Radiologists’ preferences regarding content of prostate MRI reports: a survey of the Society of Abdominal Radiology

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 1807-1812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Spilseth ◽  
Daniel J. Margolis ◽  
Sangeet Ghai ◽  
Nayana U. Patel ◽  
Andrew B. Rosenkrantz
Radiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 296 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio C. Westphalen ◽  
Charles E. McCulloch ◽  
Jordan M. Anaokar ◽  
Sandeep Arora ◽  
Nimrod S. Barashi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 216 (4) ◽  
pp. 952-959
Author(s):  
Silvia D. Chang ◽  
Daniel J. A. Margolis ◽  
Baris Turkbey ◽  
Abigail A. Arnold ◽  
Sadhna Verma

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Giganti ◽  
Alex Kirkham ◽  
Veeru Kasivisvanathan ◽  
Marianthi-Vasiliki Papoutsaki ◽  
Shonit Punwani ◽  
...  

AbstractProstate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of high diagnostic quality is a key determinant for either detection or exclusion of prostate cancer. Adequate high spatial resolution on T2-weighted imaging, good diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences of high signal-to-noise ratio are the prerequisite for a high-quality MRI study of the prostate. The Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) score was created to assess the diagnostic quality of a scan against a set of objective criteria as per Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System recommendations, together with criteria obtained from the image. The PI-QUAL score is a 1-to-5 scale where a score of 1 indicates that all MR sequences (T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences) are below the minimum standard of diagnostic quality, a score of 3 means that the scan is of sufficient diagnostic quality, and a score of 5 implies that all three sequences are of optimal diagnostic quality. The purpose of this educational review is to provide a practical guide to assess the quality of prostate MRI using PI-QUAL and to familiarise the radiologist and all those involved in prostate MRI with this scoring system. A variety of images are also presented to demonstrate the difference between suboptimal and good prostate MR scans.


2021 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. 101957
Author(s):  
Rewa R. Sood ◽  
Wei Shao ◽  
Christian Kunder ◽  
Nikola C. Teslovich ◽  
Jeffrey B. Wang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document