scholarly journals Long-term Outcomes and Quality of Life Following Parotidectomy for Benign Disease: A Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michaela Plath ◽  
Matthias Sand Sand ◽  
Peter K. Plinkert ◽  
Ingo Baumann ◽  
Karim Zaoui
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Minor Problem ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Term Data

Abstract Backround:Parotidectomy may be burdened by numerous complications that may worsen subjects' quality of life (QoL). So far, the literature still lacks of long-term data (> 10 years) answering to the question what impacted the patients the most on QOL after parotidectomy compared to well-published short-term data.Methods:A prospective long-term follow-up study was carried out. Participants were divided into three groups concerning the follow-up: short-term (ST; 6 postoperative weeks), long-term (LT; 13 years postoperative) and short- and long-term (SLT) on same patient collective. QOL was assessed by the Parotidectomy Outcome Inventory (POI-8). Demographic and clinical data were collected from all patients. Operative reports were used to classify all parotidectomies as great nerve auricular (GAN) “preserving” or GAN “sacrificing” surgical preparations.Results:74 LT, 57 ST and 33 SLT patients were enrolled in this study. Hypoesthesia posed the major short- and long-term problem whereas facial palsy posed the minor problem. Pain (p < 0.01) and hypoesthesia (p < 0.001) significantly improved from six weeks to 13 years after parotidectomy as well as the overall POI-8 score (p = 0.04). The disease-specific impairment rate decreased from short (≈ 70%) to long-term (≈ 30%) follow-up. Sacrifice of the auricular nerve was associated with hypoesthesia in the ST-cohort (p = 0.028).Conclusion:To our knowledge, this study represents the longest follow-up of patients undergoing parotidectomy. Hypoesthesia significantly improved but still remains on long-follow-up without impacting QOL. As part of the preoperative informed consent, prolonged or permanent hypoesthesia should be explicitly emphasized.Trial registration:This study was prospectively approved and registered by the local Ethics Committee (Project Trial No: S-300/2007 and S-443/2018).

scholarly journals Long-term Outcomes and quality of life following parotidectomy for benign disease: A cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michaela Plath ◽  
Matthias Sand ◽  
Peter K. Plinkert ◽  
Ingo Baumann ◽  
Karim Zaoui
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Great Auricular Nerve ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Term Data

Abstract Background: Parotidectomy may be burdened by numerous complications that may worsen subjects' quality of life (QoL). So far, the literature still lacks of long-term data (>10 years) answering to the question what impacted the patients the most on QOL after parotidectomy compared to well-published short-term data.Methods: A prospective long-term follow-up study was carried out. Participants were divided into three groups concerning the follow-up: short-term (ST; 6 postoperative weeks), long-term (LT; 13 years postoperative) and short- and long-term (SLT) on same patient collective. QOL was assessed by the Parotidectomy Outcome Inventory (POI-8). Demographic and clinical data were collected from all patients. Operative reports were used to classify all parotidectomies as great auricular nerve (GAN) “preserving” or GAN “sacrificing” surgical preparations.Results: 74 LT, 57 ST and 33 SLT patients were enrolled in this study. Hypoesthesia posed the major short- and long-term problem whereas facial palsy posed the minor problem. Pain (p < 0.01) and hypoesthesia (p < 0.001) significantly improved from six weeks to 13 years after parotidectomy as well as the overall POI-8 score (p = 0.04). The disease-specific impairment rate decreased from short (» 70%) to long-term (» 30%) follow-up. Sacrifice of the auricular nerve was associated with hypoesthesia in the ST-cohort (p = 0.028).Conclusion: To our knowledge, this study represents the longest follow-up of patients undergoing parotidectomy. Hypoesthesia significantly improved but still remains on long-follow-up without impacting QOL. As part of the preoperative informed consent, prolonged or permanent hypoesthesia should be explicitly emphasized.Trial registration: This study was prospectively approved and registered by the local Ethics Committee (Project Trial No: S-300/2007 and S-443/2018).

scholarly journals Short- and Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients with Benign Esophageal Perforation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Brinkmann ◽  
Laura Knepper ◽  
Hans Friedrich Fuchs ◽  
Arnulf Heinrich Hoelscher ◽  
Kathrin Kuhr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Esophageal Perforation ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Quality Of Life Index ◽  
Short And Long Term

Abstract Background Esophageal perforation is associated with high morbidity and mortality. In addition to surgical treatment, endoscopic endoluminal stent placement and endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) are established methods in the management of this emergency condition. As health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is becoming a major issue in the evaluation of any therapeutic intervention not much is known about HRQoL, particular in the long-term follow-up of patients treated for benign esophageal perforation with different treatment strategies. Methods Patients treated for benign esophageal perforation at the University Hospital Cologne from January 2003 to December 2014 were included. Primary outcome and management of esophageal perforation were documented and long-term quality of life was assessed using the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), the Health-Related Quality of Life Index (HRQL) for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires for general and esophageal cancer specific QoL (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18). . Results 58 patients were included in the study. Based on primary treatment patients were divided into an endoscopic (n = 27; 46.6%), surgical (n = 20; 34.5%) and conservative group (n = 11; 19%). Short- and long-term outcome, as well as quality of life were compared. HRQoL was measured after a median follow-up of 49 months HRQoL was generally reduced in patients with benign esophageal perforation. Endoscopically treated patients showed the highest GIQLI overall score and highest EORTC general health status, followed by the conservative and the surgical group. Conclusion HRQoL in patients with benign esophageal perforation is reduced even in the long-term follow-up. Temporary stent or EVT is effective and provides a good alternative to surgery not only in the short-term but also in the long-term follow-up.

scholarly journals Short- and long-term follow-up of patients with non-neoplastic esophageal perforation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Brinkmann ◽  
Laura Knepper ◽  
Hans Fuchs ◽  
Arnulf Hoelscher ◽  
Kathrin Kuhr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Esophageal Perforation ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Quality Of Life Index ◽  
Short And Long Term

Abstract Purpose Esophageal perforation is associated with high morbidity and mortality. In addition to surgical treatment, endoscopic endoluminal stent placement and endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) are established methods in the management of this emergency condition. Although health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is becoming a major issue in the evaluation of any therapeutic intervention, not much is known about HRQoL, particularly in the long-term follow-up of patients treated for non-neoplastic esophageal perforation with different treatment strategies. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients’ outcome after non-neoplastic esophageal perforation with focus on HRQoL in the long-term follow-up. Methods Patients treated for non-neoplastic esophageal perforation at the University Hospital Cologne from January 2003 to December 2014 were included. Primary outcome and management of esophageal perforation were documented. Long-term quality of life was assessed using the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), the Health-Related Quality of Life Index (HRQL) for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires for general and esophageal specific QoL (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18). Results Fifty-eight patients were included in the study. Based on primary treatment, patients were divided into an endoscopic (n = 27; 46.6%), surgical (n = 20; 34.5%), and a conservative group (n = 11; 19%). Short- and long-term outcome and quality of life were compared. HRQoL was measured after a median follow-up of 49 months. HRQoL was generally reduced in patients with non-neoplastic esophageal perforation. Endoscopically treated patients showed the highest GIQLI overall score and highest EORTC general health status, followed by the conservative and the surgical group. Conclusion HRQoL in patients with non-neoplastic esophageal perforation is reduced even in the long-term follow-up. Temporary stent or EVT is effective and provides a good alternative to surgery, not only in the short-term but also in the long-term follow-up.

Long term follow-up in quality of life after mitral valve surgery

2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Kammerer ◽  
M Höhn ◽  
AH Kiessling ◽  
S Becker ◽  
FU Sack
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Mitral Valve ◽  
Mitral Valve Surgery ◽  
Valve Surgery ◽  
Long Term Follow Up
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document