scholarly journals Using a Discrete-Choice Experiment in a Decision Aid to Nudge Patients Towards Value-Concordant Treatment Choices in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Proof-of-Concept Study

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 829-838
Author(s):  
Glen S Hazlewood ◽  
Deborah A Marshall ◽  
Claire EH Barber ◽  
Linda C Li ◽  
Cheryl Barnabe ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. S307
Author(s):  
C. Díaz ◽  
A. Urruticoechea ◽  
J. Ivorra ◽  
S. Díaz Cerezo ◽  
T. Dilla ◽  
...  

Rheumatology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (11) ◽  
pp. 1959-1968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen S. Hazlewood ◽  
Claire Bombardier ◽  
George Tomlinson ◽  
Carter Thorne ◽  
Vivian P. Bykerk ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Martijn Kuijper ◽  
Riëtte Folmer ◽  
Elly A. Stolk ◽  
Johanna M. W. Hazes ◽  
Jolanda J. Luime

Rheumatology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 54 (10) ◽  
pp. 1816-1825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Harrison ◽  
Carlo Marra ◽  
Kam Shojania ◽  
Nick Bansback

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Schölin Bywall ◽  
Ulrik Kihlbom ◽  
Mats Hansson ◽  
Marie Falahee ◽  
Karim Raza ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Preference assessments of patients with rheumatoid arthritis can support clinical therapeutic decisions for including biologic and targeted synthetic medicines to use. This study assesses patient preferences for attributes of second-line therapies and heterogeneity within these preferences to estimate the relative importance of treatment characteristics and to calculate the minimum benefit levels patients require to accept higher levels of side effects.Methods: Between November 2018 to August 2019, patients with rheumatoid arthritis were recruited to a survey containing demographic and disease-related questions as well as a discrete choice experiment to measure their preferences for second-line therapies using biologics or Janus kinases inhibitors. Treatment characteristics included were route of administration, frequency of use, probability of mild short-term side effects, probability of side effects changing appearance, probability of psychological side effects, probability of severe side effects, and effectiveness of treatment.Results: A total of 358 patients were included in the analysis. A latent class analysis revealed three preference patterns. 1) Treatment effectiveness as the single most important attribute. 2) Route of administration as the most important attribute, closely followed by frequency of use and psychological side effects. 3) Severe side effects as the most important attribute followed by psychological side effects. In addition, disease duration and mild side effects influenced the patients’ choices.Conclusion: Respondents found either effectiveness, route of administration or severe side effects as the most important attribute. Patients noting effectiveness as most important were more willing than other patients to accept higher risks of side effects.


2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 1479-1495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesar Díaz-Torné ◽  
Ana Urruticoechea-Arana ◽  
José Ivorra-Cortés ◽  
Silvia Díaz ◽  
Tatiana Dilla ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 126-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Hifinger ◽  
M Hiligsmann ◽  
S Ramiro ◽  
V Watson ◽  
J L Severens ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo compare the value that rheumatologists across Europe attach to patients' preferences and economic aspects when choosing treatments for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.MethodsIn a discrete choice experiment, European rheumatologists chose between two hypothetical drug treatments for a patient with moderate disease activity. Treatments differed in five attributes: efficacy (improvement and achieved state on disease activity), safety (probability of serious adverse events), patient's preference (level of agreement), medication costs and cost-effectiveness (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)). A Bayesian efficient design defined 14 choice sets, and a random parameter logit model was used to estimate relative preferences for rheumatologists across countries. Cluster analyses and latent class models were applied to understand preference patterns across countries and among individual rheumatologists.ResultsResponses of 559 rheumatologists from 12 European countries were included in the analysis (49% females, mean age 48 years). In all countries, efficacy dominated treatment decisions followed by economic considerations and patients’ preferences. Across countries, rheumatologists avoided selecting a treatment that patients disliked. Latent class models revealed four respondent profiles: one traded off all attributes except safety, and the remaining three classes disregarded ICER. Among individual rheumatologists, 57% disregarded ICER and these were more likely from Italy, Romania, Portugal or France, whereas 43% disregarded uncommon/rare side effects and were more likely from Belgium, Germany, Hungary, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden or UK.ConclusionsOverall, European rheumatologists are willing to trade between treatment efficacy, patients' treatment preferences and economic considerations. However, the degree of trade-off differs between countries and among individuals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document