scholarly journals Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Open Partial Nephrectomy for Different Complexity Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 7455-7461
Author(s):  
Yang Yu ◽  
Wenfeng Wang ◽  
Zuquan Xiong ◽  
Zhenyu Yang ◽  
Jun Li ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Mu ◽  
Kehang Chen ◽  
Jun He ◽  
Peng Chen ◽  
Miao Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To evaluate the application of R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score (RNS) in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) with zero ischemia and sutureless surgery, and to explore the efficacy and safety of zero ischemia and seamless LPN in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma.Methods: The clinical data of 67 patients with renal cell carcinoma treated by LPN in the affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University from January 2016 to July 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into renal artery occlusion group (n=31) and non-occlusion group (n=36). All cases were divided according to their RNS (low, moderate, and high), and the perioperative condition, postoperative complications, postoperative recovery and changes of renal function in the two groups were analyzed.Results: According to the RNS, all cases were classified in low-complex. Both groups successfully completed the operation without operative complications. Compared with the renal artery occlusion group, the non-occlusion group had a shorter operation time (35.51±20.48 min), shorter hospital stay (6.72±4.39 d), and no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss(50.39±30.19 ml). During the 6-month follow-up, the creatinine value of the renal function in the non-occlusion group (78.47±10.98μmol/L) was lower than that in the occlusion group(98.21±8.06μmol/L).Conclusion: Zero-ischemia sutureless LPN technique can effectively reduce the time of ischemia and avoid renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. This surgical technique may be a feasible surgical method for the treatment of low RNS renal cell carcinoma.


2007 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 219-219
Author(s):  
Sashi S. Kommu ◽  
Faiz H. Mumtaz ◽  
Abhay Rane ◽  
Rajendra A. Persad ◽  
Christopher G. Eden

2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Shuch ◽  
John S. Lam ◽  
Arie S. Belldegrun

2006 ◽  
Vol 176 (5) ◽  
pp. 1984-1989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sompol Permpongkosol ◽  
Herman S. Bagga ◽  
Frederico R. Romero ◽  
Myrna Sroka ◽  
Thomas W. Jarrett ◽  
...  

Urology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 140 ◽  
pp. 91-97
Author(s):  
Stefano Luzzago ◽  
Carlotta Palumbo ◽  
Giuseppe Rosiello ◽  
Angela Pecoraro ◽  
Marina Deuker ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin N. Bay ◽  
Peter Black

The occurrence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and urothelial carcinoma (UC) synchronously in the same kidney is exceedingly rare. All reported cases have been managed with either nephroureterectomy or nephrectomy. We report on a patient who required renal-sparing management of his double malignancy, including open partial nephrectomy of his pT1a RCC and endoscopic laser ablation of his low-grade Ta renal pelvis UC. After 4 years, the patient is in good health and disease-free under strict surveillance. It, therefore, would appear justified to combine partial nephrectomy for RCC and endoscopic management of UC in the same kidney of an appropriately selected patient.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document