The CHLEW Couples Study: Protocol for a Study of Stress, Hazardous Drinking, and Intimate Partner Aggression among Sexual Minority Women and their Partners (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy Veldhuis ◽  
Lauren Porsch ◽  
Lauren Bochicchio ◽  
Jacqueline Campbell ◽  
Timothy Johnson ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Large gaps exist in research on alcohol use and intimate partner aggression (IPA) among sexual minority women (SMW; e.g., lesbian, bisexual). Dyadic research with SMW and their partners can illuminate how couple-level factors operate in conjunction with individual-level factors to shape well-being in this understudied and vulnerable population. Given the traditionally gendered lens in which women are primarily viewed as victims and men as perpetrators, understanding the dynamics of IPA in same-sex female couples can also advance research and practice related to IPA more generally. OBJECTIVE Guided by a recent extension of the minority stress model that includes relational (couple-level) sexual minority stress, and by the I3 (I-Cubed) theoretical perspective on IPA, we will collect individual and dyadic data to better characterize the links between hazardous drinking (HD) and IPA among SMW and their partners. The study aims are to (1) Examine associations among minority stress, HD, and IPA in SMW and their partners. Minority stressors will be assessed as both individual and couple-level constructs, thus further extending the minority stress model; (2) Examine potential mediators and moderators of the associations among minority stress, HD, and IPA; and (3) Test models guided by the I3 theoretical perspective that include instigating (e.g., relationship conflict), impelling (e.g., negative affect, trait anger), and inhibiting (e.g., relationship commitment, emotion regulation) or dis-inhibiting (e.g., HD) influences on IPA perpetration. METHODS This United States National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded project will draw from a large and diverse cohort of SMW currently enrolled in the Chicago Health and Life Experiences of Women (CHLEW) study—a 21-year longitudinal study of risk factors and consequences associated with SMW’s HD. SMW currently enrolled in the CHLEW study, and their partners, will be invited to participate in the CHLEW Couples Study. Analyzing dyadic data using Actor Partner Interdependence Models (APIMs), we will examine how each partner’s minority stress, HD, and IPA experiences are associated with both her own and her partner’s minority stress, HD, and IPA perpetration. RESULTS Data collection began in February 2021 and will likely continue through 2023. Initial results should be available by mid-2024. CONCLUSIONS The CHLEW Couples Study will fill important gaps in knowledge and will provide the basis for future research aimed at clarifying the causal pathways linking HD and IPA among SMW. This will support the development of culturally appropriate targeted individual and dyadic prevention and intervention strategies.




2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin J. Lewis ◽  
Robert J. Milletich ◽  
Michelle L. Kelley ◽  
Alex Woody


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Counselman-Carpenter ◽  
Alex Redcay

This theoretical paper explores the need to use posttraumatic growth (PTG) as a framework when studying sexual minority women (SMW) who are survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) to examine the relationship between risk factors such as stress, anxiety and alcohol use and to understand the role of protective factors through mining for the presence of posttraumatic growth (PTG). Despite a call for continued research in this highly vulnerable population, representative studies of SMW and PTG remain extremely limited. Research that examines the relationship between IPV, behavioral health issues, and posttraumatic growth would provide the opportunity to develop tailored intervention models and opportunities for program development to decrease isolation and increase factors of posttraumatic growth. In particular, the impact of how interpersonal relationships as potential mediators and/or outcomes of posttraumatic growth (PTG) needs to be explored more thoroughly. PTG is a valuable framework for vulnerable populations such as sexual minority women because it focuses on how transformative change may result from traumatic experiences such as surviving IPV.



2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 572-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan E. Sutter ◽  
Annie E. Rabinovitch ◽  
Michael A. Trujillo ◽  
Paul B. Perrin ◽  
Lisa D. Goldberg ◽  
...  

This study explored patterns of intimate partner violence (IPV) victimization and perpetration in 150 sexual minority women (SMW): 25.3% had been sexually victimized, 34% physically victimized, 76% psychologically victimized, and 29.3% suffered an IPV-related injury. A latent class analysis found four behavioral patterns: (1) minor-only psychological perpetration and victimization; (2) no IPV; (3) minor–severe psychological, physical assault, and injury victimization, and minor-only psychological, physical, and injury perpetration; and (4) severe psychological, sexual, physical assault, and injury victimization and perpetration. Individuals who experienced and/or perpetrated all types experienced the greatest heterosexism at work, school, and in other contexts.



2020 ◽  
pp. 088626052097621
Author(s):  
Jillian R. Scheer ◽  
John E. Pachankis ◽  
Richard Bränström

Reducing structural drivers of intimate partner violence (IPV), including gender inequity in education, employment, and health, surrounding women worldwide represents a clear public health priority. Within countries, some women are at disproportionate risk of IPV compared to other women, including sexual minority women, immigrant women, and women in poverty. However, limited research has assessed women’s IPV risk and related circumstances, including police involvement following IPV experiences and IPV-related worry, across sexual orientation, immigration status, and socioeconomic status in a population-based survey of women across countries. Further, few studies have examined IPV against minority women as a function of gender-based structural stigma. This study aimed to determine whether gender-based structural stigma is associated with IPV and related circumstances among European women; examine minority-majority IPV disparities; and assess whether structural stigma is associated with IPV disparities. We used the population-based 2012 Violence Against Women Survey ( n = 42,000) administered across 28 European Union countries: 724 (1.7%) identified as sexual minority, 841 (2.0%) as immigrant, and 2,272 (5.4%) as living in poverty. Women in high gender-based structural stigma countries had a greater risk of past-12-month IPV (AOR: 1.18, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.34) and IPV-related worry (AOR: 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.15) than women in low structural stigma countries. All minority women were at disproportionate risk of IPV and IPV-related worry compared to majority women. Associations between gender-based structural stigma and IPV and related circumstances differed across minority status. Country-level structural stigma can possibly perpetuate women’s risk of IPV and related circumstances. Associations between structural stigma and IPV and related circumstances for sexual minority women, immigrant women, and women in poverty call for research into the IPV experiences of minority populations across structural contexts.



2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 458-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurel B. Watson ◽  
Morgan Grotewiel ◽  
Michelle Farrell ◽  
Jessica Marshik ◽  
Melinda Schneider


LGBT Health ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 407-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen H. Logie ◽  
Ashley Lacombe-Duncan ◽  
Rachel K. MacKenzie ◽  
Tonia Poteat




Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document