Laparoscopic Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Pathological T 1 N 0 M 0 Renal Cell Carcinoma: A 5-Year Survival Rate

2006 ◽  
Vol 176 (5) ◽  
pp. 1984-1989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sompol Permpongkosol ◽  
Herman S. Bagga ◽  
Frederico R. Romero ◽  
Myrna Sroka ◽  
Thomas W. Jarrett ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 219-219
Author(s):  
Sashi S. Kommu ◽  
Faiz H. Mumtaz ◽  
Abhay Rane ◽  
Rajendra A. Persad ◽  
Christopher G. Eden

2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Shuch ◽  
John S. Lam ◽  
Arie S. Belldegrun

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin N. Bay ◽  
Peter Black

The occurrence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and urothelial carcinoma (UC) synchronously in the same kidney is exceedingly rare. All reported cases have been managed with either nephroureterectomy or nephrectomy. We report on a patient who required renal-sparing management of his double malignancy, including open partial nephrectomy of his pT1a RCC and endoscopic laser ablation of his low-grade Ta renal pelvis UC. After 4 years, the patient is in good health and disease-free under strict surveillance. It, therefore, would appear justified to combine partial nephrectomy for RCC and endoscopic management of UC in the same kidney of an appropriately selected patient.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosuke Shibamori ◽  
Kohei Hashimoto ◽  
Tetsuya Shindo ◽  
Hidetoshi Tabata ◽  
Yuki Kyoda ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Yu ◽  
Qian Xu ◽  
Xian-Gen Liu

Objective: To analyze the impact of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) on outcomes of complex clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).Methods: A total of 132 high-complex ccRCC patients with a Radius Exophytic Nearness Anterior Location (R.E.N.A.L) score ≥7 enrolled in our hospital between January 2018 and June 2020 were matched and assigned to an LPN group (given LPN treatment) and an OPN group (given OPN treatment), with 66 cases in each group. Two weeks and 3 months after the operation, the renal indexes, inflammatory factors, basic perioperative conditions, and incidence of complications were compared.Results: Two weeks after the operation, the levels of SCr and CysC were elevated, with higher levels observed in the LPN group (all P < 0.05), and the eGFR levels were reduced, with a lower result in the LPN group. Three months after the operation, the two groups observed decreased levels of SCr and CysC, and an increased level of eGFR; moreover, the decreased SCr and CysC levels were still higher, and the increased eGFR was lower than those before the operation (P < 0.05). The levels of CRP and TNF-α in the two groups increased after the operation, with a lower outcome in the LPN group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the LPN group had less intraoperative blood loss and shorter postoperative length of hospital stay but longer blocking time compared to the OPN group (P < 0.05). Patients in the LPN group were recorded with a lower complication incidence compared with the OPN group (3.03 vs. 15.15%, P < 0.05).Conclusion: Both LPN and OPN enjoy significant efficacy in the treatment of complex ccRCC and effectively protect renal function. Moreover, LPN is a more acceptable option for complex ccRCC due to its numerous benefits in postoperative stress response, complications, recovery. which is worthy of promotion with safety and feasibility.


2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-49
Author(s):  
Qamar Zia ◽  
Mudassar Sajjad ◽  
Muhammad Akmal ◽  
Faran Kiyani ◽  
Muhammad Nawaz ◽  
...  

Objective: To assess the safety and oncological outcomes of Open Partial Nephrectomy in management of small renal tumours. Study Design: Case series. Place and Duration of Study: Armed Forces Institute of Urology, Rawalpindi, from Jan 2015 to Dec 2018. Methodology: We prospectively studied 61 patients with renal tumours either observed on computerized tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) having size ≤7cm and underwent open partial nephrectomy. The collected data included demographics, dimension of tumour, indication for surgery, cold ischemia time, hospital stay, complications and histopathological finding including involvement of margins. Patients were followed up for atleast 2 years. Results: Among 61, 39 patients were male and 22 females. The age of patients ranged from 20-72 years. Mean cold ischaemia time was 24.7 ± 6.37 minutes. Except for 2 patients with Von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) disease, all other patients had solitary renal growth. Nine (14.75%) patients had solitary kidney. The mean of maximum dimension of tumours was 3.84 ± 1.38 cm and mean hospital stay was 3.18 ± 2.19 days. Histopathological results showed 34 tumours to be conventional renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (55.73%) followed by 12 papillary renal cell carcinoma (19.67%). Two (3.27%) patients had positive surgical margin who were operated for >5 cm tumours and later managed expectantly. Twenty one patients had Grade I and II complications while 2 patients were stented post operatively for urine leak. At 2 years follow up there was no recurrence of tumour in any of the patient operated. Conclusion: Open ..........


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document