6 Setting Expectations and Monitoring Progress

Keyword(s):  
PLoS Medicine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e1001731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ties Boerma ◽  
Patrick Eozenou ◽  
David Evans ◽  
Tim Evans ◽  
Marie-Paule Kieny ◽  
...  

ACS Nano ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liping Song ◽  
Jing Chen ◽  
Ben Bin Xu ◽  
Youju Huang

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (S4) ◽  
pp. S236-S236
Author(s):  
Hazel D. Dean ◽  
Benedict I. Truman ◽  
Jonathan H. Mermin

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 489-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris J. Mcowen ◽  
Sarah Ivory ◽  
Matthew J. R. Dixon ◽  
Eugenie C. Regan ◽  
Andreas Obrecht ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 182 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona M. Cuthill ◽  
Colin A. Espie ◽  
Sally-Anne Cooper

BackgroundThere is no reliable and valid self-report measure of depressive symptoms for people with learning disabilities.AimsTo develop a scale for individuals with learning disability, and a supplementary scale for carers.MethodItems were generated from a range of assessment scales and through focus groups. A draft scale was piloted and field tested using matched groups of people with or without depression, and their carers. The scale was also administered to a group without learning disabilities for criterion validation.ResultsThe Glasgow Depression Scale for people with a Learning Disability (GDS–LD) differentiated depression and non-depression groups, correlated with the Beck Depression Inventory – II (r=0.88), had good test – retest reliability (r=0.97) and internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.90), and a cut-off score (13) yielded 96% sensitivity and 90% specificity. The Carer Supplement was also reliable (r=0.98; α=0.88), correlating with the GDS–LD (r=0.93).ConclusionsBoth scales appear useful for screening, monitoring progress and contributing to outcome appraisal.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 324-327
Author(s):  
Rareș Macrea ◽  
Petronela Macrea

Abstract The present trend towards globalization has led to people changing their views on possible threats to their existence. Nowadays, we witness a diversification of vulnerabilities and threats to human security, as well as a progressive reduction of our resilience. The article attempts to correlate the 5 dimensions of national security, as identified by the Copenhagen School of Security, with the problems of the Romanian educational system, explaining how these problems can become threats to the security of Romanian citizens. It offers an overview of the problems of the Romanian educational system, and the threats and vulnerabilities derived from them towards human security. It also suggests solutions to problems and indicators for monitoring progress.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document