scholarly journals A Minimally Invasive Technique Using Cortical Bone Trajectory Screws Assisted by 3D-Printed Navigation Templates in Lumbar Adjacent Segment Degeneration

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 16 ◽  
pp. 1403-1413
Author(s):  
Kun He ◽  
Chunke Dong ◽  
Hongyu Wei ◽  
Feng Yang ◽  
Haoning Ma ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun He ◽  
Chunke Dong ◽  
Hongyu Wei ◽  
Feng Yang ◽  
Haoning Ma ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Revision surgery of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) commonly need to expose and remove the original fixation. In order to minimize the trauma, reduce the operation time and blood loss, we introduce a minimally invasive lumbar revision technique using cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws assisted by three-dimensional(3D) printed navigation templates.Methods: From April 2017 to October 2019, 18 patients with ASD underwent revision surgery with CBT screws assisted by 3D-printed templates in our hospital. All the operation data, including operation time, blood loss, incision length were recorded. We evaluated the clinical efficacy using the visual analogue scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. X-ray and Computed Tomography (CT) scans were used to evaluate the stability of CBT screws fixation, the accuracy of screws, and the fusion rate.Results: The mean follow-up was 22.4±4.7 months (12-31m), the VAS, ODI, and JOA score were analyzed by SPSS 21.0 and showed significant improvement at 2-weeks and the last follow-up compared with preoperative data(P<0.05). 76 CBT screws were inserted with navigation templates, 2 screws were Grade B, other screws were all Grade 0 or A. Changes of intervertebral height showed good stability of CBT screws fixation(P>0.05). All the patients had satisfactory fusion results.Conclusion: Revision surgery of ASD with CBT screws assisted by 3D-printed navigation templates has satisfactory clinical efficacy with advantages of the short operation time, small incision, and less blood loss.


Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (28) ◽  
pp. e26666
Author(s):  
Long Wang ◽  
Yong-Hui Zhao ◽  
Xing-Bo Cai ◽  
Jin-Long Liang ◽  
Hao-Tian Luo ◽  
...  

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyungduk Rho ◽  
Timothy E OConnor ◽  
Jean-Marc Lucas ◽  
John Pollina ◽  
Jeffrey Mullin

2021 ◽  
pp. 155335062098822
Author(s):  
Eirini Giovannopoulou ◽  
Anastasia Prodromidou ◽  
Nikolaos Blontzos ◽  
Christos Iavazzo

Objective. To review the existing studies on single-site robotic myomectomy and test the safety and feasibility of this innovative minimally invasive technique. Data Sources. PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar (from their inception to October 2019), as well as Clinicaltrials.gov databases up to April 2020. Methods of Study Selection. Clinical trials (prospective or retrospective) that reported the outcomes of single-site robotic myomectomy, with a sample of at least 20 patients were considered eligible for the review. Results. The present review was performed in accordance with the guidelines for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Four (4) studies met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 267 patients were included with a mean age from 37.1 to 39.1 years and BMI from 21.6 to 29.4 kg/m2. The mean operative time ranged from 131.4 to 154.2 min, the mean docking time from 5.1 to 5.45 min, and the mean blood loss from 57.9 to 182.62 ml. No intraoperative complications were observed, and a conversion rate of 3.8% was reported by a sole study. The overall postoperative complication rate was estimated at 2.2%, and the mean hospital stay ranged from 0.57 to 4.7 days. No significant differences were detected when single-site robotic myomectomy was compared to the multiport technique concerning operative time, blood loss, and total complication rate. Conclusion. Our findings support the safety of single-site robotic myomectomy and its equivalency with the multiport technique on the most studied outcomes. Further studies are needed to conclude on the optimal minimally invasive technique for myomectomy.


1991 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEPHENIE R. LONG ◽  
RALPH V. CLAYMAN ◽  
STEPHEN M. DIERKS ◽  
SHIMON MERETYK ◽  
TERRY BUELNA

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document