scholarly journals Stress Distribution in Tooth Supported Removable Bridge with Long Saddle. Part 1. Stress Analysis at Abutment Teeth and Alveolar Bone by 2-Dimensional Finite Element Method.

1998 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 823-831
Author(s):  
Yoshihisa Inoue ◽  
Akihiro Kuroiwa ◽  
Akira Ogata ◽  
Akira Suzuki ◽  
Takafumi Ohno ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 425-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Piza Pellizzer ◽  
Fellippo Ramos Verri ◽  
Sandra Lúcia Dantas de Moraes ◽  
Rosse Mary Falcón-Antenucci ◽  
Paulo Sérgio Perri de Carvalho ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution in implants of regular platforms and of wide diameter with different sizes of hexagon by the 3-dimensional finite element method. We used simulated 3-dimensional models with the aid of Solidworks 2006 and Rhinoceros 4.0 software for the design of the implant and abutment and the InVesalius software for the design of the bone. Each model represented a block of bone from the mandibular molar region with an implant 10 mm in length and different diameters. Model A was an implant 3.75 mm/regular hexagon, model B was an implant 5.00 mm/regular hexagon, and model C was an implant 5.00 mm/expanded hexagon. A load of 200 N was applied in the axial, lateral, and oblique directions. At implant, applying the load (axial, lateral, and oblique), the 3 models presented stress concentration at the threads in the cervical and middle regions, and the stress was higher for model A. At the abutment, models A and B showed a similar stress distribution, concentrated at the cervical and middle third; model C showed the highest stresses. On the cortical bone, the stress was concentrated at the cervical region for the 3 models and was higher for model A. In the trabecular bone, the stresses were less intense and concentrated around the implant body, and were more intense for model A. Among the models of wide diameter (models B and C), model B (implant 5.00 mm/regular hexagon) was more favorable with regard to distribution of stresses. Model A (implant 3.75 mm/regular hexagon) showed the largest areas and the most intense stress, and model B (implant 5.00 mm/regular hexagon) showed a more favorable stress distribution. The highest stresses were observed in the application of lateral load.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document