scholarly journals Prognostic Value of Sarcopenia and Systemic Inflammation Markers in Patients Undergoing Definitive Radiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 181-192
Author(s):  
Huanwei Liang ◽  
Huajian Peng ◽  
Long Chen
2020 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S798
Author(s):  
U. Aydos ◽  
O. Sutcuoglu ◽  
U.O. Akdemir ◽  
O. Yazıcı ◽  
L.O. Atay

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Chang ◽  
Wei Deng ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
Zongmei Zhou ◽  
Jun Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To investigate the interobserver variability (IOV) in target volume delineation of definitive radiotherapy for thoracic esophageal cancer (TEC) among cancer centers in China, and ultimately improve contouring consistency as much as possible to lay the foundation for multi-center prospective studies. Methods Sixteen cancer centers throughout China participated in this study. In Phase 1, three suitable cases with upper, middle, and lower TEC were chosen, and participants were asked to contour a group of gross tumor volume (GTV-T), nodal gross tumor volume (GTV-N) and clinical target volume (CTV) for each case based on their routine experience. In Phase 2, the same clinicians were instructed to follow a contouring protocol to re-contour another group of target volume. The variation of the target volume was analyzed and quantified using dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Results Sixteen clinicians provided routine volumes, whereas ten provided both routine and protocol volumes for each case. The IOV of routine GTV-N was the most striking in all cases, with the smallest DSC of 0.37 (95% CI 0.32–0.42), followed by CTV, whereas GTV-T showed high consistency. After following the protocol, the smallest DSC of GTV-N was improved to 0.64 (95% CI 0.45–0.83, P = 0.005) but the DSC of GTV-T and CTV remained constant in most cases. Conclusion Variability in target volume delineation was observed, but it could be significantly reduced and controlled using mandatory interventions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 3288-3299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuke Ishibashi ◽  
Hironori Tsujimoto ◽  
Shuichi Hiraki ◽  
Isao Kumano ◽  
Yoshihisa Yaguchi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wentao Zhou ◽  
Tiantao Kuang ◽  
Xu Han ◽  
Wenqi Chen ◽  
Xuefeng Xu ◽  
...  

Objectives Systemic inflammation markers have been demonstrated to be associated with prognosis in various tumors. In this study, we aimed to assess the value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic immune-inflammation index and the counts of lymphocyte, monocyte and neutrophil in predicting prognosis among patients with resected pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs). Methods A total of 174 patients were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the predictive roles of inflammation markers for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in pNEN patients. Results The optimal cut-off values of NLR, LMR and lymphocyte count were 1.9, 5.0 and 1.4 × 109/L, respectively, determined by the X-tile software. RFS was found to be significantly longer in patients with NLR ≤1.9 (P = 0.041), LMR >5.0 (P < 0.001) and lymphocyte count >1.4 × 109/L (P = 0.002) in comparison to those with NLR >1.9, LMR ≤5.0 and lymphocyte count ≤1.4 × 109/L, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that LMR (hazard ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.11–0.85, P = 0.023) was an independent predictor for RFS, but not NLR or lymphocyte count. For long-term survival analysis, patients with NLR ≤1.9 (P = 0.016) were found to be associated with favorable OS, but NLR was not an independent factor validated by multivariate analysis. Conclusions Preoperative LMR is an independent systemic inflammation marker to predict relapses in pNEN patients who underwent curative resections, whose clinical value needs to be verified in further large sample-based prospective studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document