scholarly journals Comparison of the clinicopathological characteristics and their impact on outcomes of resected colorectal liver metastases across time

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lionel Chen ◽  
Nicholas L. Syn ◽  
Brian K. P. Goh ◽  
Peng Chung Cheow ◽  
Prema Raj ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) has been established as the standard of care. This study aims to compare the change in clinicopathological characteristics of patients who underwent curative resection of CLM across two time periods – 2000 to 2010 (P1) and 2011 to 2016 (P2) and evaluate the prognostic impact of these characteristics on survival outcomes. Methods Patients who undergo liver resection for CLM at Singapore General Hospital from January 2000 to December 2016 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The primary end point was overall survival. Results There were 183/318 (57.5%) patients and 135/318 (42.5%) patients in P1 and P2 respectively. There was a lower proportion of patients who had nodal metastases from primary colorectal cancer and clinical risk score (CRS) less than 3 in P2 when compared to P1. There was no difference in survival between both time periods. Independent predictors of survival for the cohort were CEA levels ≥200ng/ml, primary tumour grade and lymph nodal status. Independent predictors of poor survival in P1 were poorly differentiated colorectal cancer and nodal metastases while in P2, independent predictors of poor survival were multiple liver metastases and nodal metastases.Conclusion Nodal metastases from primary colorectal cancer is an independent predictor of poor survival across time for resectable CLM. Although there is no difference in survival between the two time periods, patients with multiple liver metastases should be carefully considered prior to surgery as it is also an independent predictor of overall survival.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lionel Chen ◽  
Nicholas L. Syn ◽  
Brian K. P. Goh ◽  
Peng Chung Cheow ◽  
Prema Raj ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) has been established as the standard of care. This study aims to compare the change in clinicopathological characteristics of patients who underwent curative resection of CLM across two time periods – 2000 to 2010 (P1) and 2011 to 2016 (P2) and evaluate the prognostic impact of these characteristics on survival outcomes. Methods Patients who undergo liver resection for CLM at Singapore General Hospital from January 2000 to December 2016 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The primary end point was overall survival. Results There were 183/318 (57.5%) patients and 135/318 (42.5%) patients in P1 and P2 respectively. There was a lower proportion of patients who had nodal metastases from primary colorectal cancer and clinical risk score (CRS) less than 3 in P2 when compared to P1. There was no difference in survival between both time periods. Independent predictors of survival for the cohort were CEA levels ≥200ng/ml, primary tumour grade and lymph nodal status. Independent predictors of poor survival in P1 were poorly differentiated colorectal cancer and nodal metastases while in P2, independent predictors of poor survival were multiple liver metastases and nodal metastases.Conclusion Nodal metastases from primary colorectal cancer is an independent predictor of poor survival across time for resectable CLM. Although there is no difference in survival between the two time periods, patients with multiple liver metastases should be carefully considered prior to surgery as it is also an independent predictor of overall survival.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lionel Chen ◽  
Nicholas L. Syn ◽  
Brian K. P. Goh ◽  
Peng Chung Cheow ◽  
Prema Raj ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) has been established as the standard of care. This study aims to compare the change in clinicopathological characteristics of patients who underwent curative resection of CLM across two time periods – 2000 to 2010 (T1) and 2011 to 2016 (T2) and evaluate the prognostic impact of these characteristics on survival outcomes. Methods: Patients who undergo liver resection for CLM at Singapore General Hospital from January 2000 to December 2016 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The primary end point was overall survival. ResultsThere were 183/318 (57.5%) patients and 135 /318 (42.5%) patients in T1 and T2 respectively. There was a lower proportion of patients who had nodal metastases from primary colorectal cancer and clinical risk score (CRS) less than 3 in T2 when compared to T1. There was no difference in survival between both time periods (HR 0.850 95% CI 0.601 – 1.201 p = 0.357). Independent predictors of survival for the cohort were CEA levels ≥200ng/ml, primary tumour grade and lymph nodal status. Independent predictors of poor survival in T1 were poorly differentiated colorectal cancer and nodal metastases while in T2, independent predictors of poor survival were multiple liver metastases and nodal metastases.Conclusion: Nodal metastases from primary colorectal cancer is an independent predictor of poor survival across time for resectable CLM. Although there is no difference in survival between the two time periods, patients with multiple liver metastases should be carefully considered prior to surgery as it is also an independent predictor of overall survival.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lionel Chen ◽  
Nicholas L. Syn ◽  
Brian K. P. Goh ◽  
Peng Chung Cheow ◽  
Prema Raj ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) has been established as the standard of care. This study aims to compare the change in clinicopathological characteristics of patients who underwent curative resection of CLM across two time periods – 2000 to 2010 (P1) and 2011 to 2016 (P2) and evaluate the prognostic impact of these characteristics on survival outcomes. Methods Patients who undergo liver resection for CLM at Singapore General Hospital from January 2000 to December 2016 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The primary end point was overall survival. Results There were 183/318 (57.5%) patients and 135/318 (42.5%) patients in P1 and P2 respectively. There was a lower proportion of patients who had nodal metastases from primary colorectal cancer and clinical risk score (CRS) less than 3 in P2 when compared to P1. There was no difference in survival between both time periods. Independent predictors of survival for the cohort were CEA levels ≥200 ng/ml, primary tumour grade and lymph nodal status. Independent predictors of poor survival in P1 were poorly differentiated colorectal cancer and nodal metastases while in P2, independent predictors of poor survival were multiple liver metastases and nodal metastases.Conclusion Nodal metastases from primary colorectal cancer is an independent predictor of poor survival across time for resectable CLM. Although there is no difference in survival between the two time periods, patients with multiple liver metastases should be carefully considered prior to surgery as it is also an independent predictor of overall survival.


2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. S50-S51
Author(s):  
P. Sutton ◽  
R. Jones ◽  
R. Jenkins ◽  
D. Vimalachandran ◽  
C. Goldring ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Felipe José Fernandez COIMBRA ◽  
Heber Salvador de Castro RIBEIRO ◽  
Márcio Carmona MARQUES ◽  
Paulo HERMAN ◽  
Rubens CHOJNIAK ◽  
...  

Background : Liver metastases of colorectal cancer are frequent and potentially fatal event in the evolution of patients with these tumors. Aim : In this module, was contextualized the clinical situations and parameterized epidemiological data and results of the various treatment modalities established. Method: Was realized deep discussion on detecting and staging metastatic colorectal cancer, as well as employment of imaging methods in the evaluation of response to instituted systemic therapy. Results : The next step was based on the definition of which patients would have their metastases considered resectable and how to expand the amount of patients elegible for modalities with curative intent. Conclusion : Were presented clinical, pathological and molecular prognostic factors, validated to be taken into account in clinical practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document