scholarly journals MIDLUTEAL COLOUR DOPPLER ULTRASONOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF UTERINE BLOOD FLOW IN UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY AND RECURRENT MISCARRIAGE

2006 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44
Author(s):  
Wafaa Aboul Enien ◽  
Amal Azzam
2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 338-349
Author(s):  
K. El-Shahat ◽  
A. Abo El-Maaty ◽  
M. Helmy ◽  
Y. El Baghdady

The present study was undertaken to investigate the haemodynamics of the ovary and uterus in infertile mares using power and colour Doppler ultrasonography. Forty-seven Arabian mares were handled in the current work through several examinations. Based on the breeding history complaints, physical, vaginal examination and Doppler examination, 12 mares were found to be suffering from abnormal ovarian structures (Experiment I). In addition, nine mares with normal cyclic activity were kept as control. Another 16 mares were found to suffer from abnormal uterine conditions and 10 mares with normal uterine findings served as control (Experiment II). Blood flows to the anovulatory follicle, ovarian inactivity, granulosa cell tumour were compared to those to the dominant follicle and luteal blood flow. Uterine blood flow of cysts, abnormal uterine fluids (endometritis) during estrus and diestrus were compared to normal uterine vascularisation during estrus, diestrus and post-mating. Results showed that granulosa cell tumour had the highest red colour blood flow and total colour blood flow area. Blue colour blood flow area of the corpus luteum was higher compared to the dominant follicle and inactive ovary. Uteri with uterine cyst and abnormal uterine fluids during estrus of infertile mares had high red colour blood flow, blue colour blood flow and power blood flow areas compared to normal uterus during estrus. It could be concluded that Doppler ultrasound could distinguish between normal ovaries with normal or abnormal structures. Moreover, the increased uterine blood flow area of mares with abnormal fluids in their uteri (endometritis) and uterine cysts could be distinguished by comparison to the normal uterine blood flow during estrus.


2015 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 453 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Pietropolli ◽  
Valentina Bruno ◽  
M. V. Capogna ◽  
S. Bernardini ◽  
E. Piccione ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Carmen Ali zarad ◽  
Mohamed Hafez Mohamed ◽  
Waleed Said Abo Shanab

Abstract Background The study aimed to compare the values of uterine artery Doppler indices including resistance index (RI), pulsatility index (PI), and systolic/diastolic (S/D) ratios in fertile female and female with unexplained infertility and investigate their association with unexplained infertility. This study included 70 women divided into two groups. Study group included 40 women with unexplained infertility and control group included 30 fertile women. Results The mean ages of study and control groups were 26.9 and 28.5 years respectively. In infertile group, the mean values of uterine arteries resistance index (RI), pulsatility index (PI), and systolic/diastolic (S/D) ratios were 0.9, 2.9, and 8.0 respectively. In the fertile control group, mean RI and PI values and S/D ratio were 0.6, 1.5, and 2.7 respectively. There was statistically significant difference as regards RI, PI, and S/D ratios between study and control groups. The best cut off values of RI, PI, and S/D ratios for predicting increased uterine blood flow impedance were more than 0.67, 1.95, and 3 respectively with sensitivity of 100%, 95%, and 100% respectively, specificity of 96.7%, 86.7%, and 96.7% respectively, and diagnostic accuracy of 98.6%, 91.42%, and 98.57% respectively. Conclusion Uterine artery Doppler indices mean values were higher in unexplained infertility women than fertile women. Uterine artery Doppler indices have high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of high uterine blood flow impedance. High uterine blood flow impedance diagnosed by uterine artery Doppler may contribute in the etiology of unexplained infertility. Uterine artery Doppler should be included in investigation of unexplained infertility.


Ob Gyn News ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 42 (13) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Kate Johnson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document