Adaptive Learning in Finitely Repeated Games

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoki Funai
Top ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-95
Author(s):  
Ignacio García-Jurado ◽  
Natividad Llorca ◽  
Ana Meca ◽  
Manuel A. Pulido ◽  
Joaquín Sánchez-Soriano

Games ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Lina Andersson

This paper uses the framework of stochastic games to propose a model of emotions in repeated interactions. An emotional player can be in either a friendly, a neutral, or a hostile state of mind. The player transitions between the states of mind as a response to observed actions taken by the other player. The state of mind determines the player’s psychological payoff which together with a material payoff constitutes the player’s utility. In the friendly (hostile) state of mind the player has a positive (negative) concern for other players’ material payoffs. This paper shows how emotions can both facilitate and obstruct cooperation in a repeated prisoners’ dilemma game. In finitely repeated games a player who cares only for their own material payoffs can have an incentive to manipulate an emotional player into the friendly state of mind. In infinitely repeated games with two emotional players less patience is required to sustain cooperation. However, emotions can also obstruct cooperation if they make the players unwilling to punish each other, or if the players become hostile when punished.


Author(s):  
George J. Mailath ◽  
Steven A. Matthews ◽  
Tadashi Sekiguchi

We present three examples of finitely repeated games with public monitoring that have sequential equilibria in private strategies, i.e., strategies that depend on own past actions as well as public signals. Such private sequential equilibria can have features quite unlike those of the more familiar perfect public equilibria: (i) making a public signal less informative can create Pareto superior equilibrium outcomes; (ii) the equilibrium final-period action profile need not be a stage game equilibrium; and (iii) even if the stage game has a unique correlated (and hence Nash) equilibrium, the first-period action profile need not be a stage game equilibrium.


1987 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. -P. Benoit ◽  
V. Krishna

Econometrica ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Benoit ◽  
Vijay Krishna

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Weinstein ◽  
Muhamet Yildiz

2000 ◽  
Vol 02 (02n03) ◽  
pp. 129-139
Author(s):  
IGNACIO GARCÍA-JURADO ◽  
LUCIANO MÉNDEZ-NAYA ◽  
FIORAVANTE PATRONE

Econometrica ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Benoit ◽  
Vijay Krishna

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document