Survey of Chief Student Affairs Officers Regarding Relevance of Graduate Preparation of New Professionals

NASPA Journal ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Herdlein

The study examines the perceptions of chief student affairs officers at 50 colleges/universities in order to provide insights into the extent to which preparation programs are effectively preparing new professionals for the field. The results of the study will assist faculty teaching in these programs in future decisions regarding curricula; provide a rich source of information to practitioners interested in the preparation of new professionals entering the field; and delineate specific areas of skill development, knowledge, and personal traits important for advancement in the field. Results indicate that there may be a need to consider additional course work in several content areas.

NASPA Journal ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan W. Burkard ◽  
Darnell C. Cole ◽  
Molly Ott ◽  
Tara Stoflet

The study examines the perceptions of 104 mid- and senior-level student affairs administrators of positions, responsibilities, competencies, and theories important for professional practice for new student affairs professionals. In regard to competencies, the results of this study provide important information about preprofessional abilities that are integral to professional practice, and participants also identified several competencies not identified in prior research that may be important to positions involving high contact with students. These results, then, provide vital information for curriculum development in graduate preparation programs and for professional development training for new professionals.


NASPA Journal ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joy Gaston Gayles ◽  
Bridget T Kelly

The purpose of this study was to assess individuals’ perceptions of and experiences with diversity in the curriculum of graduate preparation programs in student affairs. We were particularly interested in how diversity is incorporated into the curriculum and how individuals have been able to apply what they learned about diversity issues to student affairs practice. Using focus group interviews, data were collected from graduate students and student affairs practitioners. Three major themes that focus on requiring diversity in the curriculum, what should be included in diversity courses, and effective ways of linking theory to practice are discussed.


NASPA Journal ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 299-305
Author(s):  
Glenda Earwood-Smith ◽  
Carmen A. Jordan-Cox ◽  
Gué Hudson ◽  
Mike U. Smith

1993 ◽  
Vol 1993 (63) ◽  
pp. 95-107
Author(s):  
James A. Gold ◽  
Dennis C. Golden ◽  
Thomas J. Quatroche

10.28945/2344 ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 035-052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosemary J Perez

Prior research exploring professional socialization in student affairs has been grounded in models that do not fully capture the distinct features of the field. Moreover, these studies have primarily focused on the transition into full-time work positions, and they have captured what happens to new professionals rather than how individuals understand their socialization experiences. With these gaps in mind, this conceptual paper presents a new model of professional socialization in student affairs graduate preparation programs that draws upon literature in the helping professions (i.e., nursing, social work), research on doctoral students and pre-tenure faculty, and the theoretical frameworks of sensemaking and self-authorship to highlight the dynamic relationship between individuals and organizations during the socialization process. Specifically, this model attempts to illuminate the cognitive mechanisms that undergird how individuals interpret their professional socialization. In doing so, the model proposes different ways individuals may make sense of their student affairs graduate training experiences based on (a) whether or not they encounter discrepancies and (b) their developmental capacity for self-authorship. The conceptual model presented here has implications for shaping graduate level coursework and fieldwork within student affairs preparation programs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document