The 1984 ARI Survey of Army Recruits: Codebook for October 84/February 85 USAR (U.S. Army Reserve) and ARNG (Army National Guard) Survey Respondents

1986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy W. Elig ◽  
Glenda Y. Nogami
Psychiatry ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Ursano ◽  
James A. Naifeh ◽  
Ronald C. Kessler ◽  
Oscar I. Gonzalez ◽  
Carol S. Fullerton ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 33 (13) ◽  
pp. 820-824
Author(s):  
John W. Ruffner ◽  
D. Michael McAnulty

As a job performance aid, the checklist has been applied to a wide variety of organizational requirements such as task analysis, survey questionnaire development, office automation, and maintenance. Although there are many examples of checklists that have been developed for different organizational requirements, there has been relatively little research performed to evaluate the checklists. One reason for this may be the lack of an acceptable methodology and evaluation criteria. This paper (a) describes a methodology and the criteria developed to evaluate the checklist used to assess the management of aviation resources by Army Reserve Component training facilities and units and (b) summarizes the results of the evaluation. Army National Guard and Army Reserve aviators and aviation technicians used 5-point rating scales to evaluate the Detectability, Importance, and Criticality of the checklist items. A data base was developed to summarize the Detectability, Importance, and Criticality information. In addition, a graphic decision aid was designed to help military managers decide whether to retain, revise, or delete individual checklist items. The methodology and criteria developed for this research may be applicable in other organizational contexts, especially those in which there is a requirement to evaluate an existing checklist and a full-scale validation effort is not feasible.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Knotek-Smith ◽  
Jeffrey Gerald

This document describes the methodology used to evaluate the costs incurred by organizations involved in planning, programming, budgeting, and execution of the Army’s environmental programs and estimating those costs for future year planning cycles, this model is referred to as the Environmental Quality Requirements Model (EQRM). The EQRM is used to develop the budget positions as presented to Congress to obtain the Operations and Maintenance appropriations. These appropriations fund the Environmental Quality Program which includes Compliance, Conservation and Pollution Prevention requirements. The model encompasses the commands under the funding structure of the Deputy Chief of Staff – G9 Installations which includes the following: Installation Management Command, the Army National Guard, the Army Reserve Command, and the Army Materiel Command.


2013 ◽  
Vol 178 (10) ◽  
pp. 1078-1084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter L. Platteborze ◽  
Donald J. Kippenberger ◽  
Thomas M. Martin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document