Achieving Clinical Automation in Emergency Medicine with Machine Learning Medical Directives

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devin Singh ◽  
Sujay Nagaraj ◽  
Pouria Mashouri ◽  
Erik Drysdale ◽  
Jason Fischer ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Ratchana Rajendran ◽  
Bhagyalaxmi Singirikonda ◽  
Navpreet ◽  
Neetu Jain ◽  
Mohd Naved ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 870-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathon Stewart ◽  
Peter Sprivulis ◽  
Girish Dwivedi

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangil Lee ◽  
Samuel H Lam ◽  
Thiago Augusto Hernandes Rocha ◽  
Ross J Fleischman ◽  
Catherine A Staton ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie Walker ◽  
Jirayus Jiarpakdee ◽  
Anne Loupis ◽  
Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn ◽  
Keith Joe ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectivePatients, families and community members would like emergency department wait time visibility. This would improve patient journeys through emergency medicine. The study objective was to derive, internally and externally validate machine learning models to predict emergency patient wait times that are applicable to a wide variety of emergency departments.MethodsTwelve emergency departments provided three years of retrospective administrative data from Australia (2017-19). Descriptive and exploratory analyses were undertaken on the datasets. Statistical and machine learning models were developed to predict wait times at each site and were internally and externally validated. Model performance was tested on COVID-19 period data (January to June 2020).ResultsThere were 1,930,609 patient episodes analysed and median site wait times varied from 24 to 54 minutes. Individual site model prediction median absolute errors varied from +/−22.6 minutes (95%CI 22.4,22.9) to +/− 44.0 minutes (95%CI 43.4,44.4). Global model prediction median absolute errors varied from +/−33.9 minutes (95%CI 33.4, 34.0) to +/−43.8 minutes (95%CI 43.7, 43.9). Random forest and linear regression models performed the best, rolling average models under-estimated wait times. Important variables were triage category, last-k patient average wait time, and arrival time. Wait time prediction models are not transferable across hospitals. Models performed well during the COVID-19 lockdown period.ConclusionsElectronic emergency demographic and flow information can be used to approximate emergency patient wait times. A general model is less accurate if applied without site specific factors.What is already known on this subject⍰Patients and families want to know approximate emergency wait times, which will improve their ability to manage their logistical, physical and emotional needs whilst waiting⍰There are a few small studies from a limited number of jurisdictions, reporting model methods, important predictor variables and accuracy of derived modelsWhat this study adds⍰Our study demonstrates that predicting wait times from simple, readily available data is complex and provides estimates that aren’t as accurate as patients would like, however rough estimates may still be better than no information⍰We present the most influential variables regarding wait times and advise against using rolling average models, preferring random forest or linear regression techniques⍰Emergency medicine machine learning models may be less generalisable to other sites than we hope for when we read manuscripts or buy commercial off-the-shelf models or algorithms. Models developed for one site lose accuracy at another site and global models built for whole systems may need customisation to each individual site. This may apply to data science clinical decision instruments as well as operational machine learning models.


Author(s):  
Kenneth Jian Wei Tang ◽  
Candice Ke En Ang ◽  
Constantinides Theodoros ◽  
V. Rajinikanth ◽  
U. Rajendra Acharya ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. emermed-2020-211000
Author(s):  
Katie Walker ◽  
Jirayus Jiarpakdee ◽  
Anne Loupis ◽  
Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn ◽  
Keith Joe ◽  
...  

ObjectivePatients, families and community members would like emergency department wait time visibility. This would improve patient journeys through emergency medicine. The study objective was to derive, internally and externally validate machine learning models to predict emergency patient wait times that are applicable to a wide variety of emergency departments.MethodsTwelve emergency departments provided 3 years of retrospective administrative data from Australia (2017–2019). Descriptive and exploratory analyses were undertaken on the datasets. Statistical and machine learning models were developed to predict wait times at each site and were internally and externally validated. Model performance was tested on COVID-19 period data (January to June 2020).ResultsThere were 1 930 609 patient episodes analysed and median site wait times varied from 24 to 54 min. Individual site model prediction median absolute errors varied from±22.6 min (95% CI 22.4 to 22.9) to ±44.0 min (95% CI 43.4 to 44.4). Global model prediction median absolute errors varied from ±33.9 min (95% CI 33.4 to 34.0) to ±43.8 min (95% CI 43.7 to 43.9). Random forest and linear regression models performed the best, rolling average models underestimated wait times. Important variables were triage category, last-k patient average wait time and arrival time. Wait time prediction models are not transferable across hospitals. Models performed well during the COVID-19 lockdown period.ConclusionsElectronic emergency demographic and flow information can be used to approximate emergency patient wait times. A general model is less accurate if applied without site-specific factors.


2021 ◽  
pp. 275-286
Author(s):  
Ahmad A. Aalam ◽  
Sam P. Tarassoli ◽  
Damien J. Drury ◽  
Elias G. Carayannis ◽  
Andrew C. Meltzer

To provide acute unscheduled care 24 hours per day and 7 days per week is the core mission of emergency medicine. Emergency telehealth is evolving in scope and complexity, no longer constraining care by the walls of the emergency department (ED). Current audio- and video-based communications will advance to support a complex interplay between enhanced video communication, remote patient monitoring, augmented reality, and machine learning. Many of these technologies already exist or are under development for near-term implementation. For those deploying or planning the deployment of emergency telehealth services, this chapter highlights near-term technologies and applications to be considered.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangil Lee ◽  
Nicholas Mohr ◽  
Nicholas Street ◽  
Prakash Nadkarni

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document