Innovation and the theory of fields

Innovation does not just involve the creation of new products, but also includes the need for new kinds of processes and organizations. Field theory can help us understand why some innovations are more piecemeal and others more revolutionary. It explicitly links innovation to the process of the emergence, adjustment, and transformation of markets (conceived of as fields). To illustrate this perspective, the case of the transition in the U.S. from a mortgage market dominated by savings and loan banks to the emergence of mortgage securitization dominated by the government sponsored enterprises and the largest private banks, is explicated. Field theory helps us understand the logic of this transition and the myriad players and innovations that helped produce a large part of what we consider to be modern finance. The case also shows the limits of economic theories of financial innovation and the sociology of finance. I end with a discussion of how field theory can inform subsequent research on innovation.

Development of mortgage securitization infrastructure in the Russian Federation

Subject. This article examines the essence and current problems of the development of the mortgage securitization market infrastructure in the Russian Federation. Objectives. The article aims to determine the essence of the infrastructure of the mortgage securitization market, the process of its development, and identify modern areas of its further transformation in the Russian Federation. Methods. For the study, we used analysis and synthesis, classification, generalization, induction and deduction, structural analysis, and the methods of comparative, statistical, and dynamic analyses. Results. The article presents an original interpretation of the concept of Infrastructure of Mortgage Securitization Market as a complex of interrelated institutions involved in the transformation of mortgage loans into derivative financial instruments. The article defines further paths of development of this infrastructure by forming a single subject of monitoring and regulation of the mortgage securitization market on the basis of the DOM.RF financial development institution in the housing sector of Russia. Conclusions. The described essence of the infrastructure of the mortgage securitization market develops a framework of categories and concepts of the financial credit system.

Credit Supply and Housing Speculation

Credit supply expansion boosts housing speculation and amplifies the housing cycle. The surge in private-label mortgage securitization in 2003 fueled a large expansion in mortgage credit supply by lenders financed with noncore deposits. Areas more exposed to these lenders experienced a large relative rise in transaction volume driven by a small group of speculators, and these areas simultaneously witnessed an amplified housing boom and bust. Consistent with the importance of belief heterogeneity, house price growth expectations of marginal buyers rose during the boom, while housing market pessimism among the general population increased.

Globalization of mortgage-backed securities market in Russia: Legal impact on transaction economy

Research background: The exponential growth of mortgage lending has taken on increasing importance in development of securitization activities market for mortgage assets throughout the world. The difficulty of comparing mortgage-backed securities of different countries explained by varying national legal features is the reason why there is no international market for such securities. Since 2014, the mortgage securities market has entered the stage of nationalization; as a result, it slowed down and lost the necessary infrastructure, including its legal components. Since securitization of mortgage loans first originated and became common in developed economies, it is of interest to compare Russian and international experience of legal regulation of each transaction stage. Purpose of the article: The purpose of this paper is to analyze legal regulation features of mortgage securitization in different countries and their impact on economic characteristics of securities in order to develop a globalization strategy for this market. Methods: The study is based on open data from Russian, European, American, England Central Banks and uses methods of structural, statistical, dynamic analyses and abstraction which made it possible to form holistic and substantiated conclusions. Findings & Value added: As a result of research activities, key features of legal regulation of mortgage securitization transaction have been identified. Based on these findings, a strategy for globalization of mortgage securities market was proposed. It contributes to international cooperation development in the field of long-term projects financing, including support measures of mortgage lenders.

International Real Estate Review

This paper investigates two types of housing wealth effects: conventional housing wealth and collateral. We incorporate home equity extraction (HEE) and the influence of mortgage liberalization into the model in Campbell and Mankiw (1989). Based on U.S. data during the 1977Q1–2019Q4, our empirical results suggest that consumption is remarkably influenced by the use of HEE, rather than home equity. Furthermore, the rapid expansion of mortgage securitization significantly amplifies the collateral effect. Conditional on the use of HEE and the share of non-bank mortgage holdings, housing wealth has an average marginal propensity to consume (MPC) of 0.84 cents and a maximum MPC of 6.06 cents. In 2007, when market-based mortgage pools and issuers of asset-backed securities held more than 60% of home mortgages, the HEE shock explained for over 50% of the forecasting variance of consumption growth. The results provide evidence that with a focus on collateral value, lenders allow more equity withdrawal, which leads to higher consumption.

Mortgage Securitization and Shadow Bank Lending

We show how securitization affects the size of the nonbank lending sector through a novel price-based channel. We identify the channel using a regulatory spillover shock to the cross-section of mortgage-backed security prices: the U.S. liquidity coverage ratio. The shock increases secondary market prices for FHA-insured loans by granting them favorable regulatory status once securitized. Higher prices lower nonbanks’ funding costs, prompting them to loosen lending standards and originate more FHA-insured loans. This channel accounts for 22% of nonbanks’ growth in overall mortgage market share over 2013–2015. While the shock creates risks for financial stability, homeownership also increases.