Practice Patterns and Challenges of Performing and Interpreting Prostate MRI: A Survey by the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Disease–Focused Panel

2021 ◽  
Vol 216 (4) ◽  
pp. 952-959
Author(s):  
Silvia D. Chang ◽  
Daniel J. A. Margolis ◽  
Baris Turkbey ◽  
Abigail A. Arnold ◽  
Sadhna Verma
Radiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 296 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio C. Westphalen ◽  
Charles E. McCulloch ◽  
Jordan M. Anaokar ◽  
Sandeep Arora ◽  
Nimrod S. Barashi ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 1807-1812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Spilseth ◽  
Daniel J. Margolis ◽  
Sangeet Ghai ◽  
Nayana U. Patel ◽  
Andrew B. Rosenkrantz

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 1255-1260
Author(s):  
Moon Hyung Choi ◽  
Young Joon Lee ◽  
Seung Eun Jung

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 1175-1187
Author(s):  
Rachel Glade ◽  
Erin Taylor ◽  
Deborah S. Culbertson ◽  
Christin Ray

Purpose This clinical focus article provides an overview of clinical models currently being used for the provision of comprehensive aural rehabilitation (AR) for adults with cochlear implants (CIs) in the Unites States. Method Clinical AR models utilized by hearing health care providers from nine clinics across the United States were discussed with regard to interprofessional AR practice patterns in the adult CI population. The clinical models were presented in the context of existing knowledge and gaps in the literature. Future directions were proposed for optimizing the provision of AR for the adult CI patient population. Findings/Conclusions There is a general agreement that AR is an integral part of hearing health care for adults with CIs. While the provision of AR is feasible in different clinical practice settings, service delivery models are variable across hearing health care professionals and settings. AR may include interprofessional collaboration among surgeons, audiologists, and speech-language pathologists with varying roles based on the characteristics of a particular setting. Despite various existing barriers, the clinical practice patterns identified here provide a starting point toward a more standard approach to comprehensive AR for adults with CIs.


2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura J. Ball ◽  
Joanne Lasker

Abstract For adults with acquired communication impairment, particularly those who have communication disorders associated with stroke or neurodegenerative disease, communication partners play an important role in establishing and maintaining communicative competence. In this paper, we assemble some evidence on this topic and integrate it with current preferred practice patterns (American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 2004). Our goals are to help speech-language pathologists (SLPs) identify and describe partner-based communication strategies for adults with acquired impairment, implement evidence-based approaches for teaching strategies to communication partners, and employ a Personnel Framework (Binger et al., 2012) to clarify partners? roles in acquiring and supporting communication tools for individuals with acquired impairments. We offer specific guidance about AAC techniques and message selection for communication partners involved with chronic, degenerative, and end of life communication. We discuss research and provide examples of communication partner supports for person(s) with aphasia and person(s) with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who have complex communication needs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document