The Move Toward Risk Retention for Sponsors of Asset Backed Securities

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Artem Shtatnov
2014 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 82-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Willen

I evaluate the empirical premise and the economic logic of the Dodd-Frank Act's requirement that issuers of asset-backed securities retain credit risk.


Author(s):  
Steven L Schwarcz

Securitisation represents a significant worldwide source of capital market financing. European investors commonly invest in asset-backed securities issued in U.S. securitisation transactions, and vice versa One of the key goals of the European Commission's proposed Capital Markets Union (CMU) is to further facilitate securitisation as a source of capital market financing as a viable alternative to bank-based finance for companies operating in the EU. To that end, this chapter explains securitisation and attempts to put its rise, its decline after the global financial crisis, and its recent CMU-inspired revival into a global perspective. It examines not only securitisation's relationship to the financial crisis but also post-crisis comparative regulatory approaches in the EU and the United States.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Michael S. Finke ◽  
Eric Belasco ◽  
Sandra J. Huston

This paper reviews household property risk management and estimates normatively optimal choice under theoretical assumptions. Although risk retention limits are common in the financial planning industry, estimates of optimal risk retention that include both financial and human wealth far exceed limits commonly recommended. Households appear to frame property losses differently from other wealth losses leading to wealth-reducing, excess risk transfer. Possible theoretical explanations for excess sensitivity to loss are reviewed. Differences between observed and optimal risk management imply a large potential gain from improved choice.


2003 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 744-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Saayman ◽  
P Styger

While American investors have been able to buy mortgage-backed securities  since the late 1970s and asset-backed securities since the mid-1980s, investors  in South Africa have not become involved in this growing market.  Securitisation also spread to Europe, South America, Asia and Australia during  the 1980s. The first securitisation in South Africa was completed in 1989, but  since then only a few securitised products have been offered to the investment  community. The aim of this article is to investigate the reasons for the lack of  growth in securitisation in South Africa and to determine whether securitisation  will grow to be a significant market in South Africa. The methodology used  includes interviews held with investors, securitisation specialists and other  structured finance specialists from the banking community. Experience from  other countries is noted and included in this article


2012 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-237
Author(s):  
David Puskar ◽  
Aron A. Gottesman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document