Single Muscle Fiber Proteomics in Mitochondrial Disorders Highlights Fiber Type-Specific Adaptations to Respiratory Chain Defects

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Murgia ◽  
Jing Tan ◽  
Philipp E. Geyer ◽  
Sophia Doll ◽  
Matthias Mann ◽  
...  

Cell Reports ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 2396-2409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Murgia ◽  
Luana Toniolo ◽  
Nagarjuna Nagaraj ◽  
Stefano Ciciliot ◽  
Vincenzo Vindigni ◽  
...  


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 537-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunah Jeon ◽  
Junghwa Choi ◽  
Hee Jaeng Kim ◽  
Hojun Lee ◽  
Jae-Young Lim ◽  
...  


2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 1805-1812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarika Srivastava ◽  
Francisca Diaz ◽  
Luisa Iommarini ◽  
Karine Aure ◽  
Anne Lombes ◽  
...  


2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex M. Noonan ◽  
Derek P. Zwambag ◽  
Nicole Mazara ◽  
Erin Weersink ◽  
Geoffrey A. Power ◽  
...  

Abstract Studies on single muscle fiber passive material properties often report relatively large variation in elastic modulus (or normalized stiffness), and it is not clear where this variation arises. This study was designed to determine if the stiffness, normalized to both fiber cross-sectional area and length, is inherently different between types 1 and 2 muscle fibers. Vastus lateralis fibers (n = 93), from ten young men, were mechanically tested using a cumulative stretch-relaxation protocol. SDS-PAGE classified fibers as types 1 or 2. While there was a difference in normalized stiffness between fiber types (p = 0.0019), an unexpected inverse relationship was found between fiber diameter and normalized stiffness (r = −0.64; p < 0.001). As fiber type and diameter are not independent, a one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) including fiber diameter as a covariate was run; this eliminated the effect of fiber type on normalized stiffness (p = 0.1935). To further explore the relationship between fiber size and elastic properties, we tested whether stiffness was linearly related to fiber cross-sectional area, as would be expected for a homogenous material. Passive stiffness was not linearly related to fiber area (p < 0.001), which can occur if single muscle fibers are better represented as composite materials. The rule of mixtures for composite materials was used to explore whether the presence of a stiff perimeter-based fiber component could explain the observed results. The model (R2 = 0.38) predicted a perimeter-based normalized stiffness of 8800 ± 2600 kPa/μm, which is within the range of basement membrane moduli reported in the literature.



2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nichola Z. Lax ◽  
John Grady ◽  
Alex Laude ◽  
Felix Chan ◽  
Philippa D. Hepplewhite ◽  
...  


1994 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 1301-1307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Dumitru ◽  
John C. King ◽  
William van der Rijt ◽  
Dick F. Stegeman


1982 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Gydikov ◽  
P. Gatev ◽  
G.V. Dimitrov ◽  
L. Gerilovsky


2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 445-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Y. Tsao ◽  
Jerry R. Mendell ◽  
Warren D. Lo ◽  
Mark Luquette ◽  
Jerome Rusin


2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa S. Krivickas ◽  
Ronan Walsh ◽  
Anthony A. Amato


Circulation ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 108 (19) ◽  
pp. 2423-2429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Lebrecht ◽  
Bernhard Setzer ◽  
Uwe-Peter Ketelsen ◽  
Jörg Haberstroh ◽  
Ulrich A. Walker


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document