scholarly journals A Multi-Period Bank-Run Model for Liquidity Risk

Author(s):  
Gechun Liang ◽  
Eva Lütkebohmert ◽  
Yajun Xiao
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 803-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gechun Liang ◽  
Eva Lütkebohmert ◽  
Yajun Xiao
Keyword(s):  

CFA Digest ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vassilis Efthymiou
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-107
Author(s):  
Pavla Klepková Vodová

Abstract The aim of this paper is to thoroughly evaluate the sensitivity of Czech commercial banks to a run on banks. Our sample includes a significant part of the Czech banking sector in the period 2006-2013. We use three liquidity ratios that we stress via a stress scenario simulating a run on banks accompanied by a 20% withdrawal rate of deposits.We measure the impact of the scenario by the relative changes of these ratios. The results show that, in spite of a decrease in liquidity, most Czech banks would be able to finance such a scenario. The financial crisis influenced bank sensitivity to a run, but with a significant time lag. The severity of the impact of the bank run increases with the size of the bank; large banks are the most vulnerable. The resilience of banks is also determined by their strategy for liquidity risk management.


GIS Business ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 43-53
Author(s):  
Eugenia Schmitt

The need to focus on banks funding structure and stress testing in an explicit way arose as a consequence of the crisis of past decades. Liquidity risks usually occur as a consequence of other kinds of risks, hence analysing scenarios in a prospective manner is essential for the assessment if the bank can fulfill its obligations as they come due and if its funding costs are appropriate. The structural liquidity risk and the degree of the liquidity mismatch can be measured based on the liquidity gap analysis, where expected cash-in- and outflows, divided in different time-buckets are depicted. The liquidity gap report (LGR) shows if a liquidity shortcoming appears in the future and how high is the amount a bank would have to pay, if any hedging were not possible. This paper shows how to build a comprehensive LGR which is the base for both, liquidity and wealth risk evaluation. To improve the accuracy of the forecast, the counterbalancing capacity will be incorporated into the LGR. This tool is a methodological basis for quantitative and qualitative risk assessment and stress testing.


2017 ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
محمد أحمد بني هاني ◽  
منى ممدوح المولا

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document