The Asset Pricing Effects of UK Market Liquidity Shocks: Evidence from Tick Data

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Foran ◽  
Mark C. Hutchinson ◽  
Niall O'Sullivan
2014 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 85-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Foran ◽  
Mark C. Hutchinson ◽  
Niall O'Sullivan

2009 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 337-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald J. Balvers ◽  
Dayong Huang

AbstractWe consider asset pricing in a monetary economy where liquid assets are held to lower transaction costs. The ensuing model extends the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) and the consumption CAPM by deriving real money growth as an additional factor determining returns. Empirically, the two model versions compare favorably to other theoretical asset pricing models along several dimensions, supporting the traditional intertemporal asset pricing perspective. A value premium arises because value firms are sensitive to liquidity shocks but growth firms are not. Although no alternative factor drives out the money growth factor, the conditioning CAY factors of Lettau and Ludvigson (2001b) add explanatory power.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
J. Saleemi

In the literature of asset pricing, this paper introduces a new method to estimate the cost-based market liquidity (CBML), that is, the bid-ask spread. The proposed model of spread proxy positively correlates with the examined low-frequency spread proxies for a larger dataset. The introduced approach provides potential implications in important aspects. Unlike in the Roll bid-ask spread model and the CHL bid-ask estimator, the CBML model consistently estimates market liquidity and trading cost for the entire dataset. Additionally, the CBML estimator steadily measures positive spreads, unlike in the CS bid-ask spread model. The construction of the proposed approach is not computationally intensive and can be considered for distinct studies at both market and firm levels.


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaurav Kumar ◽  
Arun Kumar Misra

<p>Liquidity is said to be the lifeblood of stock markets. It has prominent implications for traders, regulators, stock exchanges and the listed firms. In recent years a huge amount of literature has emerged that deals with liquidity. This article classifies and organises the literature and provides a critical review of the frameworks currently available for modelling liquidity and its macroeconomic and firm specific drivers. Commonality and intraday behaviour of liquidity in various markets is discussed under the umbrella of market microstructures.  Subsequently, liquidity risk as a factor in Asset pricing is analysed taking various models in to consideration. Finally, the study reviewed the impact of liquidity on corporate finance decisions viz. dividends, firm valuation, stock split, capital structure etc.</p>


2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-212
Author(s):  
Robert Korajczyk

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-56
Author(s):  
Catherine Dwiputri ◽  
Vina Christina Nugroho

Purpose of this study is to obtain empirical evidence about the role of liquidity in asset pricing in the Indonesian stock market. This study compares the role of liquidity as a characteristic of stocks and liquidity as a source of systematic risk. This study uses a total of 280 sample companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2006 - 2016. In measuring liquidity, this study uses the proportion of zero returns and because liquidity predicts future returns and also moves according to the past. For this reason it is necessary to have innovations to avoid stationarity issues because of the high persistence in liquidity so we use ARMA structure in the portfolio as data analysis method. Data processing was performed using the Fama-Macbeth (1973) model. The results of this study prove that market liquidity has a negative influence on stock returns on the Indonesian market. Thus, the role of liquidity as a systematic risk has an effect on asset pricing on the Indonesian stock market.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document