scholarly journals Expanding Opportunities for Professional Development: Utilization of Twitter by Early Career Women in Academic Medicine and Science

10.2196/11140 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. e11140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime D Lewis ◽  
Kathleen E Fane ◽  
Angela M Ingraham ◽  
Ayesha Khan ◽  
Anne M Mills ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime D Lewis ◽  
Kathleen E Fane ◽  
Angela M Ingraham ◽  
Ayesha Khan ◽  
Anne M Mills ◽  
...  

UNSTRUCTURED The number of women entering medical school and careers in science is increasing; however, women remain the minority of those in senior faculty and leadership positions. Barriers contributing to the shortage of women in academics and academic leadership are numerous, including a shortage of role models and mentors. Thus, achieving equity in a timelier manner will require more than encouraging women to pursue these fields of study or waiting long enough for those in the pipelines to be promoted. Social media provides new ways to connect and augments traditional forms of communication. These alternative avenues may allow women in academic medicine to obtain the support they are otherwise lacking. In this perspective, we reflect on the role of Twitter as a supplemental method for navigating the networks of academic medicine. The discussion includes the use of Twitter to obtain (1) access to role models, (2) peer-to-peer interactions, and continuous education, and (3) connections with those entering the pipeline—students, trainees, and mentees. This perspective also offers suggestions for developing a Twitter network. By participating in the “Twittersphere,” women in academic medicine may enhance personal and academic relationships that will assist in closing the gender divide.


2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 1244-1251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Magrane ◽  
Deborah Helitzer ◽  
Page Morahan ◽  
Shine Chang ◽  
Katharine Gleason ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 752-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel B. Levine ◽  
Fenny Lin ◽  
David E. Kern ◽  
Scott M. Wright ◽  
Joseph Carrese

Author(s):  
Rita Peihua Zhang ◽  
Sarah Holdsworth ◽  
Michelle Turner ◽  
Mary Myla Andamon
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Hui Lim ◽  
Jingxuan Quek ◽  
Phoebe Wen Lin Tay ◽  
Cheng Han Ng ◽  
Vathsala Anantharaman ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. ar49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cara Margherio ◽  
M. Claire Horner-Devine ◽  
Sheri J. Y. Mizumori ◽  
Joyce W. Yen

BRAINS: Broadening the Representation of Academic Investigators in NeuroScience is a National Institutes of Health–funded, national program that addresses challenges to the persistence of diverse early-career neuroscientists. In doing so, BRAINS aims to advance diversity in neuroscience by increasing career advancement and retention of post-PhD, early-career neuroscientists from underrepresented groups (URGs). The comprehensive professional development program is structured to catalyze conversations specific to URGs in neuroscience and explicitly addresses factors known to impact persistence such as a weak sense of belonging to the scientific community, isolation and solo status, inequitable access to resources that impact career success, and marginalization from informal networks and mentoring relationships. While we do not yet have data on the long-term impact of the BRAINS program on participants’ career trajectory and persistence, we introduce the BRAINS program theory and report early quantitative and qualitative data on shorter-term individual impacts within the realms of career-advancing behaviors and career experiences. These early results suggest promising, positive career productivity, increased self-efficacy, stronger sense of belonging, and new perspectives on navigating careers for BRAINS participants. We finish by discussing recommendations for future professional development programs and research designed to broaden participation in the biomedical and life sciences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document