Synthesis of Phosphorus Based Haptens for Monoclonal Catalytic Antibody Production. Phase 2.

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaiming Liu ◽  
Sudersan T. Tuladhar
2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Véronique Le Pêcheur ◽  
Laurence Spiesser-Robelet ◽  
Sandy Vrignaud

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to use the Preliminary Risk Analysis (PRA) method to assess the criticality of the different stages in the process of preparing parenteral nutrition bags for use in neonatal resuscitation and, if necessary, improve the handling of the process itself.: A functional analysis of the preparation process was carried out, and three main phases were identified: Phase 1 – Fielding the request; Phase 2 – Production; Phase 3 – Checks. Risks were mapped under 5 category headings (legal, environmental, physical, human and managerial). After the evaluation criteria had been identified, scenario descriptions were drawn up for each dangerous situation in order to ascertain the criticality level (C1–C3, C1 being the least critical) of the different risks and to seek out risk mitigation measures.: The PRA method identified 63 dangerous situations, 77.7 % of which had a very high level of vulnerability. The highest number of such situations was in the production phase. Seventy one scenarios were drawn up (19 for phase 1, 40 for phase 2 and 16 for phase 3, as the same scenario may occur in more than one phase). The study enabled a reduction in system criticalities: initially there were 6 C1 scenarios, 44 C2’s and 21 C3’s and following the study there were 45 C1’s, 26 C2’s and 0 C3 scenarios. The most significant initial risks were linked to environmental, managerial and human factors whilst the most significant residual risks were environmental or legal in nature.: PRA is a viable assessment method in the health sector and has enabled the establishment of new measures seeking to minimise risk levels in the preparation process of parenteral nutrition bags.


2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. e12585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah M. Gunter ◽  
Leroy Versteeg ◽  
Kathryn M. Jones ◽  
Brian P. Keegan ◽  
Ulrich Strych ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 215-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Léon Beauvois

After having been told they were free to accept or refuse, pupils aged 6–7 and 10–11 (tested individually) were led to agree to taste a soup that looked disgusting (phase 1: initial counter-motivational obligation). Before tasting the soup, they had to state what they thought about it. A week later, they were asked whether they wanted to try out some new needles that had supposedly been invented to make vaccinations less painful. Agreement or refusal to try was noted, along with the size of the needle chosen in case of agreement (phase 2: act generalization). The main findings included (1) a strong dissonance reduction effect in phase 1, especially for the younger children (rationalization), (2) a generalization effect in phase 2 (foot-in-the-door effect), and (3) a facilitatory effect on generalization of internal causal explanations about the initial agreement. The results are discussed in relation to the distinction between rationalization and internalization.


2018 ◽  
Vol 86 (08) ◽  
pp. 456-457
Keyword(s):  
Phase 2 ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  

Die Blockade von Serotoninrezeptoren, insbesondere des Serotonin-Rezeptortyps 5-HT6, als Zusatztherapie in Kombination mit Cholinesterasehemmer, hat in experimentellen Versuchen sowie in einer Phase-2-Studie positive Effekte bei Demenz gezeigt. Im Rahmen eines Phase-3 Entwicklungsprogramms wurde nun die Effektivität des selektiven Serotoninrezeptor-Antagonisten Idalopirdin bei leichter bis mittelschwerer Alzheimer Demenz geprüft.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document