scholarly journals Clinical Significance of Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion Index in Patients with Clinical Diagnosis of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. 

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Reza Yahyazadeh ◽  
Seyed Shahaboddin Izadi
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
International Prostate Symptom Score ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Urinary Flow ◽  
Postvoid Residual Urine ◽  
Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion ◽  
Maximum Urinary Flow

Abstract Purpose: To investigate the clinical significance of the intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) index in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients to clarify its diagnostic value in predicting the clinical and structural abnormalities of the prostate. Materials and Methods: In this descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study, we include every man older than 50 years old with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), predominantly voiding or obstructive, suggestive of BPH. The patients were evaluated to determine the following indices: IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) Index, QoL (quality of life), prostate volume (PV) and postvoid residual urine (PVR), serum PSA level, and the maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) obtained by uroflowmetry. Subsequently, the assessment of the IPP index was undertaken by transabdominal ultrasonography. The categorization of the IPP index was done into 3 grades: grade one (below 5 mm), grade two (between 5 and 10 mm), and grade three (greater than 10 mm). Results: The significant direct correlation between the intravesical prostatic protrusion and international prostate symptom score, quality of life, prostate volume, postvoid residual urine, and serum PSA as well as inversely with the maximum urinary flow rate was confirmed both before and after the medical treatment. Also, the need for surgical intervention increased significantly with increasing IPP levels. Conclusion: The intravesical prostatic protrusion can be used to evaluate and predict the severity of symptoms and outcomes in patients with clinical BPH.

scholarly journals Clinical Significance of Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghanshyam Sigdel ◽  
WK Belokar
Keyword(s):  
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Symptom Score ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
International Prostate Symptom Score ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Maximum Flow ◽  
Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Residual Urine ◽  
Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion

INTRODUCTION: Intravesical prostatic protrusion is a morphological change due to excessive growth of the median and lateral lobes of the prostate into the bladder in benign prostatic hyperplasia. It causes a 'ball-valve' type of obstruction during voiding. It is a useful parameter to assess the severity of the disease process, selection of treatment modality and its possible outcome in benign prostatic hyperplasia.MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, non-randomized, observational study was carried out from January 2014 to June 2014 in the Department of Urology, College of Medical Sciences, Nepal. Total of 50 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were evaluated to assess the correlation of intravesical prostatic protrusion with international prostate symptom score, prostate volume, maximum flow rate and post void residual urine. Correlation between parameters of interest was quantified with Pearson correlation test.RESULTS: A positive correlation was demonstrated between intravesical prostatic protrusion, international prostate symptom score, prostate volume and post void residual urine. There was a negative correlation between intravesical prostatic protrusion and maximum flow rate.CONCLUSION: Intravesical prostatic protrusion is correlated with international prostate symptom score, prostate volume, maximum flow rate, and post void residual urine volume and hence can be used to assess the severity of benign prostatic hyperplasia.Journal of Universal College of Medical Sciences Vol. 3, No. 1, 2015: 6-10

scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of photoselective vaporization of the prostate using the 180-W GreenLight XPS laser system in patients taking oral anticoagulants

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 1230-1237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alper Eken ◽  
Bülent Soyupak
Keyword(s):  
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
International Prostate Symptom Score ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Laser System ◽  
Urine Volume ◽  
Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Urinary Flow ◽  
Residual Urine Volume ◽  
Photoselective Vaporization ◽  
Maximum Urinary Flow

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the 180-W GreenLight XPS laser system for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients taking oral anticoagulants. Methods All consecutive patients admitted for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia from November 2012 to October 2016 and who underwent photoselective vaporization of the prostate with the 180-W GreenLight XPS laser were included in the study. The perioperative outcomes examined were the operating time, laser time, energy usage, and duration of postoperative catheterization. Functional parameters (International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urinary flow rate, and post-void residual urine volume), prostate volume, and serum prostate-specific antigen concentration were examined at baseline and 3 months. Perioperative complications, if any, were noted. Results All functional parameters (International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urinary flow rate, and post-void residual urine volume) significantly improved from baseline to 3 months. A small number of patients experienced at least one minor adverse event. There was no difference in the rate of adverse events between patients who were and were not taking anticoagulants. Conclusions Photoselective vaporization with a 180-W laser is an efficacious and safe treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia, even in patients taking anticoagulant medications.

scholarly journals Perineal Urethrostomy: Surgical and Functional Evaluation of Two Techniques

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolaas Lumen ◽  
Matthias Beysens ◽  
Charles Van Praet ◽  
Karel Decaestecker ◽  
Anne-Francoise Spinoit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
International Prostate Symptom Score ◽  
Urinary Flow ◽  
Functional Evaluation ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Urethral Strictures ◽  
Surgical Failure ◽  
Maximum Urinary Flow

Introduction. PU is an option to manage complex and/or recurrent urethral strictures and is necessary after urethrectomy and/or penectomy. PU is generally assumed to be the last option before abandoning the urethral outlet.Methods. Between 2001 and 2013, 51 patients underwent PU. Mean age (± standard deviation) was60±15years. Only 13 patients (25.5%) did not undergo previous urethral interventions. PU was performed according to the Johanson(n=35)or Blandy(n=16)technique and these 2 groups were compared for surgical failure, maximum urinary flow (Qmax), urinary symptoms, and quality of life (according to the International Prostate Symptom Score).Results. Both groups were similar for patient’s and stricture characteristics. Only follow-up duration was significantly longer after Johanson PU (47.9 months versus 11.1 months;P=0.003). For the entire cohort, 11 patients (21.6%) were considered a failure (9 or 25.7% for Johanson group and 2 or 12.5% for Blandy group;P=0.248). There was a significant improvement ofQmaxin both groups. Quality of life after PU was comparable in both groups.Conclusions. PU is associated with a 21.6% recurrence rate and the patient should be informed about this risk.

scholarly journals Body Mass Index and Risk of Prostate Volume, International Prostate Symptom Score, Maximum Urinary Flow Rate, and Post-Void Residual in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 155798831987038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bing-Hui Li ◽  
Tong Deng ◽  
Qiao Huang ◽  
Hao Zi ◽  
Hong Weng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Flow Rate ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Urinary Flow Rate ◽  
Urinary Flow ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Maximum Urinary Flow

The objective of this study was to evaluate association between body mass index (BMI) and prostate volume (PV), international prostate symptom scores (IPSS), maximum urinary flow rate ( Qmax), and post-void residual (PVR) of Chinese benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients. All newly diagnosed BPH patients between September 2016 and August 2018 were selected and 788 patients were included. According to BMI, the patients were categorized into four groups, while according to PV, IPSS, Qmax, and PVR, they were categorized into two groups based on clinical significant cutoffs. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions and a restricted cubic spline (RCS) were applied to explore the relationship of BMI with categorical PV, IPSS, Qmax, and PVR. Compared with normal BMI, obesity presented significant association with increased risk of larger PV (>80 ml) in both unadjusted and adjusted models (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.772, 95% CI [1.201, 2.614], p = .004; adjusted OR = 1.912, 95% CI [1.212, 3.017], p = .005); however, underweight or overweight did not present a significant connection with such risk. No significant effect was identified for BMI on IPSS, Qmax, or PVR in either unadjusted or adjusted model. Nonlinear test including BMI using RCS and adjusting for confounders showed no significance ( p > .05); however, a significant linear relationship was ascertained between BMI and the risk of larger PV ( p < .001). In conclusion, there was a significant linear association between BMI and the risk of larger PV in BPH patients. Hence, this suggests urologists should consider both BMI and PV when providing surgical treatment for BPH patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document