Risk Factors of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis and Recurrence in Patients with Early Cervical Cancer

Author(s):  
Xinmei Wang ◽  
Hongyuan Zhang ◽  
Juan Xu ◽  
Pengpeng Qu

Abstract Background: Pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM) is one of the critical factors affecting the postoperative prognosis of patients with cervical cancer. Preoperative identification of risk factors for PLNM can optimize preoperative treatment plans and prognostic assessments.The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk factors for PLNM and its recurrence in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.Methods: Medical records of 245 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy as primary treatment for the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO,2009) stage IA-IIA cervical cancer between January 2010 and December 2015 were reviewed. Clinicopathological risk factors were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were followed up for 5–10 years. Multivariate analysis was performed using a logistic regression model for the analysis of risk factors for PLNM.Results: Preoperative hemoglobin level, FIGO stage, LVSI, parametrial infiltration, and tumor diameter differed significantly between the two groups (P<0.05).Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative hemoglobin <110 g/L, FIGO stage II, LVSI, parametrial infiltration, and tumor diameter ≥4 cm as significant risk factors for PLNM and recurrence of cervical cancer after surgery (P<0.05). PLNM was identified as the independent risk factor for recurrence in patients with cervical cancer after surgery (P<0.05).Conclusions: Patients with PLNM have a high recurrence rate, and postoperative follow-up should be closely followed to ensure timely detection of recurrence and treatment. For patients at high risk of PLNM, intraoperative careful and comprehensive pelvic lymph node resection should be performed to avoid missing metastatic lymph nodes and affecting the prognosis. Given the many complications of pelvic lymph node dissection for the low-risk population, further research is needed to determine whether pelvic lymphadenectomy should be attempted only in high-risk individuals.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinmei Wang ◽  
Hongyuan Zhang ◽  
Juan Xu ◽  
Pengpeng Qu

Abstract Background: Radical hysterectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy are standard treatments for early-stage cervical cancer. Pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM) is one of the critical factors affecting the postoperative prognosis of patients. Therefore, the identification of preoperative risk factors for PLNM will minimize its occurrence and improve prognosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk factors for PLNM and its recurrence in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.Methods: Medical records of 245 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy as primary treatment for the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA-IIA cervical cancer between January 2010 and December 2015 at our hospital were reviewed. Age, FIGO stage, preoperative hemoglobin level, depth of stromal invasion, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), human papillomavirus(HPV) infection, parametrial infiltration, tumor diameter, number of lymphadenectomies, and pathological type were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were followed up for 5–10 years.Results: Among the 245 patients, 185 (75.51%) had no PLNM, whereas 60 (24.49%) had PLNM. Preoperative hemoglobin level, FIGO stage, LVSI, parametrial infiltration, and tumor diameter differed significantly between the two groups (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative hemoglobin <110 g/L, FIGO stage II, LVSI, parametrial infiltration, and tumor diameter ≥4 cm as significant risk factors for PLNM and recurrence of cervical cancer after surgery (P<0.05). PLNM was identified as the independent risk factor for recurrence in patients with cervical cancer after surgery (P<0.05).Conclusions: PLNM is an important prognostic indicator for the clinical treatment of cervical cancer. Patients at a high risk of recurrence, especially PLNM patients, should be followed up closely after surgery to ensure the timely detection of recurrence and treatment.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunlin Chen ◽  
Hui Duan ◽  
Wenling Zhang ◽  
Hongwei Zhao ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Current opinions on whether surgical patients with cervical cancer should undergo para-aortic lymphadenectomy at the same time are inconsistent. The present study examined differences in survival outcomes with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy in surgical patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.Methods: We retrospectively compared the survival outcomes of 8802 cervical cancer patients with stage IB1-IIA2 (FIGO 2009) from 37 hospitals in mainland China, who underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy + pelvic lymphadenectomy (n=8445) or abdominal radical hysterectomy + pelvic lymphadenectomy + para-aortic lymphadenectomy (n=357).Results: Among the 8802 patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer, 1618 (18.38%) patients had postoperative pelvic lymph node metastasis, and 37 (10.36%) patients had para-aortic lymph node metastasis. When pelvic lymph node metastasized, the para-aortic lymph node simultaneous metastasis rate was 30.00% (36/120). The risk of isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis was 0.42% (1/237). There were no significant differences in the survival outcomes between the para-aortic lymph node unresected and resected groups. No differences in the survival outcomes were found before or after matching between the two groups regardless of pelvic lymph node negativity/positivity. Conclusion: Para-aortic lymphadenectomy did not improve 5-year survival outcomes in surgical patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer. Therefore, when pelvic lymph node metastasis is negative, the risk of isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis is very low, and para-aortic lymphadenectomy is not recommended. When pelvic lymph node metastasis is positive, para-aortic lymphadenectomy should be carefully selected because of the high risk of this procedure.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 2624-2632
Author(s):  
Jing Zhao ◽  
Jing Cai ◽  
Hongbo Wang ◽  
Weihong Dong ◽  
Yuan Zhang ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunlin Chen ◽  
Hui Duan ◽  
Wenling Zhang ◽  
Hongwei Zhao ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Current opinions on whether surgical patients with cervical cancer should undergo para-aortic lymphadenectomy at the same time are inconsistent. The present study examined differences in survival outcomes with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy in surgical patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer. Methods We retrospectively compared the survival outcomes of 8802 stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer patients (FIGO 2009) who underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy + pelvic lymphadenectomy (n = 8445) or abdominal radical hysterectomy + pelvic lymphadenectomy + para-aortic lymphadenectomy (n = 357) from 37 hospitals in mainland China. Results Among the 8802 patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer, 1618 (18.38%) patients had postoperative pelvic lymph node metastases, and 37 (10.36%) patients had para-aortic lymph node metastasis. When pelvic lymph nodes had metastases, the para-aortic lymph node simultaneous metastasis rate was 30.00% (36/120). The risk of isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis was 0.42% (1/237). There were no significant differences in the survival outcomes between the para-aortic lymph node unresected and resected groups. No differences in the survival outcomes were found before or after matching between the two groups regardless of pelvic lymph node negativity/positivity. Conclusion Para-aortic lymphadenectomy did not improve 5-year survival outcomes in surgical patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer. Therefore, when pelvic lymph node metastasis is negative, the risk of isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis is very low, and para-aortic lymphadenectomy is not recommended. When pelvic lymph node metastasis is positive, para-aortic lymphadenectomy should be carefully selected because of the high risk of this procedure.


2018 ◽  
Vol 09 (12) ◽  
pp. 1011-1026
Author(s):  
J. Ferdous ◽  
S. Khatun ◽  
S. Akhter ◽  
S. Chowdhury ◽  
S. Pervin ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 468-474
Author(s):  
D. Dargent ◽  
G. Lamblin ◽  
P. Romestaing ◽  
X. Montbarbon ◽  
P. Mathevet ◽  
...  

Efficiency of radiotherapy in controlling lymph node metastasis is a controversial issue. A continuous series of 87 patients affected by cervical cancer stages IB2–IVA and treated using pelvic radiotherapy is presented. A retrospective comparison is made between two populations. In the two populations, a staging lymphadenectomy was carried out before the onset of the therapeutic program. In the first population (53 patients), the pelvic nodes only were dissected and in the second one (34 patients), the pelvic lymph nodes were left in place and the paraaortic nodes only were dissected. In both series, a completion surgery was performed after finalization of the radiotherapy. It was carried out at open abdomen in both series. It included a systematic pelvic dissection for the patients whose pelvic nodes had been intentionally left in place at the time of the initial staging lymphadenectomy. Both series were identical as far as classic risk factors were concerned (FIGO stage, maximal tumor diameter, lymphovascular space involvement). The radiotherapy administered to the pelvis was the same in both populations. The number of patients with pelvic lymph node metastasis was 21 (39.6%) in the first population versus 6 (17.6%) in the second one (P = 0.03). The percentage of positive lymph nodes among the retrieved lymph nodes was 18.94 in the first population versus 2.8 in the second one (P = 0.0001). Pelvic radiotherapy is likely to control most of the pelvic lymph node metastasis, but not all of them. Practical deductions and further developments are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document