A Systematic Review on Popularity, Application and Characteristics of Protein Secondary Structure Prediction Tools

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaheh Kashani-Amin ◽  
Ozra Tabatabaei-Malazy ◽  
Amirhossein Sakhteman ◽  
Bagher Larijani ◽  
Azadeh Ebrahim-Habibi

Background: Prediction of proteins’ secondary structure is one of the major steps in the generation of homology models. These models provide structural information which is used to design suitable ligands for potential medicinal targets. However, selecting a proper tool between multiple Secondary Structure Prediction (SSP) options is challenging. The current study is an insight into currently favored methods and tools, within various contexts. Objective: A systematic review was performed for a comprehensive access to recent (2013-2016) studies which used or recommended protein SSP tools. Methods: Three databases, Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus were systematically searched and 99 out of the 209 studies were finally found eligible to extract data. Results: Four categories of applications for 59 retrieved SSP tools were: (I) prediction of structural features of a given sequence, (II) evaluation of a method, (III) providing input for a new SSP method and (IV) integrating an SSP tool as a component for a program. PSIPRED was found to be the most popular tool in all four categories. JPred and tools utilizing PHD (Profile network from HeiDelberg) method occupied second and third places of popularity in categories I and II. JPred was only found in the two first categories, while PHD was present in three fields. Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive insight into the recent usage of SSP tools which could be helpful for selecting a proper tool.

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 246-253
Author(s):  
Anindya Sundar Panja ◽  
Bidyut Bandopadhyay ◽  
Akash Nag ◽  
Smarajit Maiti

Background: Our present investigation was conducted to explore the computational algorithm for the protein secondary structure prediction as per the property of evolutionary transient and large number (each 50) of homologous mesophilic-thermophilic proteins. </P><P> Objectives: These mesophilic-thermophilic proteins were used for numerical measurement of helix-sheetcoil and turn tendency for which each amino-acid residue is screened to build up the propensity-table. Methods: In the current study, two different propensity windows have been introduced that allowed predicting the secondary structure of protein more than 80% accuracy. Results: Using this propensity matrix and dynamic algorithm-based programme, a significant and decisive outcome in the determination of protein (both thermophilic and mesophilic) secondary structure was noticed over the previous algorithm based programme. It was demonstrated after comparison with other standard methods including DSSP adopted by PDB with the help of multiple comparisons ANOVA and Dunnett’s t-test. Conclusion: The PSSD is of great importance in the prediction of structural features of any unknown, unresolved proteins. It is also useful in the studies of proteins structure-function relationship.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregor Urban ◽  
Mirko Torrisi ◽  
Christophe N. Magnan ◽  
Gianluca Pollastri ◽  
Pierre Baldi

AbstractThe use of evolutionary profiles to predict protein secondary structure, as well as other protein structural features, has been standard practice since the 1990s. Using profiles in the input of such predictors, in place or in addition to the sequence itself, leads to significantly more accurate predictors. While profiles can enhance structural signals, their role remains somewhat surprising as proteins do not use profiles when folding in vivo. Furthermore, the same sequence-based redundancy reduction protocols initially derived to train and evaluate sequence-based predictors, have been applied to train and evaluate profile-based predictors. This can lead to unfair comparisons since profile may facilitate the bleeding of information between training and test sets. Here we use the extensively studied problem of secondary structure prediction to better evaluate the role of profiles and show that: (1) high levels of profile similarity between training and test proteins are observed when using standard sequence-based redundancy protocols; (2) the gain in accuracy for profile-based predictors, over sequence-based predictors, strongly relies on these high levels of profile similarity between training and test proteins; and (3) the overall accuracy of a profile-based predictor on a given protein dataset provides a biased measure when trying to estimate the actual accuracy of the predictor, or when comparing it to other predictors. We show, however, that this bias can be avoided by implementing a new protocol (EVALpro) which evaluates the accuracy of profile-based predictors as a function of the profile similarity between training and test proteins. Such a protocol not only allows for a fair comparison of the predictors on equally hard or easy examples, but also completely removes the need for selecting arbitrary similarity cutoffs when selecting test proteins. The EVALpro program is available for download from the SCRATCH suite (http://scratch.proteomics.ics.uci.edu).


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diksha Priya Lotun ◽  
Charlotte Cochard ◽  
Fabio R.J Vieira ◽  
Juliana Silva Bernardes

2dSS is a web-server for visualising and comparing secondary structure predictions. It provides two main functionalities: 2D-alignment and compare predictions. The “2D-alignment” has been designed to visualise conserved secondary structure elements in a multiple sequence alignment (MSA). From this we can study the secondary structure content of homologous proteins (a protein family) and highlight its structural patterns. The “compare predictions” has been designed to compare the output of several secondary structure prediction tools, and check their accuracy when compared with real secondary structure elements extracted from 3D-structure. 2dSS provides a comprehensive representation of protein secondary structure elements, and it can be used to visualise and compare secondary structures of any prediction tool.Availabilityhttp://genome.lcqb.upmc.fr/2dss/


Author(s):  
Roma Chandra

Protein structure prediction is one of the important goals in the area of bioinformatics and biotechnology. Prediction methods include structure prediction of both secondary and tertiary structures of protein. Protein secondary structure prediction infers knowledge related to presence of helixes, sheets and coils in a polypeptide chain whereas protein tertiary structure prediction infers knowledge related to three dimensional structures of proteins. Protein secondary structures represent the possible motifs or regular expressions represented as patterns that are predicted from primary protein sequence in the form of alpha helix, betastr and and coils. The secondary structure prediction is useful as it infers information related to the structure and function of unknown protein sequence. There are various secondary structure prediction methods used to predict about helixes, sheets and coils. Based on these methods there are various prediction tools under study. This study includes prediction of hemoglobin using various tools. The results produced inferred knowledge with reference to percentage of amino acids participating to produce helices, sheets and coils. PHD and DSC produced the best of the results out of all the tools used.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document