EmpathicCare4All. Study protocol for the development of an educational intervention for medical and interpreting students on empathic communication in interpreter-mediated medical consultations. A study based on the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework phases 0-2. (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Demi Krystallidou ◽  
Heidi Salaets ◽  
Cornelia Wermuth ◽  
Peter Pype

UNSTRUCTURED Doctors express empathy infrequently and they do not respond sufficiently to patients’ emotional statements. Empathy is compromised even more in cross-cultural and linguistically diverse healthcare settings where doctor-patient communication is mediated by interpreters. Empathy in interpreter-mediated clinical communication has received insufficient attention in medical education and even less in interpreter education. This project aims to develop a research-based educational intervention for undergraduate medical- and interpreting students on empathic communication in interpreter-mediated consultations. The project relies on the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions (phases 0-2). Phase 0: 1. Systematic literature reviews on i) complex interventions on clinical communication training between medical students and students from a different field of study, ii) on cross-cultural and interlingual clinical communication training, iii) emotion management in interpreter-mediated consultations. 2. Analysis of video recorded interpreter-mediated consultations by means of the Empathic Communication Coding System (ECCS) and multimodal interaction analysis. 3. Verification of findings by means of video-stimulated recall interviews with doctors, patients and interpreters. Phase 1: Development of training intervention and validation. Phase 2: Feasibility testing and proof-of-concept study/ event. The transfer of the findings into the curricula of both faculties will pave the way for better trained professionals who will be able to co-construct and manage empathic communication more effectively in linguistically and culturally diverse contexts. Both groups of professionals will help improve the health and well-being of patients with linguistically and culturally diverse backgrounds, who might often experience a bias and inequality in the provision of healthcare. Interpreters trained to perform in specialized clinical settings and doctors trained to work in linguistically and culturally diverse settings will enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of hospitals and other healthcare centers and public services in which they operate, contributing, in this way, to better social welfare and social cohesion.

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajalakshmi Lakshman ◽  
Simon Griffin ◽  
Wendy Hardeman ◽  
Annie Schiff ◽  
Ann Louise Kinmonth ◽  
...  

Introduction. We describe our experience of using the Medical Research Council framework on complex interventions to guide the development and evaluation of an intervention to prevent obesity by modifying infant feeding behaviours.Methods. We reviewed the epidemiological evidence on early life risk factors for obesity and interventions to prevent obesity in this age group. The review suggested prevention of excess weight gain in bottle-fed babies and appropriate weaning as intervention targets; hence we undertook systematic reviews to further our understanding of these behaviours. We chose theory and behaviour change techniques that demonstrated evidence of effectiveness in altering dietary behaviours. We subsequently developed intervention materials and evaluation tools and conducted qualitative studies with mothers (intervention recipients) and healthcare professionals (intervention deliverers) to refine them. We developed a questionnaire to assess maternal attitudes and feeding practices to understand the mechanism of any intervention effects.Conclusions. In addition to informing development of our specific intervention and evaluation materials, use of the Medical Research Council framework has helped to build a generalisable evidence base for early life nutritional interventions. However, the process is resource intensive and prolonged, and this should be taken into account by public health research funders. This trial is registered with ISRTCN:20814693Baby Milk Trial.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-274
Author(s):  
Markus Saarijärvi ◽  
Lars Wallin ◽  
Ewa-Lena Bratt

Complex interventions of varying degrees of complexity are commonly used and evaluated in cardiovascular nursing and allied professions. Such interventions are increasingly tested using randomized trial designs. However, process evaluations are seldom used to better understand the results of these trials. Process evaluation aims to understand how complex interventions create change by evaluating implementation, mechanisms of impact, and the surrounding context when delivering an intervention. As such, this method can illuminate important mechanisms and clarify variation in results. In this article, process evaluation is described according to the Medical Research Council guidance and its use exemplified through a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a transition program for adolescents with chronic conditions.


Evaluation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Louise Brand ◽  
Cath Quinn ◽  
Mark Pearson ◽  
Charlotte Lennox ◽  
Christabel Owens ◽  
...  

Medical Research Council guidelines recognise the need to optimise complex interventions prior to full trial through greater understanding of underlying theory and formative process evaluation, yet there are few examples. A realist approach to formative process evaluation makes a unique contribution through a focus on theory formalisation and abstraction. The success of an intervention is dependent on the extent to which it gels or jars with existing provision and can be successfully transferred to new contexts. Interventions with underlying programme theory about how they work, for whom, and under which circumstances will be better able to adapt to work with (rather than against) different services, individuals, and settings. In this methodological article, we describe and illustrate how a realist approach to formative process evaluation develops contextualised intervention theory that can underpin more adaptable and scalable interventions. We discuss challenges and benefits of this approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document