scholarly journals A Preliminary Multicenter Evaluation of Endoscopic Sublay Repair for Ventral Hernia From China

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Tang ◽  
Huiyong Jiang ◽  
Weidong WU ◽  
Tao Wang ◽  
Mengxiang Meng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Mesh Fixation ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Onlay Mesh ◽  
Sublay Repair ◽  
Space Separation ◽  
Ventral Hernias

Abstract Background For ventral hernia, endoscopic sublay repair (ESR) may overcome the disadvantages of open sublay and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair. This retrospective study presents the preliminary multicenter results of ESR from China. The feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of ESR were evaluated; its surgical points and indications were summarized. Methods The study reviewed 156 ventral hernia patients planned to perform with ESR in ten hospitals between March 2016 and July 2019. Patient demographics, hernia characteristics, operative variables, and surgical results were recorded and analyzed. Results ESR was performed successfully in 153 patients, 135 with totally extraperitoneal sublay (TES) and 18 with transabdominal sublay (TAS). In 19 patients, TES was performed with the total visceral sac separation (TVS) technique, in which the space separation is carried out along the peritoneum, avoiding damage to the aponeurotic structure. Endoscopic transversus abdominis release (eTAR) was required in 17.0% of patients, and only 18.3% of patients required permanent mesh fixation. The median operative time was 135 min. Most patients had mild pain and resume eating soon after operation. No severe intraoperative complications occurred. Bleeding in the extraperitoneal space occurred in two patients and was stopped by nonsurgical treatment. Seroma and chronic pain were observed in 5.23% and 3.07% of patients. One recurrence occurred after TAS repair for an umbilical hernia. Conclusion ESR is feasible, safe, and effective for treating ventral hernias when surgeons get the relevant surgical skills, such as the technique of “partition breaking,” TVS, and eTAR. Small-to-medium ventral hernias are the major indications.

scholarly journals A preliminary multicenter evaluation of endoscopic sublay repair for ventral hernia from China

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Tang ◽  
Huiyong Jiang ◽  
Weidong WU ◽  
Tao Wang ◽  
Mengxiang Meng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Mesh Fixation ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Onlay Mesh ◽  
Sublay Repair ◽  
Space Separation ◽  
Ventral Hernias

Abstract Background: For ventral hernia, endoscopic sublay repair (ESR) may overcome the disadvantages of open sublay and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair. This retrospective study presents the preliminary multicenter results of ESR from China. The feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of ESR were evaluated; its surgical points and indications were summarized. Methods: The study reviewed 156 ventral hernia patients planned to perform with ESR in ten hospitals between March 2016 and July 2019. Patient demographics, hernia characteristics, operative variables, and surgical results were recorded and analyzed.Results: ESR was performed successfully in 153 patients, 135 with totally extraperitoneal sublay (TES) and 18 with transabdominal sublay (TAS). In 19 patients, TES was performed with the total visceral sac separation (TVS) technique, in which the space separation is carried out along the peritoneum, avoiding damage to the aponeurotic structure. Endoscopic transversus abdominis release (eTAR) was required in 17.0% of patients, and only 18.3% of patients required permanent mesh fixation. The median operative time was 135 min. Most patients had mild pain and resume eating soon after operation. No severe intraoperative complications occurred. Bleeding in the extraperitoneal space occurred in two patients and was stopped by nonsurgical treatment. Seroma and chronic pain were observed in 5.23% and 3.07% of patients. One recurrence occurred after TAS repair for an umbilical hernia.Conclusion: ESR is feasible, safe, and effective for treating ventral hernias when surgeons get the relevant surgical skills, such as the technique of “partition breaking,” TVS, and eTAR. Small-to-medium ventral hernias are the major indications.

scholarly journals A preliminary multicenter evaluation of endoscopic sublay repair for ventral hernia from China

BMC Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Tang ◽  
Huiyong Jiang ◽  
Weidong Wu ◽  
Tao Wang ◽  
Xiangzhen Meng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Mesh Fixation ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Onlay Mesh ◽  
Sublay Repair ◽  
Space Separation ◽  
Ventral Hernias

Abstract Background For ventral hernia, endoscopic sublay repair (ESR) may overcome the disadvantages of open sublay and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair. This retrospective study presents the preliminary multicenter results of ESR from China. The feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of ESR were evaluated; its surgical points and indications were summarized. Methods The study reviewed 156 ventral hernia patients planned to perform with ESR in ten hospitals between March 2016 and July 2019. Patient demographics, hernia characteristics, operative variables, and surgical results were recorded and analyzed. Results ESR was performed successfully in 153 patients, 135 with totally extraperitoneal sublay (TES) and 18 with transabdominal sublay (TAS). In 19 patients, TES was performed with the total visceral sac separation (TVS) technique, in which the space separation is carried out along the peritoneum, avoiding damage to the aponeurotic structure. Endoscopic transversus abdominis release (eTAR) was required in 17.0% of patients, and only 18.3% of patients required permanent mesh fixation. The median operative time was 135 min. Most patients had mild pain and resume eating soon after operation. No severe intraoperative complications occurred. Bleeding in the extraperitoneal space occurred in two patients and was stopped by nonsurgical treatment. Seroma and chronic pain were observed in 5.23 and 3.07% of patients. One recurrence occurred after TAS repair for an umbilical hernia. Conclusion ESR is feasible, safe, and effective for treating ventral hernias when surgeons get the relevant surgical skills, such as the technique of “partition breaking,” TVS, and eTAR. Small-to-medium ventral hernias are the major indications.

scholarly journals A preliminary multicenter evaluation of endoscopic sublay repair for ventral hernia from China

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Tang ◽  
Huiyong Jiang ◽  
Weidong WU ◽  
Tao Wang ◽  
Xiangzhen Meng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Mesh Fixation ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Onlay Mesh ◽  
Sublay Repair ◽  
Space Separation ◽  
Ventral Hernias

Abstract Background: For ventral hernia, endoscopic sublay repair (ESR) may overcome the disadvantages of open sublay and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair. This retrospective study presents the preliminary multicenter results of ESR from China. The feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of ESR were evaluated; its surgical points and indications were summarized.Methods: The study reviewed 156 ventral hernia patients planned to perform with ESR in ten hospitals between March 2016 and July 2019. Patient demographics, hernia characteristics, operative variables, and surgical results were recorded and analyzed.Results: ESR was performed successfully in 153 patients, 135 with totally extraperitoneal sublay (TES) and 18 with transabdominal sublay (TAS). In 19 patients, TES was performed with the total visceral sac separation (TVS) technique, in which the space separation is carried out along the peritoneum, avoiding damage to the aponeurotic structure. Endoscopic transversus abdominis release (eTAR) was required in 17.0% of patients, and only 18.3% of patients required permanent mesh fixation. The median operative time was 135 min. Most patients had mild pain and resume eating soon after operation. No severe intraoperative complications occurred. Bleeding in the extraperitoneal space occurred in two patients and was stopped by nonsurgical treatment. Seroma and chronic pain were observed in 5.23% and 3.07% of patients. One recurrence occurred after TAS repair for an umbilical hernia.Conclusion: ESR is feasible, safe, and effective for treating ventral hernias when surgeons get the relevant surgical skills, such as the technique of “partition breaking,” TVS, and eTAR. Small-to-medium ventral hernias are the major indications.

scholarly journals A preliminary multicenter evaluation of endoscopic sublay repair for ventral hernia from China

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Tang ◽  
Huiyong Jiang ◽  
Weidong WU ◽  
Tao Wang ◽  
Mengxiang Meng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Mesh Fixation ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Onlay Mesh ◽  
Sublay Repair ◽  
Space Separation ◽  
Ventral Hernias

Abstract Background: For ventral hernia, endoscopic sublay repair (ESR) may overcome the disadvantages of open sublay and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair. This retrospective study presents the preliminary multicenter results of ESR from China. The feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of ESR were evaluated; its surgical points and indications were summarized. Methods: The study reviewed 156 ventral hernia patients planned to perform with ESR in ten hospitals between March 2016 and July 2019. Patient demographics, hernia characteristics, operative variables, and surgical results were recorded and analyzed.Results: ESR was performed successfully in 153 patients, 135 with totally extraperitoneal sublay (TES) and 18 with transabdominal sublay (TAS). In 19 patients, TES was performed with the total visceral sac separation (TVS) technique, in which the space separation is carried out along the peritoneum, avoiding damage to the aponeurotic structure. Endoscopic transversus abdominis release (eTAR) was required in 17.0% of patients, and only 18.3% of patients required permanent mesh fixation. The median operative time was 135 min. Most patients had mild pain and resume eating soon after operation. No severe intraoperative complications occurred. Bleeding in the extraperitoneal space occurred in two patients and was stopped by nonsurgical treatment. Seroma and chronic pain were observed in 5.23% and 3.07% of patients. One recurrence occurred after TAS repair for an umbilical hernia.Conclusion: ESR is feasible, safe, and effective for treating ventral hernias when surgeons get the relevant surgical skills, such as the technique of “partition breaking,” TVS, and eTAR. Small-to-medium ventral hernias are the major indications.

scholarly journals P053 COMPARISON OF CLINICAL OUTCOMES BETWEEN INTRAPERITONEAL ONLAY MESH REPAIR (IPOM PLUS) AND ENHANCED-VIEW TOTALLY EXTRAPERITONEAL REPAIR (ETEP) FOR VENTRAL HERNIAS

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Hirukawa
Keyword(s):  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Mesh Repair ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Incisional Hernias ◽  
Totally Extraperitoneal ◽  
Onlay Mesh ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Totally Extraperitoneal Repair ◽  
Hernia Size ◽  
Ventral Hernias

Abstract Aim We have been performing intraperitoneal on lay mesh repair (IPOM plus) as the standard laparoscopic procedure for ventral hernia in our department. We introduced enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal repair (eTEP) for ventral hernia repair in 2018, and have performed 31 cases so far. We compared the outcomes of IPOM Plus and eTEP at our institution. Material and Methods Ventral hernia cases who underwent surgery at our department between 2018 and 2020 were included in the study. The postoperative outcomes and complications of the IPOM Plus and eTEP groups were evaluated retrospectively. Results There were 12 cases of IPOM plus, and all were incisional hernias. There were 31 cases of eTEP, including 7 cases of primary hernias and 24 cases of incisional hernias. Transversus abdominis muscle release (TAR) was added in 24 cases. The mean hernia size was 6.6 x 7.9 cm with IPOM Plus and 8.0 x 10.1 cm with eTEP, and the average meshes size was 15.5 x 22.0 cm and 20.3 x 23.6 cm, respectively. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 7.8 days and 5 days. Postoperative complications included 1 case of mesh bulging and 1 case of recurrence in the IPOM Plus group, 1 case of seroma and 1 case of intestinal obstruction in the eTEP. Conclusions The surgical outcomes for ventral hernias up to 8 cm wide were similar for IPOM Plus and eTEP. The eTEP can insert a larger mesh and may be useful for wider hernias (>8cm).

scholarly journals Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair – Experience in A Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-109
Author(s):  
Md Ezharul Haque Ratan ◽  
Hasina Alam
Keyword(s):  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Ventral Hernia Repair ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh ◽  
Diabetes Status ◽  
Onlay Mesh

Background: Ventral hernias are common problem in surgical practice. Repair of hernia by a prosthetic mesh is a well recognized procedure. But whether the procedure is to be done by open or laparoscopic technique is still a topic of discussion. Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) hernioplasty is a newer technique in managing ventral hernia in our country. We are evaluating the usefulness of this procedure as routine operation for ventral hernias.Methods: All patients attending at Bangladesh Institute of Research & Rehabilitation of Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic disorders (BIRDEM) outpatient department (OPD) with ventral hernia were approached and counseled for laparoscopic IPOM, but only those who agreed were included in this study. Fifty consecutive patients underwent IPOM by a single surgeon. Preoperative evaluation was done rationally and surgery performed by standard laparoscopic method. Age, sex, diabetes status and additional procedures done were evaluated. Post- operative follow up period was from 3 months to 75 months and any complication or recurrence were noted.Results: We are reporting 50 cases of laparoscopic IPOM, over a time period of 78 months (April 2010- September 2016). Eleven cases were male, 39 female (M: F=1:3.5). 35 (70%) cases were diabetic, 15 (30%) were non-diabetic. Mean age of the patients were 47.7yrs (male 47.7+9.5 yrs, female 47.7- 2.6 yrs, diabetic patients 47.7+ 2.5yrs, non-diabetic patients 47.7-5.9yrs). Indication for IPOM was paraumbilical hernia 29 cases (58%), incisional hernia 14 cases(28%), multiple incisional hernia 2 cases ( 2 large defect in one case, 5 defects of varying size in another patient), umbilical port hernia 2 cases, paraumbilical along with incisional hernia 1 case, epigastric hernia 1 case, lumber hernia 1 case. In 48 cases (96%) polypropylene mesh and only in 2 cases (4%) dual mesh were used. In addition to IPOM procedure, in same sitting laparoscopic cholecystectomy was done in 8 cases, Dilatation & Curettage in 1 case and adhesiolysis in 7 cases. None of the case required conversion to open, neither was there any intra-operative complication. In one case there was recurrence . In another case there was false recurrence due to development of ascites. Four patients developed seroma which were managed conservatively.Conclusion: Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) hernioplasty has proved to be an effective surgical procedure for ventral hernia repair. It provides much benefits with low complications and conversion in experienced hands.Birdem Med J 2017; 7(2): 106-109

scholarly journals Ventral hernia from routine repairs to abdominal wall reconstruction: our initial experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 3348
Author(s):  
Sheetal Ishwarappagol ◽  
Rohit Krishnappa
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction ◽  
Tobacco Consumption ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Abdominal Pressure ◽  
Postural Stabilization ◽  
History Of ◽  
And Function ◽  
Ventral Hernias

Background: Loss of continuity of abdominal wall significantly affects the functions of protection of viscera, postural stabilization, and maintenance of intra-abdominal pressure. The newer understanding of abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) aims at restoring abdominal wall anatomy and function, instead of simply patching the defect. We want to showcase the changing trends and results in hernia repair at a Medical Institution.Methods: This is an observational retrospective study conducted in RRMCH, Bengaluru from July 2018-2019 including all patients with ventral hernia undergoing the specified hernia repairs.Results: A total of 54 patients with ventral hernias undergoing routine hernia repairs/AWR surgeries were retrospectively analysed. The overall mean age was 46.62±12.44 year. Majority subjects were females (n=37; 68.5%), and overweight (Mean BMI=28.07±3.01/m2). 14 patients (25.92%), all males, had history of tobacco consumption. There were 38 (70.37%) primary ventral hernias and 7 recurrent hernias. Overall mean defect size was 10.2±0.4 cm. Most frequently performed was open retro rectus Hernioplasty (n=18; 33.33%), followed by open Preperitoneal Hernioplasty (n=17; 31.48%), laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) (n=16; 29.62%) and open transversus abdominis release (TAR) (n=3; 5.5%). On statistical analysis, it was found that Open repairs had higher post-operative pain (p=0.0005), longer hospitalization (p=0.0002) and higher incidence of surgical site events (p=0.0134) when compared to Laparoscopic repairs.Conclusion: As known already, minimally invasive techniques of hernia surgeries are shown to have acceptable outcomes when compared to radical open surgeries. Newer techniques of AWR are being employed to routine cases in larger numbers, and not just for complex reconstruction, at most centres with acceptable outcomes. 

scholarly journals In vivo performance of intraperitoneal onlay mesh after ventral hernia repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 78 ◽  
pp. 105076 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izabela Lubowiecka ◽  
Agnieszka Tomaszewska ◽  
Katarzyna Szepietowska ◽  
Czesław Szymczak ◽  
Maciej Śmietański
Keyword(s):  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Ventral Hernia Repair ◽  
Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh ◽  
Onlay Mesh

scholarly journals EP.TH.652Use of the Proceed Ventral Patch (PVP) Mesh for Small to Medium sized defects in Ventral Hernia Repair over 10 years – Simple, Safe and Secure

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashwin Krishnamoorthy ◽  
LamChin Tan
Keyword(s):  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Ventral Hernia Repair ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Lightweight Mesh ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Single Centre Experience ◽  
Ventral Hernias ◽  
Laparoscopic Reoperation

Abstract Aims The Proceed Ventral Patch (PVP) has been in use since the late 2000s and is a self-expanding lightweight mesh patch comprised of multiple layers of absorbable and non-absorbable materials including polypropylene and polydioxanone. It is intended for use in all ventral hernias. We report our single-centre experience of using the mesh with primary outcomes being recurrence and reoperation for recurrence, readmission within 21 days for post-operative complications and discharge as day-case. Methods Retrospective review of case notes from 54 patients who were operated between October 2010 and November 2020 was undertaken. Patient characteristics were of a 2.1: 1 Male:Female ratio with a median age of 56 years old. 3 epigastric hernias and 51 paraumbilical hernias were repaired using either a 4.3cm or 6.4cm Proceed Ventral Patch. The size of the hernia defect ranged from 0.5cm to 4cm with a median defect size of 2cm for the 54 patients. Results There were no intraoperative complications. Two patients (0.04%) underwent laparoscopic reoperation for recurrence. Only one (0.02%) patient was readmitted within 21 days for a wound abscess which was drained and treated with a VAC dressing with satisfactory healing. The operations were split between nine different surgeons of varying expertise from ST5 level to Consultant level. Conclusions Ventral hernia repair with PVP is intuitive to learn and has low recurrence/complication rates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document