The Long-Run Accuracy of Heuristics: Covariation Assessment, Bayesian Inference, and Hypothesis Testing

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig R. M. McKenzie
Author(s):  
Patrick W. Kraft ◽  
Ellen M. Key ◽  
Matthew J. Lebo

Abstract Grant and Lebo (2016) and Keele et al. (2016) clarify the conditions under which the popular general error correction model (GECM) can be used and interpreted easily: In a bivariate GECM the data must be integrated in order to rely on the error correction coefficient, $\alpha _1^\ast$ , to test cointegration and measure the rate of error correction between a single exogenous x and a dependent variable, y. Here we demonstrate that even if the data are all integrated, the test on $\alpha _1^\ast$ is misunderstood when there is more than a single independent variable. The null hypothesis is that there is no cointegration between y and any x but the correct alternative hypothesis is that y is cointegrated with at least one—but not necessarily more than one—of the x's. A significant $\alpha _1^\ast$ can occur when some I(1) regressors are not cointegrated and the equation is not balanced. Thus, the correct limiting distributions of the right-hand-side long-run coefficients may be unknown. We use simulations to demonstrate the problem and then discuss implications for applied examples.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Etz ◽  
Julia M. Haaf ◽  
Jeffrey N. Rouder ◽  
Joachim Vandekerckhove

Hypothesis testing is a special form of model selection. Once a pair of competing models is fully defined, their definition immediately leads to a measure of how strongly each model supports the data. The ratio of their support is often called the likelihood ratio or the Bayes factor. Critical in the model-selection endeavor is the specification of the models. In the case of hypothesis testing, it is of the greatest importance that the researcher specify exactly what is meant by a “null” hypothesis as well as the alternative to which it is contrasted, and that these are suitable instantiations of theoretical positions. Here, we provide an overview of different instantiations of null and alternative hypotheses that can be useful in practice, but in all cases the inferential procedure is based on the same underlying method of likelihood comparison. An associated app can be found at https://osf.io/mvp53/ . This article is the work of the authors and is reformatted from the original, which was published under a CC-By Attribution 4.0 International license and is available at https://psyarxiv.com/wmf3r/ .


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
NISIT PANTHAMIT ◽  
CHUKIAT CHAIBOONSRI

This research paper aims to investigate linkages of electricity consumption representing energy security with estimated factors — GDP, population and foreign direct investment (FDI) during 1998–2018 for Laos People Democratic Republic (Lao PDR) by using ARDLbased Bayesian inference. This study provided empirical evidence on a long-run linear relationship analysis under ARDL-based Bayesian inference, which concludes that they have performed real relationships between electricity consumption, GDP, population and FDI. In addition, in the short-run, it was found that explanatory factors have both negative and positive impacts on Laos’ electricity consumption. The results confirm the hypothesis that although Lao PDR has access to domestic energy resources, only relying on one energy resource will make the energy system insecure. Thus, Lao PDR must develop substantial infrastructures and alternative renewable energies to support the campaign of Lao PDRs electricity security in the long-run.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo CAMPITELLI

This tutorial on Bayesian inference targets psychological researchers who are trained in the null hypothesis testing approach and use of SPSS software. There a number ofexcellent quality tutorials on Bayesian inference, but their problem is that, they assume mathematical knowledge that most psychological researchers do not possess. Thistutorial starts from the idea that Bayesian inference is not more difficult than the traditional approach, but before being introduced to probability theory notation is necessary for the newcomer to understand simple probability principles, which could be explained without mathematical formulas or probability notation. For this purpose in this tutorial I use a simple tool-the parameter-data table-to explain how probability theory can easily be used to make inferences in research. Then I compare the Bayesian and the null hypothesis testing approach using the same tool. Only after having introduced these principles I show the formulas and notations and explain how they relate to the parameter-data table. It is to be expected that this tutorial will increase the use of Bayesian inference by psychological researchers. Moreover, Bayesian researchers may use this tutorial to teach Bayesian inference to undergraduate or postgraduate students.


1994 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 412-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Western ◽  
Simon Jackman

Regression analysis in comparative research suffers from two distinct problems of statistical inference. First, because the data constitute all the available observations from a population, conventional inference based on the long-run behavior of a repeatable data mechanism is not appropriate. Second, the small and collinear data sets of comparative research yield imprecise estimates of the effects of explanatory variables. We describe a Bayesian approach to statistical inference that provides a unified solution to these two problems. This approach is illustrated in a comparative analysis of unionization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document