scholarly journals Importin and vNEBD Control Meiotic Spindle Disassembly in Fission Yeast

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignacio Flor-Parra ◽  
Ana Belln Iglesias-Romero ◽  
Silvia Salas-Pino ◽  
Rafael Lucena ◽  
Juan Jimenez ◽  
...  
Cell Reports ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 933-941 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignacio Flor-Parra ◽  
Ana Belén Iglesias-Romero ◽  
Silvia Salas-Pino ◽  
Rafael Lucena ◽  
Juan Jimenez ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ye Jin ◽  
Joel J. Mancuso ◽  
Satoru Uzawa ◽  
Daniela Cronembold ◽  
W. Zacheus Cande

2015 ◽  
Vol 211 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-Ju Yang ◽  
Haruhiko Asakawa ◽  
Tokuko Haraguchi ◽  
Yasushi Hiraoka

During meiosis, the kinetochore undergoes substantial reorganization to establish monopolar spindle attachment. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the KNL1–Spc7-Mis12-Nuf2 (KMN) complex, which constitutes the outer kinetochore, is disassembled during meiotic prophase and is reassembled before meiosis I. Here, we show that the nucleoporin Nup132 is required for timely assembly of the KMN proteins: In the absence of Nup132, Mis12 and Spc7 are precociously assembled at the centromeres during meiotic prophase. In contrast, Nuf2 shows timely dissociation and reappearance at the meiotic centromeres. We further demonstrate that depletion of Nup132 activates the spindle assembly checkpoint in meiosis I, possibly because of the increased incidence of erroneous spindle attachment at sister chromatids. These results suggest that precocious assembly of the kinetochores leads to the meiosis I defects observed in the nup132-disrupted mutant. Thus, we propose that Nup132 plays an important role in establishing monopolar spindle attachment at meiosis I through outer kinetochore reorganization at meiotic prophase.


2005 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 439
Author(s):  
Ye Jin ◽  
Joel J. Mancuso ◽  
Satoru Uzawa ◽  
Daniela Cronembold ◽  
W. Zacheus Cande

2015 ◽  
Vol 208 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Fennell ◽  
Alfonso Fernández-Álvarez ◽  
Kazunori Tomita ◽  
Julia Promisel Cooper

Telomeres and centromeres have traditionally been considered to perform distinct roles. During meiotic prophase, in a conserved chromosomal configuration called the bouquet, telomeres gather to the nuclear membrane (NM), often near centrosomes. We found previously that upon disruption of the fission yeast bouquet, centrosomes failed to insert into the NM at meiosis I and nucleate bipolar spindles. Hence, the trans-NM association of telomeres with centrosomes during prophase is crucial for efficient spindle formation. Nonetheless, in approximately half of bouquet-deficient meiocytes, spindles form properly. Here, we show that bouquet-deficient cells can successfully undergo meiosis using centromere–centrosome contact instead of telomere–centrosome contact to generate spindle formation. Accordingly, forced association between centromeres and centrosomes fully rescued the spindle defects incurred by bouquet disruption. Telomeres and centromeres both stimulate focal accumulation of the SUN domain protein Sad1 beneath the centrosome, suggesting a molecular underpinning for their shared spindle-generating ability. Our observations demonstrate an unanticipated level of interchangeability between the two most prominent chromosomal landmarks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document