Evaluations Using the Software Engineering Institute (SEI) Environments Criteria

1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Parker
1985 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. B. Carpenter ◽  
H. K. Hallman

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Lai ◽  
Cui Zhang ◽  
Senad Busovaca

This paper presents a highly flexible and expandable tool called 2-SQUARE in support of the SQUARE methodology for security and privacy requirements engineering developed by the Software Engineering Institute at Carnegie Mellon University. Security and privacy requirements engineering can be a daunting task even with the proper expertise. 2-SQUARE aims at making it straightforward to perform requirements engineering regardless of expertise by providing flexible workflows and process guidance. 2-SQUARE also facilitates communication between requirements engineers and stakeholders throughout the requirements engineering process.


Author(s):  
Terry F. Buss

Capability maturity models (CMM), an outgrowth of the decades-old quality movement, and originally developed by Carnegie Mellon University's Software Engineering Institute for the US Defense Department in the 1980s as a way to improve software engineering, has become the inspiration for similar models addressing every aspect of public management by governments around the world. CMM posits several evolutionary stages that organizations must pass through to achieve increasingly higher levels of capability in achieving quality. Stages are determined by research evidence, expert opinion, best practices, and evaluations. While CMM has produced some impressive gains, it has drawn criticism for lacking a theoretical underpinning, exorbitant costs, being somewhat subjective, and lack of success in many organizations. The field has no universal agreed upon standards, so it may be necessary to create an organization to study and vet various CMM applications. The field as it matures presents an excellent opportunity to study public management in the context of organizations employing CMM.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley Karouw

Model kematangan kemampuan atau Capability Maturity Model adalah salah satu pemicu pengembangan industri telematika, dalam hal standarisasi kemampuan pengembang perangkat lunak. KIPI merupakan suatu standar model kematangan kemampuan yang berlaku di Indonesia. KIPI diserap dari CMMI atau Capability Maturity Model  Integration yang dikeluarkan oleh Software Engineering Institute, SEI, dengan penyesuaian tertentu, menurut karakteristik industri telematika dalam negeri. Studi tinjauan perbandingan KIPI dan CMMI sebagai framework standar kematangan pengembangan industri perangkat lunak ini, memaparkan beberapa perbandingan langsung antara CMMI dan KIPI. Perbandingan KIPI dan CMMI merupakan hal penting untuk memahami keterkaitan setiap area kunci proses dalam setiap tahap kematangan dari masing-masing standar ukuran tersebut. Dengan memahami masing-masing area kunci proses, maka implementasi KIPI akan merupakan salah satu faktor penentu tumbuhkembangnya pengembang perangkat lunak dalam negeri menuju terwujudnya visi bangun industri telematika 2020.Kata Kunci: Model Kematangan, Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak, Model Proses, Area Kunci Proses,CMMI, KIPI


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document