Technology Maturity Assessment Methodology SDIO Systems SETA

1989 ◽  
Author(s):  
RIVERSIDE RESEARCH INST ARLINGTON VA
2015 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. 196-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Till Albert ◽  
Martin G. Moehrle ◽  
Stefan Meyer

Author(s):  
Mourad Messaadia ◽  
Hadrien Szigeti ◽  
Magali Bosch-Mauchand ◽  
Matthieu Bricogne ◽  
Benoît Eynard ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 551-558
Author(s):  
S. Faidi ◽  
A. Olechowski

AbstractCrucial in the design process, Technology Readiness Levels are a common form of technology maturity assessment. Studies suggest that the TRL scale can be subjective and biased. Automating the assessment can reduce human bias. This paper highlights important challenges of automation by presenting data collected on 15 technologies from the nanotechnology sector. Our findings show that, contrary to claims from the literature, patent data exists for low maturity technologies and may be useful for automation. We also found that there exists unexpected trends in data publications at TRL 2, 3 and 4.


2012 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 165-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matin Sarfaraz ◽  
Brian J. Sauser ◽  
Edward W. Bauer

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Gossett ◽  
Graham E. C. Bell ◽  
Steven R. Fox ◽  
Keith R. Bushdiecker ◽  
Richard Pousard, Jr.

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1399-1408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catalin Cioaca ◽  
Cristian-George Constantinescu ◽  
Mircea Boscoianu ◽  
Ramona Lile

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 387-391
Author(s):  
Michaela Bianca Vac Soporan ◽  
Vasile Filip Soporan ◽  
Gheorghe Batrinescu ◽  
Emanuela Cocis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document