Peter R. Anstey, John Locke and Natural Philosophy

2016 ◽  
Vol 61 (76) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
Carmen SILVA

Reseña de <div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>Peter R. Anstey, </span><span><em>John Locke and Natural Philosophy</em></span><span>, Oxford University Press, Oxford, Reino Unido, 2013, 252 pp. </span></p></div></div></div>

Locke Studies ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 167-194
Author(s):  
Jonathan Craig Walmsley

Peter Anstey’s book John Locke on Natural Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011) (henceforth JLNP), presented an interpretation of Locke’s work on science and medicine, and how this shaped his philosophical views. It was wide-ranging in scope and often impressively detailed. It raised a number of questions about Locke’s relationship to the work of J. B. van Helmont, his collaboration with Thomas Sydenham, and the overall chronology and trajectory of his natural philosophical interests. It also occasioned a number of questions about methodology in the history of philosophy and how we should construct an interpretation of a thinker like Locke from the published, manuscript and historical records available. Some of these questions were posed explicitly in a ‘Review Article’ in these pages.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document