scholarly journals Nup132 modulates meiotic spindle attachment in fission yeast by regulating kinetochore assembly

2015 ◽  
Vol 211 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-Ju Yang ◽  
Haruhiko Asakawa ◽  
Tokuko Haraguchi ◽  
Yasushi Hiraoka
Keyword(s):  
Schizosaccharomyces Pombe ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Meiotic Prophase ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Meiotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Attachment ◽  
Kinetochore Assembly ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Monopolar Spindle ◽  
Meiosis I

During meiosis, the kinetochore undergoes substantial reorganization to establish monopolar spindle attachment. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the KNL1–Spc7-Mis12-Nuf2 (KMN) complex, which constitutes the outer kinetochore, is disassembled during meiotic prophase and is reassembled before meiosis I. Here, we show that the nucleoporin Nup132 is required for timely assembly of the KMN proteins: In the absence of Nup132, Mis12 and Spc7 are precociously assembled at the centromeres during meiotic prophase. In contrast, Nuf2 shows timely dissociation and reappearance at the meiotic centromeres. We further demonstrate that depletion of Nup132 activates the spindle assembly checkpoint in meiosis I, possibly because of the increased incidence of erroneous spindle attachment at sister chromatids. These results suggest that precocious assembly of the kinetochores leads to the meiosis I defects observed in the nup132-disrupted mutant. Thus, we propose that Nup132 plays an important role in establishing monopolar spindle attachment at meiosis I through outer kinetochore reorganization at meiotic prophase.

scholarly journals Telomeres and centromeres have interchangeable roles in promoting meiotic spindle formation

2015 ◽  
Vol 208 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Fennell ◽  
Alfonso Fernández-Álvarez ◽  
Kazunori Tomita ◽  
Julia Promisel Cooper
Keyword(s):  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Nuclear Membrane ◽  
Meiotic Prophase ◽  
Meiotic Spindle ◽  
The Sun ◽  
Spindle Formation ◽  
Domain Protein ◽  
Bipolar Spindles ◽  
Sun Domain ◽  
Meiosis I

Telomeres and centromeres have traditionally been considered to perform distinct roles. During meiotic prophase, in a conserved chromosomal configuration called the bouquet, telomeres gather to the nuclear membrane (NM), often near centrosomes. We found previously that upon disruption of the fission yeast bouquet, centrosomes failed to insert into the NM at meiosis I and nucleate bipolar spindles. Hence, the trans-NM association of telomeres with centrosomes during prophase is crucial for efficient spindle formation. Nonetheless, in approximately half of bouquet-deficient meiocytes, spindles form properly. Here, we show that bouquet-deficient cells can successfully undergo meiosis using centromere–centrosome contact instead of telomere–centrosome contact to generate spindle formation. Accordingly, forced association between centromeres and centrosomes fully rescued the spindle defects incurred by bouquet disruption. Telomeres and centromeres both stimulate focal accumulation of the SUN domain protein Sad1 beneath the centrosome, suggesting a molecular underpinning for their shared spindle-generating ability. Our observations demonstrate an unanticipated level of interchangeability between the two most prominent chromosomal landmarks.

Role of microtubules and microtubule organizing centers on meiotic chromosome elimination in Sciara ocellaris

1997 ◽  
Vol 110 (6) ◽  
pp. 721-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.R. Esteban ◽  
M.C. Campos ◽  
A.L. Perondini ◽  
C. Goday
Keyword(s):  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Chromosome Elimination ◽  
Male Meiosis ◽  
Meiotic Spindle ◽  
Monopolar Spindle ◽  
Meiotic Spindles ◽  
Cytoplasmic Microtubules ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Meiosis I

Spindle formation and chromosome elimination during male meiosis in Sciara ocellaris (Diptera, Sciaridae) has been studied by immunofluorescence techniques. During meiosis I a monopolar spindle is formed from a single polar complex (centrosome-like structure). This single centrosomal structure persists during meiosis II and is responsible for the non-disjunction of the maternal X chromatids. During meiosis I and II non-spindle microtubules are assembled in the cytoplasmic bud regions of the spermatocytes. The chromosomes undergoing elimination during both meiotic divisions are segregated to the bud region where they associate with bundles of microtubules. The presence and distribution of centrosomal antigens in S. ocellaris meiotic spindles and bud regions has been investigated using different antibodies. gamma-Tubulin and centrin are present in the bud as well as in the single polar complex of first meiotic spindle. The results suggest that spermatocyte bud regions contain microtubule-organizing centres (MTOCs) that nucleate cytoplasmic microtubules that are involved in capturing chromosomes in the bud regions. The distribution of actin and myosin in the spermatocytes during meiosis is also reported.

scholarly journals Disruption of Astral Microtubule Contact with the Cell Cortex Activates a Bub1, Bub3, and Mad3-dependent Checkpoint in Fission Yeast

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 3345-3356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvie Tournier ◽  
Yannick Gachet ◽  
Vicky Buck ◽  
Jeremy S. Hyams ◽  
Jonathan B.A. Millar
Keyword(s):  
Actin Cytoskeleton ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Astral Microtubule ◽  
Spindle Rotation

In animal and yeast cells, the mitotic spindle is aligned perpendicularly to the axis of cell division. This ensures that sister chromatids are separated to opposite sides of the cytokinetic actomyosin ring. In fission yeast, spindle rotation is dependent upon the interaction of astral microtubules with the cortical actin cytoskeleton. In this article, we show that addition of Latrunculin A, which prevents spindle rotation, delays the separation of sister chromatids and anaphase promoting complex-mediated destruction of spindle-associated Securin and Cyclin B. Moreover, we find that whereas sister kinetochore pairs normally congress to the spindle midzone before anaphase onset, this congression is disrupted when astral microtubule contact with the actin cytoskeleton is disturbed. By analyzing the timing of kinetochore separation, we find that this anaphase delay requires the Bub3, Mad3, and Bub1 but not the Mad1 or Mad2 spindle assembly checkpoint proteins. In agreement with this, we find that Bub1 remains associated with kinetochores when spindles are mispositioned. These data indicate that, in fission yeast, astral microtubule contact with the medial cell cortex is monitored by a subset of spindle assembly checkpoint proteins. We propose that this checkpoint ensures spindles are properly oriented before anaphase takes place.

scholarly journals Spindle checkpoint activation at meiosis I advances anaphase II onset via meiosis-specific APC/C regulation

2008 ◽  
Vol 182 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayumu Yamamoto ◽  
Kenji Kitamura ◽  
Daisuke Hihara ◽  
Yukinobu Hirose ◽  
Satoshi Katsuyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Degradation ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Related Factor ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Yeast Meiosis ◽  
Meiosis I

During mitosis, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) inhibits the Cdc20-activated anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/CCdc20), which promotes protein degradation, and delays anaphase onset to ensure accurate chromosome segregation. However, the SAC function in meiotic anaphase regulation is poorly understood. Here, we examined the SAC function in fission yeast meiosis. As in mitosis, a SAC factor, Mad2, delayed anaphase onset via Slp1 (fission yeast Cdc20) when chromosomes attach to the spindle improperly. However, when the SAC delayed anaphase I, the interval between meiosis I and II shortened. Furthermore, anaphase onset was advanced and the SAC effect was reduced at meiosis II. The advancement of anaphase onset depended on a meiosis-specific, Cdc20-related factor, Fzr1/Mfr1, which contributed to anaphase cyclin decline and anaphase onset and was inefficiently inhibited by the SAC. Our findings show that impacts of SAC activation are not confined to a single division at meiosis due to meiosis-specific APC/C regulation, which has probably been evolved for execution of two meiotic divisions.

scholarly journals CENP-A exceeds microtubule attachment sites in centromere clusters of both budding and fission yeast

2011 ◽  
Vol 195 (4) ◽  
pp. 563-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie C. Coffman ◽  
Pengcheng Wu ◽  
Mark R. Parthun ◽  
Jian-Qiu Wu
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Schizosaccharomyces Pombe ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Histone H3 ◽  
Kinetochore Assembly ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Attachment Sites ◽  
Histone H3 Variant ◽  
Architectural Models

The stoichiometries of kinetochores and their constituent proteins in yeast and vertebrate cells were determined using the histone H3 variant CENP-A, known as Cse4 in budding yeast, as a counting standard. One Cse4-containing nucleosome exists in the centromere (CEN) of each chromosome, so it has been assumed that each anaphase CEN/kinetochore cluster contains 32 Cse4 molecules. We report that anaphase CEN clusters instead contained approximately fourfold more Cse4 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and ∼40-fold more CENP-A (Cnp1) in Schizosaccharomyces pombe than predicted. These results suggest that the number of CENP-A molecules exceeds the number of kinetochore-microtubule (MT) attachment sites on each chromosome and that CENP-A is not the sole determinant of kinetochore assembly sites in either yeast. In addition, we show that fission yeast has enough Dam1–DASH complex for ring formation around attached MTs. The results of this study suggest the need for significant revision of existing CEN/kinetochore architectural models.

scholarly journals Shugoshin protects centromere pairing and promotes segregation of non-exchange partner chromosomes in meiosis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana Previato de Almeida ◽  
Jared M. Evatt ◽  
Hoa H. Chuong ◽  
Emily L. Kurdzo ◽  
Craig A. Eyster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Meiotic Prophase ◽  
Single Unit ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Model Systems ◽  
Meiotic Spindle ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Meiosis I

ABSTRACTFaithful chromosome segregation during meiosis I depends upon the formation of connections between homologous chromosomes. Crossovers between homologs connect the partners allowing them to attach to the meiotic spindle as a unit, such that they migrate away from one another at anaphase I. Homologous partners also become connected by pairing of their centromeres in meiotic prophase. This centromere pairing can promote proper segregation at anaphase I of partners that have failed to become joined by a crossover. Centromere pairing is mediated by synaptonemal complex (SC) proteins that persist at the centromere when the SC disassembles. Here, using mouse spermatocyte and yeast model systems, we tested the role of shugoshin in promoting meiotic centromere pairing by protecting centromeric synaptonemal components from disassembly. The results show that shugoshin protects centromeric SC in meiotic prophase and, in anaphase, promotes the proper segregation of partner chromosomes that are not linked by a crossover.SIGNIFICANCEMeiotic crossovers form a connection between homologous chromosomes that allows them to attach to the spindle as a single unit in meiosis I. In humans, failures in this process are a leading cause of aneuploidy. A recently described process, called centromere pairing, can also help connect meiotic chromosome partners in meiosis. Homologous chromosomes become tightly joined by a structure called the synaptonemal complex (SC) in meiotic prophase. After the SC disassembles, persisting SC proteins at the centromeres mediate their pairing. Here, studies in mouse spermatocytes and yeast are used to show that the shugoshin protein helps SC components persist at centromeres and helps centromere pairing promote the proper segregation of yeast chromosomes that fail to become tethered by crossovers.

Meiosis in a temperature-sensitive DNA-synthesis mutant and in an apomictic yeast strain ( Saccharomyces cerevisiae )

1977 ◽  
Vol 277 (955) ◽  
pp. 351-358 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Meiotic Prophase ◽  
Yeast Strain ◽  
Meiotic Spindle ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Restrictive Temperature ◽  
Yeast Mutant ◽  
Synaptonemal Complexes ◽  
Meiosis I

It is shown that in the temperature-sensitive yeast mutant ( Saccharomyces cerevisiae ) spo 11 at the restrictive temperature of 34 °C, (1) premeiotic DNA synthesis is nearly completely blocked; (2) the nucleus enters meiotic prophase indicated by the formation of axial cores and polysynaptonemal complexes; (3) the kinetic apparatus functions normally at meiosis I and II; (4) early spore formation occurs in nearly all cells but it is variable and all spores eventually degenerate. It is concluded that chromosome replication is not a prerequisite for the functions listed above. The apomictic yeast strain 4117 produces 2 diploid spores. It is shown that a diploid which produces 2-spored asci, synthesized from 4117, no. 5, and an adenine requiring strain (1) has a normal meiotic prophase with abundant synaptonemal complexes; (2) has only one meiotic spindle; (3) has spores which form red clones more frequently than normal or u.v.-treated vegetative cells form ade/ade red sectors through mitotic recombination. It is concluded that this apomictic yeast has main­tained meiotic prophase, but that one of the two meiotic divisions is suppressed.

scholarly journals Shugoshin protects centromere pairing and promotes segregation of nonexchange partner chromosomes in meiosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (19) ◽  
pp. 9417-9422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana Previato de Almeida ◽  
Jared M. Evatt ◽  
Hoa H. Chuong ◽  
Emily L. Kurdzo ◽  
Craig A. Eyster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Meiotic Prophase ◽  
Model Systems ◽  
Meiotic Spindle ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Meiosis I ◽  
Yeast Model

Faithful chromosome segregation during meiosis I depends upon the formation of connections between homologous chromosomes. Crossovers between homologs connect the partners, allowing them to attach to the meiotic spindle as a unit, such that they migrate away from one another at anaphase I. Homologous partners also become connected by pairing of their centromeres in meiotic prophase. This centromere pairing can promote proper segregation at anaphase I of partners that have failed to become joined by a crossover. Centromere pairing is mediated by synaptonemal complex (SC) proteins that persist at the centromere when the SC disassembles. Here, using mouse spermatocyte and yeast model systems, we tested the role of shugoshin in promoting meiotic centromere pairing by protecting centromeric synaptonemal components from disassembly. The results show that shugoshin protects the centromeric SC in meiotic prophase and, in anaphase, promotes the proper segregation of partner chromosomes that are not linked by a crossover.

Centromere Mapping Functions for Aneuploid Meiotic Products: Analysis of rec8, rec10 and rec11 Mutants of the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Genetics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 153 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle D Krawchuk ◽  
Wayne P Wahls
Keyword(s):  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Meiotic Division ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Mapping Functions ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Products Analysis ◽  
Meiosis I

AbstractRecent evidence suggests that the position of reciprocal recombination events (crossovers) is important for the segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis I and sister chromatids during meiosis II. We developed genetic mapping functions that permit the simultaneous analysis of centromere-proximal crossover recombination and the type of segregation error leading to aneuploidy. The mapping functions were tested in a study of the rec8, rec10, and rec11 mutants of fission yeast. In each mutant we monitored each of the three chromosome pairs. Between 38 and 100% of the chromosome segregation errors in the rec8 mutants were due to meiosis I nondisjunction of homologous chromosomes. The remaining segregation errors were likely the result of precocious separation of sister chromatids, a previously described defect in the rec8 mutants. Between 47 and 100% of segregation errors in the rec10 and rec11 mutants were due to nondisjunction of sister chromatids during meiosis II. In addition, centromere-proximal recombination was reduced as much as 14-fold or more on chromosomes that had experienced nondisjunction. These results demonstrate the utility of the new mapping functions and support models in which sister chromatid cohesion and crossover position are important determinants for proper chromosome segregation in each meiotic division.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document