scholarly journals The Discouraged Worker Effect and the Added Worker Effect within the Framework of European Debt Crisis

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 522-534
Author(s):  
Armağan Türk ◽  
Rengin Ak
Author(s):  
Viral V. Acharya ◽  
Tim Eisert ◽  
Christian Eufinger ◽  
Christian Hirsch

This chapter compares the recapitalizations of the Japanese banking sector in the 1990s with those in the ongoing European debt crisis. The analysis points to four main policy implications. First, recapitalizing banks by insuring or purchasing troubled assets alone is not likely to solve the problem of banks’ weak capitalization, as this measure is not able to adjust the extent of the recapitalization to the banks’ specific needs. Second, the amount of the recapitalization should be based on actual capital shortages and not risk-weighted assets to avoid banks decreasing their loan supply. Third, banks should face restrictions regarding the amount of dividends they are allowed to pay out. Finally, banks must be induced to clean up their balance sheets and reduce the amount of bad (non-performing) loans to rebuild confidence in the European banking system.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Valerio Filoso ◽  
Carlo Panico ◽  
Erasmo Papagni ◽  
Francesco Purificato ◽  
Marta Vázquez Suárez

Author(s):  
Yu. Kvashnin

Debt crisis in South European region turned out to be the focal point of the European debt crisis. It made explicit fundamental disproportions in the development of the Eurozone, in particular strict division between the Center and the Periphery. After joining to the Eurozone South European countries faced further deterioration of their positions in the global markets and fixing of an unfavorable type of their international specialization. Such situation can be seen most evidently in the case of Greece.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 51-61
Author(s):  
O. S. Kochetovskaya

The main objective of the study was the identification of the key channel of impact of positive and negative external shocks on the Russian banking system for the period from 2000 to 2017. In conducting the study the author used systematic and statistical methods of analysis. Throughout the named period, the banking sector of Russia was always under the influence of one or another external shock: rising and falling oil prices; favorable conditions for obtaining financing on the global capital market; the global financial and economic crisis; the European debt crisis; the tapering of the quantitative easing policy in the USA; sanctions imposed on Russia by the Western countries. In the pre-crisis period, capital inflows became the main channel for the transmission of external shock. In the course of the European debt crisis, problems with attracting external financing became a key channel for the transfer of external shock. During the global crisis and the crisis of 2014–2016 the channels of transmission of external shocks to the banking sector of Russia, despite various causes, were in many ways similar. So, the main channels were the outflow of capital, the restriction of external financing, the collapse of the ruble exchange rate, and the state of confidence in the banking sector.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document