Transformation as Borderline-Case of Long-Run Development: Aspects of a Classical-Evolutionary Theory of Institutional Transformation

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph Michael Wrobel

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamaluddin

The writings are inspired by Purwo Santoso's paper "Making a Proprietorship of Indonesia in Regional Synergy" where there are many criticisms and questions to the designers who are architects of our Indonesian culture? By using several assumptions from colleagues such as Corneles Lay and Pratikno who explicitly explained that like the regional structuring process, it could not be understood merely as a technocratic process, regional arrangement gave consequences and political battles, including the fight in determining goals or directions. Therefore, it makes perfect sense for Pratikno's proposition, that in the long run decentralization is not necessarily the final choice, because the objectives of regional arrangement cannot be unilaterally determined. Whoever is the culprit, and whatever will be realized, the regional structuring process can be understood and studied as an institutional transformation process that occurs in a certain time and space.



KÜLÖNBSÉG ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dániel Bárdos

It is a basic question of evolutionary theory what sort of connections there are between microevolutionary and macroevolutionary processes, i. e. between changes below the level of species in the present and changes above the level of a given species in the long run. The paper argues that this question about the structure of evolutionary theory cannot be answered just by comparing arguments by modern synthesis theory on the one hand and those of paleobiology on the other. Modern synthesis theory remains sceptical of the use of microevolutionary mechanisms, while paleobiology maintains their importance. The paper claim that the question can only be answered within the context of the history of science that has been shaping it since the publication of Darwin’s The Origin of Species. So the question about the use of microevolutionary mechanisms should be considered to be a struggle about the scope of evolutionary science and its methodologies rather than a scientific question about the reducibility of macroevolution.



2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard D. Arvey ◽  
Stephen M. Colarelli ◽  
John Kello








2005 ◽  
pp. 133-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Balashova

The method of analyzing and modeling cyclical fluctuations of economy initiated by F. Kydland and E. Prescott - the 2004 Nobel Prize winners in Economics - is considered in the article. They proposed a new business cycle theory integrating the theory of long-run economic growth as well as the microeconomic theory of consumers and firms behavior. Simple version of general dynamic and stochastic macroeconomic model is described. The given approach which was formulated in their fundamental work "Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations" (1982) gave rise to an extensive research program and is still used as a basic instrument for investigating cyclical processes in economy nowadays.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document