scholarly journals The Effect of Acromioplasty or Bursectomy on the Results of Arthroscopic Repair of Full Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Does the Acromion Type Affect These Results?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozgun Karakus ◽  
Ahmet Sinan Sari
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Subacromial Decompression ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Decompression Procedure ◽  
Group B ◽  
Cuff Repair

Abstract Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of subacromial decompression on the results of full thickness rotator cuff repair applied arthroscopically. Examination was also made of the effect of acromion type on the subacromial decompression procedure in patients applied with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Materials and Methods: The study included a total of 150 patients, comprising 102 (68%) females and 48 (32%) males with a full thickness rotator cuff tear repaired arthroscopically. The patients were separated into 3 groups of 50. Group A comprised those with acromioplasty and bursectomy applied additional to the repair. In Group B, only bursectomy was performed additional to the repair and in Group C, only rotator cuff repair was applied. Evaluation was made of the postoperative long-term pain and functional results. Results: The mean age of the cases was 65.63±9.22 years (range, 46-86 years). The affected side was right side in 95 (63.3%) cases and left side in 55 (36.7%). No statistically significant difference was determined between the groups according to the postoperative Constant Murley and ASES scores (p>0.05). In the paired comparisons, the postoperative VAS scores of Group C were higher than those of Groups A and B (p=0.018, p=0.029, p<0.05). No statistically significant difference was determined between Group A and Group B in respect of the postoperative VAS scores (p>0.05). Conclusions: In the arthroscopic repair of full thickness rotator cuff tears, neither acromioplasty, coraco-acromial ligament loosening nor bursectomy were determined to have any positive effect on the results. Whatever the acromion type, there is no need for an additional subacromial decompression procedure after rotator cuff repair, in respect of pain and functional outcomes. Only acromial spurs should be gently removed paying attention to the coraco-acromial ligament.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without subacromial decompression is safe and effective: a clinical study

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Umile Giuseppe Longo ◽  
Stefano Petrillo ◽  
Vincenzo Candela ◽  
Giacomo Rizzello ◽  
Mattia Loppini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Subacromial Decompression ◽  
Group A ◽  
Ucla Score ◽  
Decompression Procedure ◽  
Group B ◽  
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Shoulder Score

Abstract Background Subacromial decompression, that consists of the release of the coracoid-acromial ligament, subacromial bursectomy and anterior-inferior acromioplasty, has traditionally been performed in the management of this pathology. However, the purpose of subacromial decompression procedure is not clearly explained. Our reaserch aimed to analyse the differences among the outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) made with suture anchors, with or without the subacromial decompression procedure. Methods 116 shoulders of 107 patients affected by rotator cuff (RC) tear were treated with Arthroscopic RCR. In 54 subjectes, the arthroscopic RCR and the subacromial decompression procedure (group A) were executed, whereas 53 took only arthroscopic RCR (group B). Clinical outcomes were evaluated through the use of the modified UCLA shoulder rating system, Wolfgang criteria shoulder score and Oxford shoulder score (OSS). Functional outcomes were assessed utilizing active and passive range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder, and muscle strength. The duration of the follow up and the configuration of the acromion were used to realize the comparison between the two groups. Results In patients with 2 to 5 year follow up, UCLA score resulted greater in group A patients. In subjectes with longer than five years of follow up, group B patients showed considerably greater UCLA score and OSS if related with group A patients. In subjectes that had the type II acromion, group B patients presented a significant greater strength in external rotation. Conclusion The long term clinical outcomes resulted significantly higher in patients treated only with RCR respect the ones in patients underwent to RCR with subacromial decompression.

All-Suture Anchor Settling After Arthroscopic Repair of Small and Medium Rotator Cuff Tears

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (14) ◽  
pp. 3483-3490
Author(s):  
Kyunghan Ro ◽  
Sung-Min Rhee ◽  
Jung Youn Kim ◽  
Myung Seo Kim ◽  
Jong Dae Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Suture Anchor ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tendon ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: All-suture anchors are increasingly being used in rotator cuff repair. However, there are debates on the micromotion of all-suture anchors. Purpose: To perform rotator cuff repair on patients with rotator cuff tears and different shoulder bone mineral densities (BMDs) and investigate (1) where the anchor is located under the cortex, (2) if there is any anchor migration settling during follow-up, and (3) if structural outcome differs according to shoulder BMD. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We retrospectively investigated 88 patients who underwent arthroscopic single-row repair for small- to medium-sized rotator cuff tears (age [mean ± SD], 58.8 ± 7.1 years) from 712 cases of rotator cuff tendon repair between November 2015 and February 2018. Inclusion criteria were as follows: use of an all-suture anchor; preoperative shoulder BMD; and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conducted preoperatively, 2 days after surgery, and 10 months after surgery. Patients were excluded from the study if they underwent open rotator cuff repair (n = 118), got surgery with a double-row technique (n = 178), underwent surgery with anchors other than the all-suture type (n = 273), received anchor insertion in sites other than the greater tuberosity owing to concomitant procedures such as biceps tenodesis and subscapularis repair (n = 29), did not take preoperative shoulder BMD (n = 15), had more than a large-size tear (n = 6), and were lost to follow-up (n = 5). After compression of the all-suture anchor during surgery, the strands were pulled multiple times to ensure that the anchor was fixed onto the bone with appropriate tension. BMD was measured before surgery. Depth to anchor (DA), anchor settling, and repaired rotator cuff integrity were measured with MRI. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: group A (BMD, <0.4 g/cm2; n = 31), group B (BMD, 0.4-0.6 g/cm2; n = 32), and group C (BMD, >0.6 g/cm2; n = 25). A total of 65 patients had follow-up MRI. On the basis of rotator cuff tendon integrity, patients were categorized into either a sufficient thickness group (group S, Sugaya classification grade II or lower; n = 44) or an insufficient thickness group (group I, Sugaya classification grade III or higher; n = 21). Results: On time-zero MRI, the DA differed significantly among groups (group A, 3.62 ± 2.02 mm; group B, 5.18 ± 2.13 mm; group C, 6.30 ± 3.34 mm) ( P = .001). The DA was deeper in patients with a higher BMD at time zero ( r = 0.374; P = .001), but the DA did not differ at follow-up MRI (mean, 10.3 months after surgery). On follow-up MRI, anchor settling tended to increase with deeper time-zero DA ( r = 0.769; P < .001). Anchor settling was significantly different among groups (group A, 1.33 ± 1.08 mm; group B, 2.78 ± 1.99 mm; group C, 3.81 ± 2.19 mm) ( P = .001). The proportion of patients with sufficient thickness in each group did not show a statistical difference (group A, 70.8%; group B, 72.7%; group C, 57.9%) ( P = .550). Conclusion: In conclusion, this study confirmed that the postoperative site of anchor insertion in arthroscopic single-row rotator cuff repair with all-suture anchors was located farther from the cortex in patients with higher shoulder BMD and closer to the subcortical bone in patients with lower BMD. On follow-up MRI, no further settling occurred past a certain distance from the cortex, and there was no significant difference in anchor depth or integrity of the rotator cuff tendon based on shoulder BMD. Therefore, minimal settling in the all-suture anchor did not show clinical significance.

scholarly journals Outcome and Structural Integrity of Rotator Cuff after Arthroscopic Treatment of Large and Massive Tears with Double Row Technique: A 2-Year Followup

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignacio Carbonel ◽  
Angel A. Martínez ◽  
Elisa Aldea ◽  
Jorge Ripalda ◽  
Antonio Herrera
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Massive Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Cuff Repair

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome and the tendon healing after arthroscopic double row rotator cuff repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears.Methods. 82 patients with a full-thickness large and massive rotator cuff tear underwent arthroscopic repair with double row technique. Results were evaluated by use of the UCLA, ASES, and Constant questionnaires, the Shoulder Strength Index (SSI), and range of motion. Follow-up time was 2 years. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies were performed on each shoulder preoperatively and 2 years after repair.Results. 100% of the patients were followed up. UCLA, ASES, and Constant questionnaires showed significant improvement compared with preoperatively (P<0.001). Range of motion and SSI in flexion, abduction, and internal and external rotation also showed significant improvement (P<0.001). MRI studies showed 24 cases of tear after repair (29%). Only 8 cases were a full-thickness tear.Conclusions. At two years of followup, in large and massive rotator cuff tears, an arthroscopic double row rotator cuff repair technique produces an excellent functional outcome and structural integrity.

scholarly journals Epidemiological Analysis of Changes in Clinical Practice for Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears From 2010 to 2015

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596711984591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avinesh Agarwalla ◽  
Gregory L. Cvetanovich ◽  
Anirudh K. Gowd ◽  
Anthony A. Romeo ◽  
Brian J. Cole ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Rotator Cuff Injuries ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Corticosteroid Injections

Background: Rotator cuff injuries are a leading cause of shoulder disability among adults. Surgical intervention is a common treatment modality; however, conservative management has been described for the treatment of rotator cuff tears. As the cost of health care increases, the industry has shifted to optimizing patient outcomes, reducing readmissions, and reducing expenditure. In 2010, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons created clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to guide the management of rotator cuff injuries. Since their publication, there have been several randomized controlled trials assessing the management of rotator cuff injuries. Purpose: To quantitatively describe changes in the management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears over time with regard to the publication of the CPGs and prospective clinical trials. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Included in the study were Humana-insured patients in the PearlDiver database with the diagnosis of a full-thickness rotator cuff tear from 2010 to 2015. Patients undergoing rotator cuff repair (CPT-29827, CPT-23410, CPT-23412, CPT-23420) and patients undergoing nonoperative management in the queried years were identified. The incidence of physical therapy (PT), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and corticosteroid injections was assessed. Results: In 2015, patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears were less likely to receive a corticosteroid injection (16.5% vs 23.9%, respectively; odds ratio [OR], 0.6; P < .001) or undergo PT (7.8% vs 12.1%, respectively; OR, 0.6; P < .001) before rotator cuff repair in comparison with 2010. Additionally, patients were no more likely to be prescribed NSAIDs before rotator cuff repair in 2015 in comparison with 2010 (OR, 1.0; P = .6). Patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears were less likely to undergo acromioplasty in 2015 in comparison with 2010 (48.2% vs 76.9%, respectively; OR, 0.4; P < .001); however, the rate of concomitant biceps tenodesis slightly increased (14.8% vs 14.6%, respectively; OR, 1.1; P = .01). Conclusion: From 2010 to 2015, there were changes in the management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears, including decreased preoperative utilization of corticosteroid injections and PT as well as a decrease in concomitant acromioplasty, and the rate of biceps tenodesis slightly increased. As CPGs and prospective investigations continue to proliferate, management practices of patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears continue to evolve.

scholarly journals The Effect of Time Interval from MRI to Rotator Cuff Repair on Tear Size: Imaged vs. Actual Tear Size

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0027
Author(s):  
Amanda J. Naylor ◽  
Michael D. Charles ◽  
Allison Jamie Rao ◽  
Gregory Louis Cvetanovich ◽  
Michael C. O’Brien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Critical Time ◽  
T Test ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Tear Size

Objectives: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the advanced imaging modality of choice for the evaluation and diagnosis of full thickness rotator cuff tears (RCT). Tear size progression has been correlated with increasing pain. However, there is little data on tear size progression in symptomatic RCT with regard to time from MRI to actual rotator cuff repair (RCR). The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of time (from date of MRI measured tear dimensions to date of RCR measured intraoperative tear dimensions) on tear size progression. Methods: In the course of a study on physical examination manual muscle tests in patients with known full thickness RCT requiring repair, MRI was obtained for each patient undergoing RCR. Tears were measured intraoperatively in the Anterior-Posterior (A-P) and Medial-Lateral (M-L) dimensions with a graduated probe. Location (anterior, central, posterior in the supraspinatus tendon), area of the tear, and anterior band of supraspinatus status (intact/ not intact) were recorded.The preoperative MRI was evaluated by the same examiner blinded to the operative results at least 4 weeks after the RCR and the same parameters measured.There were 64 consecutive shoulders with 40 male, 24 female at an average age of 58 yrs (40-76) that had MRI and underwent RCR. The mean MRI dimensions were: A-P tear:16.53 mm (SD 9.70); M-L tear: 17.3 mm (SD 9.75); Tear area: 366.7 square mm. The average time from preoperative MRI to RCR was 107.3 days (range 12-399 days). Operative mean RCT dimensions were: A-P tear: 18.38 mm (SD 10.0); M-L tear: 14.06 mm (SD 8.15); Tear area: 307.7 square mm.Descriptive statistical analysis with two-sample T-test was performed to determine the temporal effect on tear size from date of MRI to the date of surgery, and whether there was a change.Patients were grouped in the following time cohorts based on the length of time elapsed between the preoperative MRI and date of RCR: ≤1 month, 1 month to 2 months, 2 months to 3 months, 3 months to 9 months, and ≥9 months. The delta, or difference between intraoperative measurements and preoperative MRI measurements, was calculated for each cohort. Results: The t-test revealed a significant time effect with regard to tear size between the MRI and the intraoperative measured tear requiring repair. This was significant for the A-P dimension (p<0.001), the Medial-Lateral dimension (p<0.001), and the total area of the tear (p=0.009). In an attempt to determine a “watershed” or critical time interval where MRI and RCT size correlated, an additional analysis was performed. The change in A-P tear dimension between MRI and RCR findings showed increasing delta with increasing time. Positive mean delta in A-P dimension was seen in the 2-3 month group (2.64), with larger differences seen in the 3 month to 9 month (5.89) and ≥9 month (7.3) groups. A similar trend was seen for mean delta values in the M-L dimension among the cohorts. Conclusion: In a consecutive series of RCTs undergoing repair, the measured MRI dimensions and the intraoperative dimensions were recorded and analyzed. A surgeon can have a level of confidence that the RCT size will correlate with MRI tear size within a certain time frame. There is a significant effect of time on tear size progression from MRI dimensions to actual RCT dimensions at time of repair.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Deltoid Origin Status Following Open and Arthroscopic Repair of Large Rotator Cuff Tears: A Propensity-Matched Case-Control Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-19
Author(s):  
Erica Kholinne ◽  
Jae-Man Kwak ◽  
Yucheng Sun ◽  
Hyojune Kim ◽  
Kyoung Hwan Koh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Arthroscopic Repair ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Lateral Border ◽  
Cuff Repair

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare deltoid origin status following large rotator cuff repair carried out using either an open or an arthroscopic method with a propensity score matching technique. Methods: A retrospective review of 112 patients treated for full-thickness, large rotator cuff tear via either a classic open repair (open group) or an arthroscopic repair (arthroscopic group) was conducted. All patients included in the study had undergone postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical follow-up for at least 12 and 18 months after surgery, respectively. Propensity score matching was used to select controls matched for age, sex, body mass index, and affected site. There were 56 patients in each group, with a mean age of 63.3 years (range, 50–77 years). The postoperative functional and radiologic outcomes for both groups were compared. Radiologic evaluation for postoperative rotator cuff integrity and deltoid origin status was performed with 3-Tesla MRI.Results: The deltoid origin thickness was significantly greater in the arthroscopic group when measured at the anterior acromion (P=0.006), anterior third (P=0.005), and middle third of the lateral border of the acromion level (P=0.005). The deltoid origin thickness at the posterior third of the lateral acromion was not significantly different between the arthroscopic and open groups. The arthroscopic group had significantly higher intact deltoid integrity with less scarring (P=0.04). There were no full-thickness deltoid tears in either the open or arthroscopic group. Conclusion: Open rotator cuff repair resulted in a thinner deltoid origin, especially from the anterior acromion to the middle third of the lateral border of the acromion, at the 1-year postoperative MRI evaluation. Meticulous reattachment of the deltoid origin is as essential as rotator cuff repair when an open approach is selected.

scholarly journals A Single Knotless-anchor for Bursal-side Ellman III Partial Thinkness Rotar Cuff Tears: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Liu ◽  
Baolu Zhang ◽  
Qian Zhao ◽  
Xiaoguang Guo ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Supraspinatus Tendon ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Loading Test ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Knotless Anchor ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background: Bursal-side partial thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCTs) are frequent lesions with the treatment of multiple surgical techniques. However, to the best of our knowledge, no single knotless-anchor with two Ethicon 2# repair technique has been reported.Methods: Bursal-side PTRCTs (Ellman type III, 75% thickness of tears) were created in the supraspinatus tendon on 16 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders. The specimens were randomized into two groups of 8 each: (1) Group A (Transtendon repairs), a single knotless-anchor repair with two Ethicon 2#, (2) Group B, the Conversion repair (Double-row, DR). Each specimen underwent cyclic loading test from 5 to 100 N by 50 cycles, then followed by an ultimate failure test. The displacement of greater tuberosity (mm) and ultimate (N) were recorded.Results: Compared with the load-to-failure test, there was no significant difference between Group A and B (Group A, 359.25±17.91N; Group B, 374.38±13.75 N, P＞0.05). There were also no significant differences in the rotator cuff displacement of 10 mm(Group A, 190.50±8.52N; Group B, 197.25±6.84, P＞0.05) and 15mm (Group A, 282.25±12.20 N; Group B, 291.13±14.74 N, P＞0.05). However, concerning the displacement of 3 mm and 5mm, we found a significant difference in these two groups (P<0.05).Conclusions: A single knotless-anchor with two Ethicon 2# for Bursal-side Ellman III PTRCTs is a simple, cheap, and effective technique that we could choose.

Defining Indications for Rotator Cuff Repair: Predictors of Failure of Nonoperative Treatment of Chronic, Symptomatic, Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. e28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Warren R. Dunn ◽  
John E. (Jed) Kuhn ◽  
Keith Baumgarten ◽  
Julie Y. Bishop ◽  
Robert H. Brophy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Cuff Repair

scholarly journals Shoulder-specific outcomes 1 year after nontraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 247-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Navin Gurnani ◽  
Derek F. P. van Deurzen ◽  
Michel P. J. van den Bekerom
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Constant Score ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Mini Open

Background Nontraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears are commonly initially treated conservatively. If conservative treatment fails, rotator cuff repair is a viable subsequent option. The objective of the present meta-analysis is to evaluate the shoulder-specific outcomes one year after arthroscopic or mini-open rotator cuff repair of nontraumatic rotator cuff tears. Methods A literature search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE within the period January 2000 to January 2017. All studies measuring the clinical outcome at 12 months after nontraumatic rotator cuff repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears were listed. Results We included 16 randomized controlled trials that met our inclusion criteria with a total of 1.221 shoulders. At 12 months after rotator cuff repair, the mean Constant score had increased 29.5 points; the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Score score increased by 38.6 points; mean Simple Shoulder Test score was 5.6 points; mean University of California Los Angeles score improved by 13.0 points; and finally, mean Visual Analogue Scale score decreased by 4.1 points. Conclusions Based on this meta-analysis, significant improvements in the shoulder-specific indices are observed 12 months after nontraumatic arthroscopic or mini-open rotator cuff repair.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document