria. For testing the ability of the TPS in accounting for tissue inhomogeneity, corresponding comparisons were performed with the presence of a heterogeneous media to simulate an air inhomogeneity. Results showed a mean deviation between the TPS calculated and measured of 1.9%, reaching a maximum of 2.8% for the AAA algorithm. For IMRT/VMAT validation tests, our local criteria passing rate of 95% was used, but no consensus of the tolerance exists. Our results agree well with the data reported accuracy in previous studies of Eclipse TPS. In summary, the AAPM MPPG 5.a validation tests are a valuable package for evaluating dose calculation accuracy and are very useful for TPS upgrade checks, commissioning tests and routine TPS QA.

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica W. K. Kan ◽  
Peter K. N. Yu ◽  
Lucullus H. T. Leung

Deterministic linear Boltzmann transport equation (D-LBTE) solvers have recently been developed, and one of the latest available software codes, Acuros XB, has been implemented in a commercial treatment planning system for radiotherapy photon beam dose calculation. One of the major limitations of most commercially available model-based algorithms for photon dose calculation is the ability to account for the effect of electron transport. This induces some errors in patient dose calculations, especially near heterogeneous interfaces between low and high density media such as tissue/lung interfaces. D-LBTE solvers have a high potential of producing accurate dose distributions in and near heterogeneous media in the human body. Extensive previous investigations have proved that D-LBTE solvers were able to produce comparable dose calculation accuracy as Monte Carlo methods with a reasonable speed good enough for clinical use. The current paper reviews the dosimetric evaluations of D-LBTE solvers for external beam photon radiotherapy. This content summarizes and discusses dosimetric validations for D-LBTE solvers in both homogeneous and heterogeneous media under different circumstances and also the clinical impact on various diseases due to the conversion of dose calculation from a conventional convolution/superposition algorithm to a recently released D-LBTE solver.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naonori Hu ◽  
Hiroki Tanaka ◽  
Ryo Kakino ◽  
Syuushi Yoshikawa ◽  
Mamoru Miyao ◽  
...  

AbstractBoron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) for the treatment of unresectable, locally advanced, and recurrent carcinoma of the head and neck cancer has been approved by the Japanese government for reimbursement under the national health insurance as of June 2020. A new treatment planning system for clinical BNCT has been developed by Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd. (Sumitomo), NeuCure® Dose Engine. To safely implement this system for clinical use, the simulated neutron flux and gamma ray dose rate inside a water phantom was compared against experimental measurements. Furthermore, to validate and verify the new planning system, the dose distribution inside an anthropomorphic head phantom was compared against a BNCT treatment planning system SERA and an in-house developed Monte Carlo dose calculation program. The simulated results closely matched the experimental results, within 5% for the thermal neutron flux and 10% for the gamma ray dose rate. The dose distribution inside the head phantom closely matched with SERA and the in-house developed dose calculation program, within 3% for the tumour and a difference of 0.3 Gyw for the brain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document