Louisiana's Next Step in Juvenile Justice Reform: Implementing the Crossover Youth Practice Model

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittany LaCombe
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Practice Model ◽  
Crossover Youth

Crossover Youth

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Haight ◽  
Min Hae Cho
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Developmental Trajectories ◽  
Developmental Outcomes ◽  
Crossing Over ◽  
Practice Model ◽  
Crossover Youth ◽  
Effective Interventions ◽  
Growing Body ◽  
Protective Processes ◽  
Insight Into

“Crossover youth” are maltreated youth who have engaged in delinquency. They are of particular concern to child welfare, juvenile justice, and other professionals because of their risks for problematic developmental outcomes. Effective interventions that promote more positive developmental trajectories require an understanding of the various pathways from maltreatment to delinquency. A growing body of research identifies potential risk and protective processes for maltreated youth crossing over into delinquency at ecological levels ranging from the micro to the macro. Most scholarship, however, is not developmental and provides little insight into how children’s emerging capacities relate to their abilities to actively respond to risk or protective processes. Solutions to crossing over are likely to be found in interventions that simultaneously address risk and protective processes across multiple ecological levels and across development. Emerging research suggests that the Crossover Youth Practice Model is one such promising intervention for improving outcomes for maltreated youth.

Implementing the Crossover Youth Practice Model in diverse contexts: Child welfare and juvenile justice professionals' experiences of multisystem collaborations

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 91-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy L. Haight ◽  
Laurel N. Bidwell ◽  
Jane Marie Marshall ◽  
Parmananda Khatiwoda
Keyword(s):  
Child Welfare ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Practice Model ◽  
Crossover Youth

Responding to Crossover Youth: A Look Beyond Recidivism Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 381-394
Author(s):  
Emily M. Wright ◽  
Ryan Spohn ◽  
Michael Campagna
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Positive Outcomes ◽  
Practice Model ◽  
Crossover Youth ◽  
Case Closure ◽  
Outcome Evaluations ◽  
Case Dispositions ◽  
Inform Decision Making

Crossover youth are involved in both child welfare and juvenile justice systems. The Crossover Youth Practice Model (CYPM) promotes collaboration between these systems to inform decision making between the two agencies and better serve these youth. Yet, few outcome evaluations of the CYPM exist, especially those that assess outcomes beyond recidivism, such as case dispositions, case closure, or placement or living situations. This study examined whether the CYPM ( n = 210) decreased recidivism and increased system/case responses and positive outcomes among youth within 9–18 months after the youth’s initial arrest relative to a comparison group of crossover youth ( n = 425) who were arrested 1 year before the CYPM was implemented. Overall, the findings suggest that the CYPM in the jurisdiction under study dismisses or diverts crossover youth more often, closes delinquency cases more often, and leads to more home placements than was previously done in the jurisdiction, but it does not significantly reduce recidivism.

An evaluation of the Crossover Youth Practice Model (CYPM): Recidivism outcomes for maltreated youth involved in the juvenile justice system

2016 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 78-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Haight ◽  
Laurel Bidwell ◽  
Won Seok Choi ◽  
Minhae Cho
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Practice Model ◽  
Crossover Youth

Crossover youth and gender: What are the challenges of girls involved in both the foster care and juvenile justice systems?

2018 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 149-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry Flores ◽  
Janelle Hawes ◽  
Angela Westbrooks ◽  
Chanae Henderson
Keyword(s):  
Foster Care ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Crossover Youth ◽  
Justice Systems ◽  
And Gender

Social Justice for Crossover Youth: The Intersection of the Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice Systems

Social Work ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 313-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen M. Kolivoski ◽  
Sara Goodkind ◽  
Jeffrey J. Shook
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Child Welfare ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Crossover Youth ◽  
Justice Systems

Juvenile Justice and Crossover Youth in Child Welfare

2018 ◽  
pp. 339-362
Author(s):  
Peter J. Pecora ◽  
James K. Whittaker ◽  
Richard P. Barth ◽  
Sharon Borja ◽  
William Vesneski
Keyword(s):  
Child Welfare ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Crossover Youth

CHALLENGES FACING CROSSOVER YOUTH: AN EXAMINATION OF JUVENILE-JUSTICE DECISION MAKING AND RECIDIVISM

2010 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 305-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise C. Herz ◽  
Joseph P. Ryan ◽  
Shay Bilchik
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Crossover Youth
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document