scholarly journals Residual Effects of Manure and Compost Applications on Corn Production and Soil Properties

2004 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 442-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bahman Eghball ◽  
Daniel Ginting ◽  
John E. Gilley
2004 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bahman Eghball ◽  
Daniel Ginting ◽  
John E. Gilley

2021 ◽  
Vol 756 (1) ◽  
pp. 012060
Author(s):  
S H Husain ◽  
A Mohammed ◽  
H Y Ch’ng ◽  
S I Khalivulla

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kabal S. Gill ◽  
Sukhdev S. Malhi ◽  
Newton Z. Lupwayi

<p>Wood ash may be used to mitigate soil acidity and improve crop production. We compared effects of wood ash and recommended fertilizers on soil properties of a Gray Luivsol, crop yields and contribution margins in southeast Peace, Alberta, Canada. The CHK (no fertilizer, inoculation or wood ash), FRT (recommended fertilizers or inoculation), ASH (wood ash rate to supply amounts of phosphorus equivalent to the FRT treatment); and ASH+N (same as ASH + N fertilizer or inoculation) treatments were applied in 2006 and 2007. Their effects were studied from 2006 to 2014. Wood ash had all the essential plant nutrients, except nitrogen. Soil samples collected in 2007, 2008 and 2013 had or tended to have higher pH, P, K, Ca, Ca:Mg ratio, S, Cu, Zn and B levels for the ASH and ASH+N treatments than the CHK and FRT treatments. In the 2006 and 2007, the seed yields were ASH+N &gt; FRT &gt; ASH &gt; CHK. The seed yields in 2008, 2010, 2012, 2013 and 2014 were greater from both the wood ash treatments than other treatments. Extra contribution margin from the ASH+N over the FRT treatment was $751/ha, i.e. $97 Mg<sup>-1</sup> of applied wood ash. Overall, wood ash reduced fertilizer expenditure and improved seed yield, contribution margin and soil properties, with residual effects observed up to seven years and likely for few more years.</p>


2010 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 2151-2161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peggy S. Althoff ◽  
Stephen J. Thien ◽  
Timothy C. Todd

Soil Science ◽  
2011 ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ardeshir Adeli ◽  
Haile Tewolde ◽  
Dennis E. Rowe ◽  
Karamat R. Sistani

2003 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. ISHAQ ◽  
M. IBRAHIM ◽  
R. LAL

The residual effects of subsoil compaction (below 0.15 m depth) on soil properties, growth, yields and nutrient uptake by irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum) and cotton (Gossipium hirsutum) are reported. The study was initiated during 1997 on a sandy clay loam soil in a semiarid region of Pakistan. Results showed that the adverse effects of subsoil compaction on bulk density, penetration resistance, total porosity and air-filled porosity of soil persisted for at least four years. In the third and fourth years after the imposition of treatments, compaction decreased yields of wheat by 12–18% and by 7% for cotton. The corresponding reductions in nutrient uptake by wheat were 11–16% for N, 11–15% for P and 5–10% for K. For cotton, the values were 9% for N, 3% for P and 7% for K. Subsoil compaction decreased nutrient use efficiency by 16% in wheat and 5% in cotton. The reductions in water use efficiency were estimated to be 11% in wheat and 7% in cotton. Wheat root length density was also decreased in the subsoil.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document