Putting Right Holders in the Centre: Bolagsupplysningen and Ilsjan (C-194/16) - What Does it Mean for International Jurisdiction Over Transborder Intellectual Property Infringement Disputes?

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia Lundstedt
2021 ◽  
pp. 82-95
Author(s):  
Giancarlo Frosio

This chapter discusses intellectual property (IP) and extra-contractual liability by highlighting general comparative analysis issues within civil and common law systems, with some consideration given also to major theoretical clusters that might influence the different legal regimes. The chapter focuses on emerging issues of extra-contractual liability for intellectual property infringement in the platform economy, with special emphasis on copyright and trademark infringement, seeking to co-ordinate miscellaneous approaches from the United States (US), the European Union (EU), and selected European countries’ experiences. In doing so, this chapter highlights research and methodological issues related to limited harmonization at a regional level in secondary and extra-contractual liability doctrines when applied to IP. Finally, this chapter describes the World Intermediary Liability Maps (WILMap) as an attempt to provide consistency within a fragmented research framework while also presenting other miscellaneous endeavours seeking the same goal.


Author(s):  
Paul Torremans

This chapter discusses the enforcement procedures used in relation to intellectual property rights, the civil remedies that apply, and some issues which arise in relation to the gathering of evidence in intellectual property cases. It identifies three essential elements in the relationship between intellectual property rights and remedies. First, there are the traditional remedies headed by damages that are normally granted at the trial. Second, intellectual property infringement often requires immediate action or a pre-emptive strike. Finally, gathering evidence that is vital for the full trial in an infringement case.


2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-32
Author(s):  
Wonseok Woo

This paper investigates the economic impact of intellectual property infringement lawsuits on the values of both the plaintiff and the defendant firms in the information technology industry. Event study methodology is used to investigate the effect of the litigation on the stock market returns around the date of commencement as well as the date of termination. Our results suggest that the news of intellectual property infringement lawsuits was unfavorably accepted in the stock market for the defendants. On the other hand, abnormal returns for plaintiff firms around lawsuit commencement date were significantly positive, while those at termination date were not positive at a statistically significant level. We also found chat firms in other technology sectors have been influenced more by the intellectual property infringement lawsuits than chose in computer hardware & peripheral sectors.


Author(s):  
Хусейн Вахаевич Идрисов ◽  
Тамила Джониевна Мимулатова

Статья посвящена одному из важнейших вопросов, связанных с творческой деятельностью человека - охране и защите результатов этой деятельности. В работе приводится характеристика основных видов интеллектуальных прав, а также перечисляются средств охраны и защиты интеллектуальных прав. Кроме того, в рамках статьи приводится легальная дефиниция понятия нарушения интеллектуальных прав. The article is devoted to one of the most important issues related to human creative activity - the protection and protection of the results of this activity. The paper describes the main types of intellectual rights, as well as lists the means of protection and protection of intellectual rights. In addition, the article provides a legal definition of the concept of intellectual property infringement.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-313
Author(s):  
Peicheng Wu ◽  
Charlie Xiao-chuan Weng

The landmark eBay case in the US has noticeably influenced Chinese judicial practices concerning intellectual property injunctions. The injunctive relief in intellectual property infringement cases in China has witnessed a change from a traditional automatic-granting approach to a more equitable approach. However, there are still some issues, namely: the standards of awarding injunctive relief in intellectual property cases are unclear; the civil law tradition and procedure can create issues when applying for injunctions; and the scope of the injunction could be disproportionate in certain cases. In order to address these concerns, China needs to publish judicial interpretations to clarify that the eBay test can be applied to both preliminary injunctions and permanent injunctions. China should further polish up its civil procedure legislation to enable a permanent injunction to be effective immediately, even at the first instance, and to allow the parties to an intellectual property contract to have agreements on conditions of applying for injunctive relief. Additionally, Chinese courts should adopt a proportionate method in determining cases regarding intellectual property injunctions.


2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 977-989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Buss ◽  
Christian Peukert

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document