The Grass Is Always Greener: Federal Grants and Yardstick Competition in Indonesia Local Government

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tengku Munawar Chalil
2002 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlon G. Boarnet ◽  
Amihai Glazer

1984 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Joseph Wallis

The relative importance of federal and local government was reversed between 1932 and 1940. This changing composition of government expenditures by level of government accounts for the rise of “big” government during the Depression. State governments expanded their fiscal activity, maintaining their share of total government expenditures. Utilizing data on federal grants and state and local expenditures, I find that the relative decline of local governments and sustained growth of state governments can be explained by the financial and administrative provisions of the federal New Deal programs.


1976 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred C. White ◽  
Wesley N. Musser

During the past six years, state-local government finance ranged from a situation of fiscal crisis in 1970, to a boom in 1972-73, and back to a crisis in 1974-75. This was far worse than any since the Great Depression. During the recession of 1970-71, rising state and local tax revenues and federal grants did not keep pace with increases in expenditures resulting primarily from inflation [21, p. 500]. More favorable conditions in 1972-73, though, saw researchers projecting large future surpluses for the remainder of the decade and calling for reductions in tax rates and increases in expenditures [11, pp. 364-366].


Author(s):  
Joseph J. Capuno ◽  
Stella A. Quimbo ◽  
Aleli D. Kraft ◽  
Carlos Antonio R. Tan ◽  
Vigile Marie B. Fabella

2003 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-210
Author(s):  
Gudmund Valderhaug
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document