Does Institutional Investor Influence on Executive Compensation Increase Firm Value?

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gavin Smith ◽  
Peter L. Swan ◽  
David R. Gallagher



2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 1371-1401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Praveen Kumar ◽  
K. Sivaramakrishnan


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1084r) ◽  
pp. 1-56
Author(s):  
Ricardo Correa ◽  
◽  
Ugur Lel




2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 14-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Carrothers

This paper examines the relationship between hedge fund activism and target firm performance, executive compensation, and executive wealth. It introduces a theoretical framework that describes the activism process as a sequence of discrete decisions. The methodology uses regression analysis on a matched sample based on firm size, industry, and market-to-book ratio. All regressions control for industry and year fixed effects. Schedule 13D Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings are the source for the statistical sample of hedge fund target firms. I supplement that data with target firm financial, operating, and share price information from the CRSP-COMPUSTAT merged database. Activist hedge funds target undervalued or underperforming firms with high profitability and cash flows. They do not avoid firms with powerful CEOs. Leverage, executive compensation, pay for performance and CEO turnover increase at target firms after the arrival of the activist hedge fund. Target firm executives’ wealth is more sensitive to changes in share price after hedge fund activism events suggesting that the executive team experiences changes to their compensation structure that provides incentive to take action to improve returns to shareholders. The top executives reap rewards for increasing firm value but not for increased risk taking.



Author(s):  
Menachem (Meni) Abudy ◽  
Dan Amiram ◽  
Oded Rozenbaum ◽  
Efrat Shust


2015 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 64-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huimin Chung ◽  
William Q. Judge ◽  
Yi-Hua Li




Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document