Strategic Temporal Immediacy: How a Subtle Change to Managers’ Language and the Use of Video in Earnings Conference Calls Jointly Impact Investors’ Willingness to Invest

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Jackson ◽  
M. David Piercey ◽  
Elaine (Ying) Wang
Keyword(s):  
Conference Calls ◽  
Subtle Change

Buy-Side Participation and Information Production in Earnings Conference Calls

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Cen ◽  
Sudipto Dasgupta ◽  
Vanitha Ragunathan
Keyword(s):  
Information Production ◽  
Conference Calls

The Price of Silence: When No One Asks Questions During Conference Calls

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuping Chen ◽  
Stephan Hollander ◽  
Kelvin Law
Keyword(s):  
Conference Calls

What Does 'But' Really Mean? -- Evidence from Managers' Answers to Analysts' Questions During Conference Calls

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Palmon ◽  
Ke Xu ◽  
Ari Yezegel
Keyword(s):  
Conference Calls

Does Executive Temperament Supersede Disclosure Content? Evidence from Weather Effects during Earnings Conference Calls

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bill B. Francis ◽  
Wenyao Hu ◽  
Thomas Shohfi
Keyword(s):  
Conference Calls ◽  
Weather Effects

Who and What Drive the Investor Response to Earnings Conference Calls? An Analysis Using Sentence-Level Price Movement

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique Gomez ◽  
Frank Heflin ◽  
Joshua A. Lee ◽  
Jasmine Wang
Keyword(s):  
Conference Calls ◽  
Price Movement ◽  
Sentence Level

Product Market Competition and Disclosure Framing: Evidence from Earnings Conference Calls

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristian D. Allee ◽  
Chuong Do ◽  
Mikhail Sterin
Keyword(s):  
Market Competition ◽  
Product Market ◽  
Product Market Competition ◽  
Conference Calls

The Difference in Sensing Properties Towards Anions between Two Pyridinium Amide-Based Receptors with a Subtle Change of H-Bond Position

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 472-478
Author(s):  
Wei-tao Gong ◽  
Wei-dong Qu ◽  
Guiling Ning
Keyword(s):  
Fluorescence Enhancement ◽  
Small Difference ◽  
Fluorescence Emission ◽  
Subtle Change ◽  
Sensing Properties ◽  
Naked Eye ◽  
Recognition Ability ◽  
The Difference ◽  
L1 And L2

Two pyridinium amide-based receptors L1 and L2 with a small difference of H-bond position of the amide have been synthesized and characterized. Interestingly, they exhibited a huge difference in sensing towards AcO- and H2PO4 -, respectively. Receptor L1 was found to be ‘naked-eye’ selective for AcO- anions, while receptor L2 showed clear fluorescence enhancement selective to H2PO4 - anion. The recognition ability has been established by fluorescence emission, UV-vis spectra, and 1HNMR titration.

Concurrent Earnings Announcements and Analysts' Information Production

2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Driskill ◽  
Marcus P. Kirk ◽  
Jennifer Wu Tucker
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Announcements ◽  
Financial Analysts ◽  
Earnings Forecasts ◽  
Data Availability ◽  
Limited Attention ◽  
Conference Calls ◽  
Stock Recommendations ◽  
Rich Information ◽  
Sample Firm ◽  
Jel Classifications

ABSTRACT We examine whether financial analysts are subject to limited attention. We find that when analysts have another firm in their coverage portfolio announcing earnings on the same day as the sample firm (a “concurrent announcement”), they are less likely to issue timely earnings forecasts for the sample firm's subsequent quarter than analysts without a concurrent announcement. Among the analysts who issue timely earnings forecasts, the thoroughness of their work decreases as their number of concurrent announcements increases. In addition, analysts are more sluggish in providing stock recommendations and less likely to ask questions in earnings conference calls as their number of concurrent announcements increases. Moreover, when analysts face concurrent announcements, they tend to allocate their limited attention to firms that already have rich information environments, leaving behind firms in need of attention. Overall, our evidence suggests that even financial analysts, who serve as information specialists, are subject to limited attention. JEL Classifications: G10; G11; G17; G14. Data Availability: Data are publicly available from the sources identified in the paper.

Detecting subtle change from dense Landsat time series: Case studies of mountain pine beetle and spruce beetle disturbance

2021 ◽  
Vol 263 ◽  
pp. 112560
Author(s):  
Su Ye ◽  
John Rogan ◽  
Zhe Zhu ◽  
Todd J. Hawbaker ◽  
Sarah J. Hart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
Mountain Pine Beetle ◽  
Subtle Change ◽  
Mountain Pine ◽  
Spruce Beetle ◽  
Pine Beetle

scholarly journals Molecular Dynamics of Cobalt Protoporphyrin Antagonism of the Cancer Suppressor REV-ERBβ

Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 3251
Author(s):  
Taufik Muhammad Fakih ◽  
Fransiska Kurniawan ◽  
Muhammad Yusuf ◽  
Mudasir Mudasir ◽  
Daryono Hadi Tjahjono
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Protoporphyrin Ix ◽  
Binding Energies ◽  
Metal Center ◽  
Complex Nature ◽  
Dynamic Simulations ◽  
Subtle Change ◽  
Cobalt Protoporphyrin

Nuclear receptor REV-ERBβ is an overexpressed oncoprotein that has been used as a target for cancer treatment. The metal-complex nature of its ligand, iron protoporphyrin IX (Heme), enables the REV-ERBβ to be used for multiple therapeutic modalities as a photonuclease, a photosensitizer, or a fluorescence imaging agent. The replacement of iron with cobalt as the metal center of protoporphyrin IX changes the ligand from an agonist to an antagonist of REV-ERBβ. The mechanism behind that phenomenon is still unclear, despite the availability of crystal structures of REV-ERBβ in complex with Heme and cobalt protoporphyrin IX (CoPP). This study used molecular dynamic simulations to compare the effects of REV-ERBβ binding to Heme and CoPP, respectively. The initial poses of Heme and CoPP in complex with agonist and antagonist forms of REV-ERBβ were predicted using molecular docking. The binding energies of each ligand were calculated using the MM/PBSA method. The computed binding affinity of Heme to REV-ERBβ was stronger than that of CoPP, in agreement with experimental results. CoPP altered the conformation of the ligand-binding site of REV-ERBβ, disrupting the binding site for nuclear receptor corepressor, which is required for REV-ERBβ to regulate the transcription of downstream target genes. Those results suggest that a subtle change in the metal center of porphyrin can change the behavior of porphyrin in cancer cell signaling. Therefore, modification of porphyrin-based agents for cancer therapy should be conducted carefully to avoid triggering unfavorable effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document