scholarly journals The impact and collateral damage of COVID-19 on prostate MRI and guided biopsy operations: Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Cancer Disease-Focused Panel survey analysis

Author(s):  
Devaki Shilpa S. Surasi ◽  
Xuemei Wang ◽  
Tharakeswara K. Bathala ◽  
Hyunsoo Hwang ◽  
Sandeep Arora ◽  
...  
Radiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 296 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio C. Westphalen ◽  
Charles E. McCulloch ◽  
Jordan M. Anaokar ◽  
Sandeep Arora ◽  
Nimrod S. Barashi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor C. Wakwe ◽  
Ehimen. P. Odum ◽  
Collins Amadi

Urology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. S297-S298
Author(s):  
E. Unluer ◽  
M. Demiray ◽  
E. Erkan ◽  
G. Toktas ◽  
S. Kucukpolat ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16046-e16046
Author(s):  
Jorge Arellano ◽  
Kristina S Chen ◽  
Carolyn Atchison ◽  
Alex Rider ◽  
Andrew Worsfold ◽  
...  

e16046 Background: Advanced prostate cancer often leads to the development of BM and as a result SREs. Treatment and management of SREs, as well as the underlying disease, influences the patient’s HRQoL and HRU. We evaluated the impact of SREs on HRQoL (FACT-P) and HRU in patients with BM. Methods: Data were extracted from the Adelphi Prostate Cancer Disease-Specific Programme (DSP), a cross-sectional survey of 150 urologists and oncologists and their prostate cancer patients conducted from March to June 2012 in the US. Each specialist completed comprehensive record forms on 12 of their patients being treated for prostate cancer. Patients were invited to complete a questionnaire, which included the FACT-P HRQoL instrument. Patients were stratified by SRE experience to assess the impact of SRE on patients with BM. SRE was defined as an event of bone radiation, bone surgery, fracture, or spinal cord compression. Results: Data were collected from 1,749 prostate cancer patients, of which 941 were identified with BM; SRE status was recorded in 499 BM patients (Table). HRQoL was significantly lower in patients experiencing SREs, while the rate of consultations and likelihood of being hospitalized was significantly higher. Conclusions: SREs result in a significant economic burden on the healthcare system and negative impact on HRQoL in prostate cancer patients with BM. [Table: see text]


2013 ◽  
Vol 189 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Soroush Rais-Bahrami ◽  
M. Minhaj Siddiqui ◽  
Lambros Stamatakis ◽  
Srinivas Vourganti ◽  
Anthony N. Hoang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Tim Ullrich ◽  
Lars Schimmöller ◽  
Mathias Oymanns ◽  
Dirk Blondin ◽  
Frederic Dietzel ◽  
...  

Purpose To assess the current regional acceptance, valuation, and clinical role of multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) in prostate cancer diagnostics by patients and physicians. Materials and Methods Of 482 distributed standardized questionnaires, 328 patient and 31 physician questionnaires (urological and general practitioners in and around Düsseldorf) were analyzed over a period of 11 months. Questions were asked concerning general knowledge about prostate cancer, current diagnostic procedures, and knowledge about mp-MRI and MRI-guided biopsy. Results 70 % of the patients regarded accurate and exact diagnostics of prostate carcinomas as very important and 68 % considered MP-MRI a useful technique. 28 % of the patients with elevated PSA levels and negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS-GB) received MP-MRI as a secondary diagnostic. More than half of the patients estimated their overall knowledge about prostate cancer mediocre or worse and wished for more information about MR diagnostics. The majority of physicians (55 %) ordered MP-MRI studies of the prostate and 68 % saw their basic role in secondary diagnostics. Conclusion In this regional assessment mp-MRI of the prostate was considered useful by patients and practitioners. Currently, there still is a considerable discrepancy between recommended and the actual number of conducted MP-MRI studies, particularly in patients after previous negative TRUS-GB, although practitioners already see the benefit in this patient collective. Even though the use of prostate MRI is frequently more established than suggested in the current German S3-guideline, its full potential has not yet been exploited. More comprehensive information about the applications and diagnostic benefits of prostate MRI is needed and desired among patients and physicians. Key Points  Citation Format


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document