scholarly journals Evaluation of Marginal Accuracy and Color Stability of Lithium Disilicate Laminate Veneer Compared to Hybrid Ceramic Veneer

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-290
Author(s):  
Eman El-Malah ◽  
Sahar Abd El-Aziz ◽  
Suad Hassan
Medicina ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (11) ◽  
pp. 749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satheesh B. Haralur ◽  
Noura Raqe S. Alqahtani ◽  
Fatimah Alhassan Mujayri

Background and aim: All-ceramic prosthesis is widely used in modern dental practice because of its improved physico-mechanical and optical properties. These restorations are exposed to coloring agents from various nutrition and beverages in the oral cavity. Long-term color stability is critical for the success of these restorative materials. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of common beverages and mouthwash on the color stability of lithium disilicate (LD), monolithic zirconia (MZ) and bilayer zirconia (BZ) surfaces. Material and methods: Thirty disc-shaped specimens from each material were fabricated; each group was subdivided (n = 10) according to coffee, green tea and chlorhexidine immersion solutions. The baseline color of ceramic discs was recorded according to the CIE L*a*b* system with a portable spectrophotometer. The second measurement was recorded after 3000 thermocycling and immersion in coloring agents for 7 days. The mean color difference was calculated and data were compared with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney post hoc tests (0.05). Results: ΔE values for LD with the immersion of coffee, tea, and Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) were 1.78, 2.241 and 1.58, respectively. Corresponding ΔE values for MZ were 5.60, 5.19, and 4.86; marginally higher than the clinically acceptable level of 3.5. Meanwhile, BZ showed better color stability compared to MZ with ΔE values of 4.22, 2.11 and 1.43. Conclusion: Among the ceramics evaluated, LD ceramic was found to be more color stable, while MZ ceramics displayed a higher susceptibility to discoloration. MZ and BZ ceramic colors were significantly altered with coffee immersion, while LD ceramics were more affected by green tea.


2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aida Seyidaliyeva ◽  
Stefan Rues ◽  
Zinonas Evagorou ◽  
Alexander J. Hassel ◽  
Peter Rammelsberg ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-30
Author(s):  
Ibrahim , Mohamed ◽  
Farghaly , Ehab ◽  
Badih , Rasha

2018 ◽  
Vol 119 (4) ◽  
pp. 632-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni-Sotiria Palla ◽  
Eleana Kontonasaki ◽  
Nikolaos Kantiranis ◽  
Lambrini Papadopoulou ◽  
Triantafyllia Zorba ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. e16
Author(s):  
I.B.L. Soares-Rusu ◽  
C.A. Villavicencio-Espinoza ◽  
N.A. Oliveira ◽  
L. Wang ◽  
H.M. Honório ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Soares Diniz ◽  
Letícia Fecury Bogéa de Albuquerque ◽  
Rudys de Jesus Rodolfo Tavarez ◽  
Eduardo Buozzi Moffa ◽  
Andréa Dias Neves Lago ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 852-857
Author(s):  
Fahim Vohra ◽  
Sulaiman Alnajashi ◽  
Abdulwahab Aljardi ◽  
Modhi Al Deeb ◽  
Laila Al Deeb ◽  
...  

The aim was to assess the acceptable thickness of monolithic Lithium Disilicate (LD) ceramic in masking of Titanium (Ti) implant abutment by comparison to Zirconium (Zr) crowns through color matching. Forty LD and 10 Zr copings (control) using Hot-pressing and CAD-CAM techniques were fabricated. A standard Ti abutment (Straumann, ITI, Basel, Switzerland) was used as foundation substrate. LD crowns were divided into different thickness [1.0 mm (n = 10), 1.2 mm (n = 10), 1.5 mm (n = 10) and 1.8 mm (n = 10)] and 10 Zr copings (control) had 0.5 mm thickness. Different crown materials and crown thicknesses resulted in 5 study groups designated as Zr-Ti-0.5, LD-Ti1.0, LD-Ti-1.2, LD-Ti-1.5 and LD-Ti-1.8. Specimens were cemented to Ti abutments and using a spectrophotometer the difference of color for specimen and controls was determined by comparing ΔL, Δa and Δb (CIELab color system) and an overall ΔE. These were statistically compared using analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc multiple comparisons. Among LD specimens with Ti abutments, lowest color difference was achieved for LD-Ti-1.8 (2.3 ± 0.31) and the highest color difference was for LD-Ti-1.0 (4.93 ± 0.45). The lowest ΔE was recorded for Zr copings (control), which was lower than (p < 0 01) LD crowns of 1.0 and 1.2 mm thickness. LD crown thickness had a significant effect on ΔE (color difference) on Ti abutments. Masking of Ti abutments by 1.5 mm LD crowns was comparable to Zr specimens (control). Lithium disilicate crown of 1.5 mm thickness showed statistically comparable color stability to 0.5 mm Zr copings on Ti implant abutments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document