scholarly journals Effect of a dentifrice containing different particle sizes of hydroxyapatite on dentin tubule occlusion and aqueous Cr (VI) sorption

2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 5243-5256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peiyan Yuan ◽  
Shuying Liu ◽  
Yingtao Lv ◽  
Weilong Liu ◽  
Weiqun Ma ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 662-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleftherios-Terry R. Farmakis ◽  
Konstantinos Kozyrakis ◽  
Marouan G. Khabbaz ◽  
Ulrich Schoop ◽  
Franziska Beer ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 293-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuejun Liu ◽  
Virginia Barnes ◽  
William DeVizio ◽  
Hong Yang ◽  
Hans Malmstrom ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 276-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiki Takamizawa ◽  
Akimasa Tsujimoto ◽  
Ryo Ishii ◽  
Maho Ujiie ◽  
Mami Kawazu ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 775-783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qin Wang ◽  
Yang Kang ◽  
Virginia Barnes ◽  
William DeVizio ◽  
Ajay Kashi ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiyuki Suge ◽  
Akiko Kawasaki ◽  
Kunio Ishikawa ◽  
Takashi Matsuo ◽  
Shigeyuki Ebisu

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela D. Canali ◽  
Rodrigo N. Rached ◽  
Rui F. Mazur ◽  
Evelise M. Souza

The aim of the study was to evaluate dentinal tubule occlusion, measuring the dentin permeability (Lp) and using different desensitizing agents before and after abrasive/erosive challenge. Dentin discs from 42 healthy human third molars were obtained. Minimum Lp was measured after a smear layer simulation using #600 SiC paper and maximum Lp after an immersion in 0.5 M EDTA. The specimens were treated with different desensitizers: two varnishes (Clinpro XT Varnish-CV, Fluor Protector-FP), a paste (Desensibilize Nano P-NP) and a gel (Oxa Gel-OG). The Lp of each specimen was measured immediately after the desensitizers’ application. The discs were subjected to erosion/abrasion cycles for 7 days, with 0.5% citric acid solution (6x/day) and tooth brushing (3x/day). Lp was measured after the first, fourth and seventh day of the challenge. The data were analyzed by 3-way ANOVA with repeated measurements and by a Games-Howell test (α=5%). FP and CV did not show significant differences in Lp immediately after application until the 7th day (p<0.05). OG showed a significant increase in Lp after the 4th and 7th days. NP resulted in a significantly higher permeability compared to the other materials immediately after the application and after the 1st day of challenge. All the desensitizers reduced the dentin permeability immediately after application. However, only the varnishes were able to maintain the occlusive effect after the erosion/abrasion challenge.


2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
SA Garofalo ◽  
LO Sakae ◽  
AC Machado ◽  
SR Cunha ◽  
DM Zezell ◽  
...  

SUMMARY Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of four in-office desensitizing products on dentin tubule occlusion and erosive wear. Methods: Dentin hypersensitivity was simulated by EDTA application for five minutes. The specimens were randomly allocated into five groups (n=11), according to treatment: No treatment - Control (C), Duraphat (DUR), Desensibilize Nano P (NP), ClinPro XT Varnish (XTV), and ClinPro White Varnish (CWV). They were then submitted to erosive/abrasive cycling for five days. After EDTA, treatment, and cycling, the specimens were analyzed with an environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM) to verify the number of opened dentin tubules (ODT) which were counted by using ImageJ software, and with a profilometer to determine the surface curvature/loss. ESEM data were analyzed with two-way repeated measure analysis of variance and Tukey tests. For the profilometer, data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis, Tukey, and Mann-Whitney tests. Results: After treatment, all groups showed lower ODT than the control, without significant differences between them. After cycling, the only group that showed lower ODT than the control was group XTV; however, it did not significantly differ from the other groups. For the profilometric analysis, there were significant differences in SL between the experimental times after treatment and after cycling for all groups (p&lt;0.05). After cycling, no surface loss was detected in groups DUR and XTV, which presented a significantly different curvature than group NP and the control group, but not from group CWV. Surface loss was detected for the control and groups NP and CWV, without difference among them. Conclusion: All desensitizing agents tested presented promising results concerning the obliteration of dentin tubules immediately after treatment. XTV was the only desensitizer capable of preventing the reopening of the tubules after the erosive/abrasive challenges. XTV and DUR presented a protective effect against dentin erosive wear.


2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bennett T. Amaechi ◽  
Sapna M. Mathews ◽  
Poornima K. Mensinkai

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document